Archive 2
Hey the Aircrew badge you retagged is the Officers badge not the enlisted version. --
WilsBadKarma (
Talk/
Contribs) 06:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey man I'm up to late and missing stuff. My Bad I dont know what in the world I'm saying never mind thanks for the help.-- WilsBadKarma ( Talk/ Contribs) 06:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
“ | Also included in a sailor's rating is any "warfare qualification" earned. Obtaining such a qualification requires mastering a specified set of skills and information. For example, if Yeoman First Class Smith has earned his enlisted submarine qualification, his title would be "YN1(SS) John Smith". If Smith has multiple qualifications, they are stacked; i.e., additional qualifications in surface warfare would give him the title: "YN1(SS/SW) John Smith". While it may be possible to one day be "YN1(SS/SW/AW/NAC/SEAL/FPJ/MDV/EWS/SWCC/SCWS/IUSS/FMF) John Smith, it is highly unlikely; to date, the most designators earned by a single sailor is six. | ” |
Hmm. I would think that these would be considered formal titles (as, say, Privy Councillor, etc.), and would therefore be capitalized all the way through. In any case, if you're looking to set up an overall naming convention, feel free to start a discussion on WT:MILHIST. :-) Kirill Lokshin 02:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey man, I know the page United States Navy enlisted rate insignia bugged the crap out of you so I figured you would like the changes. I made all those rate patches and change out the collar devices to newer hier res ones. let me know what you think.-- WilsBadKarma ( Talk/ Contribs) 11:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! I will change over the Image! Æon Insanity Now! EA! 08:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Did you really make this image ( Image:CPO NOGC.png)? It's really nice. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 16:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
A new editor has put up HM-15 for peer review. Thought you may want to have a chop at it. Could use some major work.
On another note, love the work you have done with the 3 Portals. Was wondering if you could help us in sprucing up the design of the USMC portal a bit. Starting with the adding a background color on the main page and then the subpages with tabs to the rear. I am not to great with code so any help you could provide would be great. Cheers and thanks-- Looper5920 00:18, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 3 | 15 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Well, there are really two images to consider:
Basically, what needs to (eventually) happen is for all the links to image #2 to be changed to link to image #1 instead; then, image #2 can be deleted. Kirill Lokshin 03:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
In my examples of colors for the USMC portal, the top box (#ff3300) seems to have more of an orange hue to it than the lower box (#ff0000). The portal currently has #ff3300. Would you mind changing the mockup on your workpage to the navy border and the #ff0000 for an easy comparison at full size? Thanks. — ERcheck ( talk) 04:21, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for another set of eyes and all of your help. I've made the change to the portal — it now has a #ff0000 red. — ERcheck ( talk) 04:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
I wanted to thank you personally for all your help suggesting ideas on how to improve the portal. There was very little I knew on how to construct a portal, and now after only a couple of days of work I think the portal looks pretty good. Especially helpful was the information on how to improve the Associated Wikimedia section. I really appreciate the time you took to help out. Thanks. - Dozenist talk 04:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Distinguished Service Award | ||
This WikiChevrons award goes to Wilsbadkarma for his leadership and perseverance in bringing the List of United States Navy ratings up to featured list status. Rfrisbie talk 16:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Without your hard work, the List of United States Navy ratings would have lingered in the mists of mediocrity; instead it is now a featured list! |
Sorry I've been away, I've been out in the field. I'm currently leaching off a T-nothing out in the middle of Afghanistan. Oh joy. But, at least I *do* have connectivity, thank goodness for small favors, eh? And I'm not getting shot at <knock on wood>!
So got any other projects I can assist in? Just let me know!
Supersquid 14:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I was getting a little worried. I hadn't heard from you in a while but I didn't want to jinx it with a "are you ok" message. I'm working on a couple of things List of United States Navy staff corps, United States Navy enlisted rate insignia, and List of United States Navy Carrier air wings. I'm just really starting on them but I would like to get them to Featured list status. Keep your head down.— WilsBadKarma (Talk/Contribs) 15:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Good evening, I'm in need of reference material for noncom responsibilities and by the way I have looked everywhere for reference to the whole First Class and Chiefs mess paragraphs and can't find anything plus I see where ERCheck couldn't find anything either and I know him he's as good as I am at finding obscure info, so we need to make a decision if we don't turn up anything soon as to whether or not we leave it in.— WilsBadKarma (Talk) 01:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Here are my United States Navy enlisted rate insignia comments. It's definitely an article, and it looks pretty good to me. I would put it up for peer review next. Rfrisbie talk 05:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi.
