|
Hi Wiziesan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC) |
You removed this without answering the questions: Please answer the questions.
Why are you removing administrative sockpuppet tags from User:Wazirinbida? Are you User:Wazirinbida? -- Begoon 07:11, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Wiziesan. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. -- Ronz ( talk) 17:20, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks( Wiziesan ( talk) 12:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC))
The article Tatiana Manaois has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jaclar0529 ( talk) 15:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
OK I'll Add more source, but already one source Is there ( Wiziesan ( talk) 15:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC))
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Pulse Nigeria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 15:51, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Please remove from your user page the templates/topicons for user-rights which you do not have:- autopatrolled, new page reviewer, pending changes reviewer, page mover. These are deceptive and may mislead other editors - I'm not sure why you would wish to do that... It would also be nice, for the same reason, if you removed all the userboxes saying you are a member of projects when you are not.
Removing the false user-rights items is important, and you should do that immediately. Removing the other stuff is up to you, but, as I say, I'm not sure why you would wish to mislead other editors. Thank you. -- Begoon 09:18, 18 October 2019 (UTC) OK I'll do that ( Wiziesan ( talk))
what about this sources, https://www.tuko.co.ke/302860-tatiana-manaois-songs-albums-videos.html and this one https://www.legit.ng/1223770-latest-tatiana-manaois-songs-2018-2019.html is it OK ( Wiziesan ( talk) 07:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC))
"I saw names that's are blocked, his name was blocked without offend,he one of Wikipedia, user that is good in article and editing". I don't like being lied to. Read WP:LITTLEBROTHER, particularly:
"Insulting the ... intelligence is the last thing a ... person should want to do, and in fact it often goes to show how a person has failed to change and in many ways shows why a person shouldn't be unblocked.". -- Begoon 11:44, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Thinking may be she was blocked by mistake, you know am a new user, am trying my best,
Please stop adding unsourced and improperly sourced content, particularly to articles about living people, as you did on Tatiana Manaois. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability and our strict policies on biographies of living people. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Legit, Naij.com.ng Nigerian News is it OK, ( Wiziesan ( talk) 13:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC))
Mr User:Begoon, check it now if it good and OK( Wiziesan ( talk) 15:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC))
(More citation needed), (multiple issue), to the page Blerf
https://blerf.org/index.php/about-blerf/ Blerf
But really, that's all besides the point - above you say (unindented and unsigned again) "Ok i see it"
. But you don't "see it" do you? Assuming you can find some decent sources or clarify the ones above, who is going to write the content? I asked you before to read
WP:CIR - now I'm telling you to read it - slowly, carefully, as many times as you need to until you really understand it. I'm sorry, but, in my opinion, you do not have the competence required to edit the English wikipedia, and it is unfair to expect other volunteer editors to continue cleaning up after you or writing your content for you. As I said above, making some small suggestions for edits to existing articles on talk pages might work, but trying to write entire new, notable articles as you have been seems way outside what you are capable of, and it's become disruptive and time-consuming to manage your attempts. --
Begoon
01:55, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Maybe worth a read: WP:Don't template the regulars. Abductive ( reasoning) 08:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
...and when you've finished that, read Wikipedia:Tag bombing. You've not even shown that you're capable of producing any acceptable content yourself yet, so what makes you think your recent contributions wandering around tagging other articles is something you're qualified to do? To round off the reading session, you should probably see WP:POINT, since reacting to having your own contributions tagged by looking for other stuff to tag as 'retaliation' is not a good look, particularly when your judgement in such matters has been shown to be so undeveloped and lacking.
Also, stop putting funny little, semi-literate one line "warnings/welcomes" on new user pages. There are acceptable ways to welcome new users, but it's generally expected that the welcomer would be someone who can provide help to the new editor should they need or ask for it - and, frankly, you simply would not be able to do that competently. -- Begoon 09:42, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
Wazirinbida (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
logs ·
block log ·
arb ·
rfc ·
lta ·
SPI ·
cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Kevin (aka
L235 ·
t ·
c)
00:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC) |
|
Hi Wiziesan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC) |
You removed this without answering the questions: Please answer the questions.
