Hello, WiktorLinus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your
talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "
adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a
WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!
Peaceray (
talk)
22:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KartikeyaS343 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Fabian Egger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Fabian Egger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Hello, WiktorLinus!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KartikeyaS (
talk)
07:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Paid editing disclosure
Thank you for disclosing your paid editing status, but that's not enough. As per
WP:PAID you are also required to provide links to your profiles on all sites where you "advertise, solicit or obtain paid Wikipedia-editing services" to fully comply with the policy.
GSS💬03:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Hello,
GSS. you have placed all my current AFCs on hold and stated, "Possible WP:MEAT/WP:SOCK; Please wait till the investigation is over see Wikipedia:List of paid editing companies#Submit Express." Can you send me a link to the investigation? I am not finding it anywhere. Also, I do not have multiple accounts. I am an ethical editor that complies with all Wikipedia policies. I have disclosed paid editing as required. If you have any evidence or reason for believing I have multiple accounts, please explain. And which other account do you think is me? Please explain, otherwise I will wait a couple of days and resubmit the pages.
WiktorLinus (
talk)
01:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)reply
On your user page you disclosed that you are working for "Submit Express" and as per some off-wiki evidence the freelancer who was hired to create
David Bohigian has a long history of undisclosed paid editing so you can't edit on their behalf. @
MER-C and
GeneralNotability: please check your inbox with latest findings. Thank you,
GSS💬04:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC)reply
To
GSS,
MER-C and
GeneralNotability: Regarding
David Bohigian, I am the one who created it and I have disclosed paid editing. I have only created 5 pages and I have disclosed paid editing on all of them and submitted to AFC. Which other pages are you referring to? Please explain. I am aware that
David Bohigian previously had a page which was removed for copyright violation. I have no idea who created it before, but it was not me. You say "the freelancer who was hired to create David Bohigian has a long history of undisclosed paid editing" but this has nothing to do with me. Could you tell me which Freelancer you are referring to? Is this person that originally created the page? If so, this has nothing to do with me. I have complied with all Wiki terms and I am an ethical editor. Please provide me with details of the off-wiki evidence you are referring to.
WiktorLinus (
talk)
21:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The freelancer who is hired for this project is the founder of the company you disclosed on your userpage and they have a long history of undisclosed paid editing so until they disclose all their accounts and paid edits you are not allowed to edit on their behalf it's a violation of
WP:MEAT.
GSS💬02:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GSS were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources are passing mentions, press releases, interviews, profiles and a few unreliable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Ronny Hadani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Ronny Hadani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Hello, WiktorLinus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:GEP (Company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request
userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
here.
Hello, WiktorLinus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your
talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "
adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a
WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!
Peaceray (
talk)
22:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KartikeyaS343 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Fabian Egger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Fabian Egger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Hello, WiktorLinus!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KartikeyaS (
talk)
07:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Paid editing disclosure
Thank you for disclosing your paid editing status, but that's not enough. As per
WP:PAID you are also required to provide links to your profiles on all sites where you "advertise, solicit or obtain paid Wikipedia-editing services" to fully comply with the policy.
GSS💬03:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Hello,
GSS. you have placed all my current AFCs on hold and stated, "Possible WP:MEAT/WP:SOCK; Please wait till the investigation is over see Wikipedia:List of paid editing companies#Submit Express." Can you send me a link to the investigation? I am not finding it anywhere. Also, I do not have multiple accounts. I am an ethical editor that complies with all Wikipedia policies. I have disclosed paid editing as required. If you have any evidence or reason for believing I have multiple accounts, please explain. And which other account do you think is me? Please explain, otherwise I will wait a couple of days and resubmit the pages.
WiktorLinus (
talk)
01:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)reply
On your user page you disclosed that you are working for "Submit Express" and as per some off-wiki evidence the freelancer who was hired to create
David Bohigian has a long history of undisclosed paid editing so you can't edit on their behalf. @
MER-C and
GeneralNotability: please check your inbox with latest findings. Thank you,
GSS💬04:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC)reply
To
GSS,
MER-C and
GeneralNotability: Regarding
David Bohigian, I am the one who created it and I have disclosed paid editing. I have only created 5 pages and I have disclosed paid editing on all of them and submitted to AFC. Which other pages are you referring to? Please explain. I am aware that
David Bohigian previously had a page which was removed for copyright violation. I have no idea who created it before, but it was not me. You say "the freelancer who was hired to create David Bohigian has a long history of undisclosed paid editing" but this has nothing to do with me. Could you tell me which Freelancer you are referring to? Is this person that originally created the page? If so, this has nothing to do with me. I have complied with all Wiki terms and I am an ethical editor. Please provide me with details of the off-wiki evidence you are referring to.
WiktorLinus (
talk)
21:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The freelancer who is hired for this project is the founder of the company you disclosed on your userpage and they have a long history of undisclosed paid editing so until they disclose all their accounts and paid edits you are not allowed to edit on their behalf it's a violation of
WP:MEAT.
GSS💬02:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GSS were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources are passing mentions, press releases, interviews, profiles and a few unreliable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Ronny Hadani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Ronny Hadani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Hello, WiktorLinus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:GEP (Company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request
userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
here.