On
Talk:USS Abbot (DD-629), you rated the article as "|B-Class-5=no". The
standards page says "...5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams." The article has an infobox with a picture, links to the text source, a footer... What more should it have?
—wwoods 18:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 5 | 29 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert! I may return the favor. :) -- EarthPerson 19:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help.-- Boris Allen 23:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
One comment if I may. When replying, please use ":" in front of your answer to indent it from the question. Please keep helping us out! Xiner ( talk, email) 02:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!
Delivered by grafikbot 11:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Is this right now? Lord I hate not knowing how to do something, but learning is certainly fun Boston24 17:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I'm wondering. How do you respond so fast to {{helpme}} messages? Is there any way to know that someone need help? 'Cause I notice you came to Boston24's aid with lightning speed! :-O – Pea ceNT 17:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward
-- TomasBat ( Talk) 21:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
It was successful. Thank you so much for your help! -- Extranet ( Talk | Contribs) 00:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
I, Extranet, award Wilsbadkarma this Barnstar of Diligence for such kind and thankful community service and help. -- Extranet ( Talk | Contribs) 00:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC) |
That is awesome! So I would not have to do anything? For real?! That would be awesome. Thanks man, seriously, for all your help. I can handle the dental content, but it is this exact stuff that I must depend on others. - Dozenist talk 03:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't get how to create disambiguation pages. Maybe someone else can create the page. Thylacine lover 00:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 6 | 5 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Sweet, thanks for the answer here. What about the soon to be retired S-3 Viking squadrons (out by 2009)? Btw, they are VS-__ squadrons, which stand for "Sea Control." -- ProdigySportsman 04:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey, it was suggested both at the peer review and at FP that the various "selected" boxes might be reorganized to put "Read more," "Suggest" and "More selected whatever" all in-line at the bottom of the boxes - is this possible with the "selected whatever with nominate template"? Or will it require some changes? And if so, can you give me some pointers on how that might be accomplished? Sorry for so many questions, and thanks in advance for any help you can give. Carom 16:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 7 | 12 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!
Delivered by grafikbot 15:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the help with the infobox. I searched and searched for that in vain. The page looks wonderful now, for just a stub! -- Ate Pinay ( talk• email) 19:01, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey, Perhaps you can check on the infobox of Eskayan? This is suggested in the peer review, but has been a source of headache for me...-- Ate Pinay ( talk• email) 19:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
The Philippine Barnstar | ||
I award you this Philippine Barnstar for your incredible efforts in contributing to Wikipedia's Philippine-related articles, particularly on Portal:Bohol In the same note, I, as people of Bohol, hereby also declare you ADOPTED SON OF BOHOL, Philippines . -- Ate Pinay ( talk• email) 22:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC) |
It seems as though someone did it for me already. Thank you so much for your attempt to assist me. I appreciate it and hope that I'm actually using these talk pages appropriately now although something leads me to believe I'm still not doing it right
How do you start a new page? I'm confused!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
As one of the editors I put great faith in I was hoping you could do me a favor and take a read through List of United States Marine Corps aircraft squadrons. You may have noticed that it has been my pet project for awhile. I am still working on the intro but I was hoping you could just go through and copyedit. Right now I still need to add the Post WWII info and edit some of the earlier stuff. It needs a fresh set of eyes to make sure it is on the right track. When it is complete one of these days I am hoping to put it up for WP:FLC. Anyway, if you have a few spare moments please give it the once over. Cheers.-- Looper5920 06:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your message... I thought I would ask because, there is already someone that is a potential 2032 presidential candidate. Hopefully, you can help me and lead me thru wikipedia, if I make a mistake. Thanks... Tony16 07:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the userbox. I'll put it on my page right now. Xiner ( talk, email) 14:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Maybe you are really a God-send to me, right after working on Bishop Cabajog! Or perhaps Christmas came early this year? hehehehe. Well, Portal:Bohol is a project that I started but cannot let fly! Got stuck somehow...let me know if you can help, or give me ideas...Thanks for coming into my wiki life...-- Ate Pinay ( talk• email) 19:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
<font=3> Thank you for the help in making the Portal:Bohol - with sincerest gratitude from: User:Pinay06 |
---|
(reset indent) BTW, there are/were some edits made on Portal:Bohol which I have kept reverted to your last version. I have requested User:23prootie to stop her edits for now since I want the people of Bohol to savor this for now that it has been launched! thoughts? suggestions? semi protect? -- Ate Pinay ( talk• email) 03:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for you for your 'help me' response and the welcome/advice. Steve3849 19:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 8 | 19 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations on the Featured List!