Why are you removing administrative sockpuppet tags from User:Wazirinbida? Are you User:Wazirinbida? -- Begoon 07:11, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Wiziesan. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. -- Ronz ( talk) 17:20, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks( Wiziesan ( talk) 12:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC))
The article Tatiana Manaois has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jaclar0529 ( talk) 15:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
OK I'll Add more source, but already one source Is there ( Wiziesan ( talk) 15:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC))
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Pulse Nigeria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 15:51, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Please remove from your user page the templates/topicons for user-rights which you do not have:- autopatrolled, new page reviewer, pending changes reviewer, page mover. These are deceptive and may mislead other editors - I'm not sure why you would wish to do that... It would also be nice, for the same reason, if you removed all the userboxes saying you are a member of projects when you are not.
Removing the false user-rights items is important, and you should do that immediately. Removing the other stuff is up to you, but, as I say, I'm not sure why you would wish to mislead other editors. Thank you. -- Begoon 09:18, 18 October 2019 (UTC) OK I'll do that ( Wiziesan ( talk))
what about this sources, https://www.tuko.co.ke/302860-tatiana-manaois-songs-albums-videos.html and this one https://www.legit.ng/1223770-latest-tatiana-manaois-songs-2018-2019.html is it OK ( Wiziesan ( talk) 07:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC))
"I saw names that's are blocked, his name was blocked without offend,he one of Wikipedia, user that is good in article and editing". I don't like being lied to. Read WP:LITTLEBROTHER, particularly:
"Insulting the ... intelligence is the last thing a ... person should want to do, and in fact it often goes to show how a person has failed to change and in many ways shows why a person shouldn't be unblocked.". -- Begoon 11:44, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Thinking may be she was blocked by mistake, you know am a new user, am trying my best,
Please stop adding unsourced and improperly sourced content, particularly to articles about living people, as you did on Tatiana Manaois. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability and our strict policies on biographies of living people. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Legit, Naij.com.ng Nigerian News is it OK, ( Wiziesan ( talk) 13:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC))
Mr User:Begoon, check it now if it good and OK( Wiziesan ( talk) 15:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC))
(More citation needed), (multiple issue), to the page Blerf
https://blerf.org/index.php/about-blerf/ Blerf
But really, that's all besides the point - above you say (unindented and unsigned again) "Ok i see it"
. But you don't "see it" do you? Assuming you can find some decent sources or clarify the ones above, who is going to write the content? I asked you before to read
WP:CIR - now I'm telling you to read it - slowly, carefully, as many times as you need to until you really understand it. I'm sorry, but, in my opinion, you do not have the competence required to edit the English wikipedia, and it is unfair to expect other volunteer editors to continue cleaning up after you or writing your content for you. As I said above, making some small suggestions for edits to existing articles on talk pages might work, but trying to write entire new, notable articles as you have been seems way outside what you are capable of, and it's become disruptive and time-consuming to manage your attempts. --
Begoon
01:55, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Maybe worth a read: WP:Don't template the regulars. Abductive ( reasoning) 08:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
...and when you've finished that, read Wikipedia:Tag bombing. You've not even shown that you're capable of producing any acceptable content yourself yet, so what makes you think your recent contributions wandering around tagging other articles is something you're qualified to do? To round off the reading session, you should probably see WP:POINT, since reacting to having your own contributions tagged by looking for other stuff to tag as 'retaliation' is not a good look, particularly when your judgement in such matters has been shown to be so undeveloped and lacking.
Also, stop putting funny little, semi-literate one line "warnings/welcomes" on new user pages. There are acceptable ways to welcome new users, but it's generally expected that the welcomer would be someone who can provide help to the new editor should they need or ask for it - and, frankly, you simply would not be able to do that competently. -- Begoon 09:42, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
Wazirinbida (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
logs ·
block log ·
arb ·
rfc ·
lta ·
SPI ·
cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Kevin (aka
L235 ·
t ·
c)
00:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC) |