![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A tag has been placed on Category:Georgia (country)–South Ossetia border requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:40, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
The article Template:Border of Kyrgyzstan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Duplicate with Template:Borders of Kyrgyzstan
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
KajenCAT (
talk) 17:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
John Major you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
David Eppstein --
David Eppstein (
talk) 06:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
The article
John Major you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:John Major for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
David Eppstein --
David Eppstein (
talk) 06:21, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Template:Borders of Ethiopia has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 15:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Borders of Malawi has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 15:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Borders of Tanzania has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 15:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
COVID-19 Barnstar | |
Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to COVID-19. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 8 March 2022 (UTC) |
The article Coincidance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, not notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
HenryTemplo (
talk) 11:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Embassy of North Macedonia, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NBUILDING.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:Borders of Nepal has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 21:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
The article Reality Is What You Can Get Away With has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This topic has no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Sources that I checked have either passing mention are do not cover this topic. Fails GNG and WP:NBOOK. Steve Quinn ( talk) 21:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Steve Quinn (
talk) 21:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Template:Borders of Croatia has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 15:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reality Is What You Can Get Away With until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Steve Quinn ( talk) 18:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Representative of Anguilla, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Representative of the UNHCR and WFP, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Office of the World Bank, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Mission of the International Organisation for Migration, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of East Timor, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 13:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Embassy of Ivory Coast, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Embassy of Tajikistan, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG. Only source is their own website.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Representative of Anguilla, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 01:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Commission of Antigua and Barbuda, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 06:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montserrat–United Kingdom relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 10:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Bosnia and Herzegovina, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 15:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article High Commission of Gabon, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No secondary sources, fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 18:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Embassy of Guatemala, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of otability. No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 18:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Embassy of Guinea, London requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder ( talk) 18:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Guinea, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 19:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Office of the World Bank, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 13:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Representative of the UNHCR and WFP, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 13:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mission of the International Organisation for Migration, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 00:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A tag has been placed on Category:Georgia (country)–South Ossetia border requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:40, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
The article Template:Border of Kyrgyzstan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Duplicate with Template:Borders of Kyrgyzstan
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
KajenCAT (
talk) 17:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
John Major you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
David Eppstein --
David Eppstein (
talk) 06:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
The article
John Major you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:John Major for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
David Eppstein --
David Eppstein (
talk) 06:21, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Template:Borders of Ethiopia has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 15:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Borders of Malawi has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 15:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Borders of Tanzania has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 15:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
COVID-19 Barnstar | |
Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to COVID-19. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 8 March 2022 (UTC) |
The article Coincidance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, not notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
HenryTemplo (
talk) 11:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Embassy of North Macedonia, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NBUILDING.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:Borders of Nepal has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 21:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
The article Reality Is What You Can Get Away With has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This topic has no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Sources that I checked have either passing mention are do not cover this topic. Fails GNG and WP:NBOOK. Steve Quinn ( talk) 21:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Steve Quinn (
talk) 21:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Template:Borders of Croatia has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 15:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reality Is What You Can Get Away With until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Steve Quinn ( talk) 18:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Representative of Anguilla, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Representative of the UNHCR and WFP, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Office of the World Bank, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Mission of the International Organisation for Migration, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of East Timor, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 13:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Embassy of Ivory Coast, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Embassy of Tajikistan, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG. Only source is their own website.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 13:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Representative of Anguilla, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 01:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Commission of Antigua and Barbuda, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 06:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montserrat–United Kingdom relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 10:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Bosnia and Herzegovina, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 15:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article High Commission of Gabon, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No secondary sources, fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 18:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Embassy of Guatemala, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of otability. No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AusLondonder (
talk) 18:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Embassy of Guinea, London requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder ( talk) 18:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Guinea, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 19:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Office of the World Bank, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 13:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Representative of the UNHCR and WFP, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 13:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mission of the International Organisation for Migration, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 00:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)