I was looking over your references and saw that you used "freedictionary" as a reference for "fouled anchor". I think that there are more authoritative references. Perhaps:
— ERcheck ( talk) 12:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks but I don't get it: what list and what red link?Editorwikipedia 16:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC) I think I get it now. The "red link in the list" is the red title of the article in the list of articles posted that day. I clicked it, pasted the same text that was there and, apparently, the article is now created. Thanks. It was not an obvious step. Much of Wikipedia procedure is such unstated detail. Editorwikipedia 17:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Wils, I cam across a User:Bondoa6 who seems to be a naval aviator of some type. Anyway, his two big contributions .... Attack Squadron 42 (U.S. Navy) and Attack Squadron 65 (U.S. Navy) could use a lot of clean up if you are interested. Don't know about you but I am not a big fan of listing every COs name also. I'll drop him a line when iIget a chance. Have to run to work now. Cheers-- Looper5920 19:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Please go through and start assessing some of those Navy articles.-- Looper5920 10:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
No problem; and thanks for taking the time to do the tagging in the first place! Kirill Lokshin 04:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
I assert to being the same user as commons:User:Wilsbadkarma Cheers — WilsBadKarma ( Talk) 08:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm having a hard time finding official bios for U.S. Navy officers involved in the Pacific Theater of World War II. The U.S. Navy historical site appears to only have the bios for O-8 ("two-star") and above even many of those are missing, like John S. McCain, Sr.. Do you know of a resource, publication, or website where I could find the historical bios for O-6 or O-7 and above U.S. Navy officers? Cla68 07:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thank you for the barnstar. It is always nice to open the talk page and see one of them. Cheers and look forward to working with you in the future.-- Looper5920 19:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
On Amanda Wilkinson, Here is a assignment:please put this under the info box:
Height = 5' 1"
Thanks alot!Very Warm Regards,( User:Trampton 05:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)).
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Archive 2
Hey the Aircrew badge you retagged is the Officers badge not the enlisted version. --
WilsBadKarma (
Talk/
Contribs) 06:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey man I'm up to late and missing stuff. My Bad I dont know what in the world I'm saying never mind thanks for the help.-- WilsBadKarma ( Talk/ Contribs) 06:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
“ | Also included in a sailor's rating is any "warfare qualification" earned. Obtaining such a qualification requires mastering a specified set of skills and information. For example, if Yeoman First Class Smith has earned his enlisted submarine qualification, his title would be "YN1(SS) John Smith". If Smith has multiple qualifications, they are stacked; i.e., additional qualifications in surface warfare would give him the title: "YN1(SS/SW) John Smith". While it may be possible to one day be "YN1(SS/SW/AW/NAC/SEAL/FPJ/MDV/EWS/SWCC/SCWS/IUSS/FMF) John Smith, it is highly unlikely; to date, the most designators earned by a single sailor is six. | ” |
Hmm. I would think that these would be considered formal titles (as, say, Privy Councillor, etc.), and would therefore be capitalized all the way through. In any case, if you're looking to set up an overall naming convention, feel free to start a discussion on WT:MILHIST. :-) Kirill Lokshin 02:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey man, I know the page United States Navy enlisted rate insignia bugged the crap out of you so I figured you would like the changes. I made all those rate patches and change out the collar devices to newer hier res ones. let me know what you think.-- WilsBadKarma ( Talk/ Contribs) 11:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! I will change over the Image! Æon Insanity Now! EA! 08:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Did you really make this image ( Image:CPO NOGC.png)? It's really nice. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 16:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
A new editor has put up HM-15 for peer review. Thought you may want to have a chop at it. Could use some major work.
On another note, love the work you have done with the 3 Portals. Was wondering if you could help us in sprucing up the design of the USMC portal a bit. Starting with the adding a background color on the main page and then the subpages with tabs to the rear. I am not to great with code so any help you could provide would be great. Cheers and thanks-- Looper5920 00:18, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 3 | 15 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Well, there are really two images to consider:
Basically, what needs to (eventually) happen is for all the links to image #2 to be changed to link to image #1 instead; then, image #2 can be deleted. Kirill Lokshin 03:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
In my examples of colors for the USMC portal, the top box (#ff3300) seems to have more of an orange hue to it than the lower box (#ff0000). The portal currently has #ff3300. Would you mind changing the mockup on your workpage to the navy border and the #ff0000 for an easy comparison at full size? Thanks. — ERcheck ( talk) 04:21, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for another set of eyes and all of your help. I've made the change to the portal — it now has a #ff0000 red. — ERcheck ( talk) 04:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
I wanted to thank you personally for all your help suggesting ideas on how to improve the portal. There was very little I knew on how to construct a portal, and now after only a couple of days of work I think the portal looks pretty good. Especially helpful was the information on how to improve the Associated Wikimedia section. I really appreciate the time you took to help out. Thanks. - Dozenist talk 04:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Distinguished Service Award | ||
This WikiChevrons award goes to Wilsbadkarma for his leadership and perseverance in bringing the List of United States Navy ratings up to featured list status. Rfrisbie talk 16:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Without your hard work, the List of United States Navy ratings would have lingered in the mists of mediocrity; instead it is now a featured list! |
Sorry I've been away, I've been out in the field. I'm currently leaching off a T-nothing out in the middle of Afghanistan. Oh joy. But, at least I *do* have connectivity, thank goodness for small favors, eh? And I'm not getting shot at <knock on wood>!
So got any other projects I can assist in? Just let me know!
Supersquid 14:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I was getting a little worried. I hadn't heard from you in a while but I didn't want to jinx it with a "are you ok" message. I'm working on a couple of things List of United States Navy staff corps, United States Navy enlisted rate insignia, and List of United States Navy Carrier air wings. I'm just really starting on them but I would like to get them to Featured list status. Keep your head down.— WilsBadKarma (Talk/Contribs) 15:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Good evening, I'm in need of reference material for noncom responsibilities and by the way I have looked everywhere for reference to the whole First Class and Chiefs mess paragraphs and can't find anything plus I see where ERCheck couldn't find anything either and I know him he's as good as I am at finding obscure info, so we need to make a decision if we don't turn up anything soon as to whether or not we leave it in.— WilsBadKarma (Talk) 01:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Here are my United States Navy enlisted rate insignia comments. It's definitely an article, and it looks pretty good to me. I would put it up for peer review next. Rfrisbie talk 05:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi.
On
Talk:USS Abbot (DD-629), you rated the article as "|B-Class-5=no". The
standards page says "...5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams." The article has an infobox with a picture, links to the text source, a footer... What more should it have?
—wwoods 18:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 5 | 29 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert! I may return the favor. :) -- EarthPerson 19:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help.-- Boris Allen 23:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
One comment if I may. When replying, please use ":" in front of your answer to indent it from the question. Please keep helping us out! Xiner ( talk, email) 02:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!
Delivered by grafikbot 11:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Is this right now? Lord I hate not knowing how to do something, but learning is certainly fun Boston24 17:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I'm wondering. How do you respond so fast to {{helpme}} messages? Is there any way to know that someone need help? 'Cause I notice you came to Boston24's aid with lightning speed! :-O – Pea ceNT 17:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward
-- TomasBat ( Talk) 21:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
It was successful. Thank you so much for your help! -- Extranet ( Talk | Contribs) 00:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
I, Extranet, award Wilsbadkarma this Barnstar of Diligence for such kind and thankful community service and help. -- Extranet ( Talk | Contribs) 00:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC) |
That is awesome! So I would not have to do anything? For real?! That would be awesome. Thanks man, seriously, for all your help. I can handle the dental content, but it is this exact stuff that I must depend on others. - Dozenist talk 03:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't get how to create disambiguation pages. Maybe someone else can create the page. Thylacine lover 00:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 6 | 5 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Sweet, thanks for the answer here. What about the soon to be retired S-3 Viking squadrons (out by 2009)? Btw, they are VS-__ squadrons, which stand for "Sea Control." -- ProdigySportsman 04:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey, it was suggested both at the peer review and at FP that the various "selected" boxes might be reorganized to put "Read more," "Suggest" and "More selected whatever" all in-line at the bottom of the boxes - is this possible with the "selected whatever with nominate template"? Or will it require some changes? And if so, can you give me some pointers on how that might be accomplished? Sorry for so many questions, and thanks in advance for any help you can give. Carom 16:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 7 | 12 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!
Delivered by grafikbot 15:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the help with the infobox. I searched and searched for that in vain. The page looks wonderful now, for just a stub! -- Ate Pinay ( talk• email) 19:01, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey, Perhaps you can check on the infobox of Eskayan? This is suggested in the peer review, but has been a source of headache for me...-- Ate Pinay ( talk• email) 19:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
The Philippine Barnstar | ||
I award you this Philippine Barnstar for your incredible efforts in contributing to Wikipedia's Philippine-related articles, particularly on Portal:Bohol In the same note, I, as people of Bohol, hereby also declare you ADOPTED SON OF BOHOL, Philippines . -- Ate Pinay ( talk• email) 22:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC) |
It seems as though someone did it for me already. Thank you so much for your attempt to assist me. I appreciate it and hope that I'm actually using these talk pages appropriately now although something leads me to believe I'm still not doing it right
How do you start a new page? I'm confused!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
As one of the editors I put great faith in I was hoping you could do me a favor and take a read through List of United States Marine Corps aircraft squadrons. You may have noticed that it has been my pet project for awhile. I am still working on the intro but I was hoping you could just go through and copyedit. Right now I still need to add the Post WWII info and edit some of the earlier stuff. It needs a fresh set of eyes to make sure it is on the right track. When it is complete one of these days I am hoping to put it up for WP:FLC. Anyway, if you have a few spare moments please give it the once over. Cheers.-- Looper5920 06:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your message... I thought I would ask because, there is already someone that is a potential 2032 presidential candidate. Hopefully, you can help me and lead me thru wikipedia, if I make a mistake. Thanks... Tony16 07:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the userbox. I'll put it on my page right now. Xiner ( talk, email) 14:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Maybe you are really a God-send to me, right after working on Bishop Cabajog! Or perhaps Christmas came early this year? hehehehe. Well, Portal:Bohol is a project that I started but cannot let fly! Got stuck somehow...let me know if you can help, or give me ideas...Thanks for coming into my wiki life...-- Ate Pinay ( talk• email) 19:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
<font=3> Thank you for the help in making the Portal:Bohol - with sincerest gratitude from: User:Pinay06 |
---|
(reset indent) BTW, there are/were some edits made on Portal:Bohol which I have kept reverted to your last version. I have requested User:23prootie to stop her edits for now since I want the people of Bohol to savor this for now that it has been launched! thoughts? suggestions? semi protect? -- Ate Pinay ( talk• email) 03:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for you for your 'help me' response and the welcome/advice. Steve3849 19:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 8 | 19 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations on the Featured List!
I was looking over your references and saw that you used "freedictionary" as a reference for "fouled anchor". I think that there are more authoritative references. Perhaps:
— ERcheck ( talk) 12:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks but I don't get it: what list and what red link?Editorwikipedia 16:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC) I think I get it now. The "red link in the list" is the red title of the article in the list of articles posted that day. I clicked it, pasted the same text that was there and, apparently, the article is now created. Thanks. It was not an obvious step. Much of Wikipedia procedure is such unstated detail. Editorwikipedia 17:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Wils, I cam across a User:Bondoa6 who seems to be a naval aviator of some type. Anyway, his two big contributions .... Attack Squadron 42 (U.S. Navy) and Attack Squadron 65 (U.S. Navy) could use a lot of clean up if you are interested. Don't know about you but I am not a big fan of listing every COs name also. I'll drop him a line when iIget a chance. Have to run to work now. Cheers-- Looper5920 19:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Please go through and start assessing some of those Navy articles.-- Looper5920 10:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
No problem; and thanks for taking the time to do the tagging in the first place! Kirill Lokshin 04:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
I assert to being the same user as commons:User:Wilsbadkarma Cheers — WilsBadKarma ( Talk) 08:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm having a hard time finding official bios for U.S. Navy officers involved in the Pacific Theater of World War II. The U.S. Navy historical site appears to only have the bios for O-8 ("two-star") and above even many of those are missing, like John S. McCain, Sr.. Do you know of a resource, publication, or website where I could find the historical bios for O-6 or O-7 and above U.S. Navy officers? Cla68 07:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thank you for the barnstar. It is always nice to open the talk page and see one of them. Cheers and look forward to working with you in the future.-- Looper5920 19:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
On Amanda Wilkinson, Here is a assignment:please put this under the info box:
Height = 5' 1"
Thanks alot!Very Warm Regards,( User:Trampton 05:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)).
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)