Your recent edits to
Charlie Puth could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on
legal threats and
civility. Users who make such threats may be
blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for
dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by
reliable independent sources and focusing especially on
verifiable errors of fact. Thank you.
Binksternet (
talk)
02:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Legends Never Die (Juice Wrld album), without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
TheAmazingPeanuts (
talk)
00:45, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, your addition to
Exeter Township Senior High School was
undone because neither your addition nor the
Taylor Bertolet article provide reliable references indicating Bertolet was a student there. Please also note that Wikipedia defines NFL players that played a regular season or post-season game, which does not apply to Bertolet.
• Gene93k (
talk)
20:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
George Floyd protests in North Carolina, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources.
Ed
talk!
19:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Death of Stone Foltz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
HickoryOughtShirt?4 (
talk)
04:35, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
I just filled out the Death of Stone Foltz draft that you created. The original draft violated both WP:Verifiability and WP:BLPCRIME policies. The criminality of the incident is alleged, and Wikipedia cannot state it as a fact until a conviction is secured. Just as important, always cite reliable sources that support the content you contribute, especially when the subject is contentious. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:37, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Wikihow6754,
Thank you for creating USDA Coalition of Minority Employees.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thanks for creating this page. The sourcing for the article could be improved, for example citing the organisation itself is generally not a reliable way of demonstrating notability. There is significant reporting about this organisation in the media (from a quick search I found Washington Post, Politico and Mother Jones articles) and these should be included in the article so notability is more clearly demonstrated. Regards,
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Goldsztajn ( talk) 09:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric J. Barron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek life. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 07:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Donda (album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you.
AshMusique (
talk)
06:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mr.weedle. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Death of Tim Piazza, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Mr.weedle (
talk)
04:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm sure you didn't mean that you, Wikihow6754, are attempting to alter public opinion in anticipation of a trial, did you?
Because that's what you said. DS ( talk) 00:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Do not add unsourced or poorly-sourced information about living, recently deceased, or possibly deceased people anywhere on Wikipedia. That includes citing a tweet by someone accusing someone else of a crime, if that tweet has not been discussed in reliable sources. Further, per WP:BLPCRIME, do not refer to alleged crimes as having definitely happened.
You have done both of these recently at Death of Tim Piazza—using a tweet that was made only shortly before your edit, I will add, which is rather suspicious. You were warned for this before, last May. If you make edits like this again, I will block you from editing and/or impose sanctions under the following arbitration remedy:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
-- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 01:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she|they|xe)
02:16, 10 November 2022 (UTC)I understand the rules and request an unblock. I am not a Wikipedia Veteran like some, and I am willing to learn more about the process. The intention was not slander or maltreatment, and did not affect the outcome of an election. The redaction was created, and the page edited to mark universal Wikipedia code. In future editing here onto, Wikipedia rules will be more strictly followed. Wikihow6754 ( talk) 16:25, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Your recent edits to
Charlie Puth could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on
legal threats and
civility. Users who make such threats may be
blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for
dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by
reliable independent sources and focusing especially on
verifiable errors of fact. Thank you.
Binksternet (
talk)
02:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Legends Never Die (Juice Wrld album), without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
TheAmazingPeanuts (
talk)
00:45, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, your addition to
Exeter Township Senior High School was
undone because neither your addition nor the
Taylor Bertolet article provide reliable references indicating Bertolet was a student there. Please also note that Wikipedia defines NFL players that played a regular season or post-season game, which does not apply to Bertolet.
• Gene93k (
talk)
20:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
George Floyd protests in North Carolina, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources.
Ed
talk!
19:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Death of Stone Foltz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
HickoryOughtShirt?4 (
talk)
04:35, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
I just filled out the Death of Stone Foltz draft that you created. The original draft violated both WP:Verifiability and WP:BLPCRIME policies. The criminality of the incident is alleged, and Wikipedia cannot state it as a fact until a conviction is secured. Just as important, always cite reliable sources that support the content you contribute, especially when the subject is contentious. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:37, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Wikihow6754,
Thank you for creating USDA Coalition of Minority Employees.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thanks for creating this page. The sourcing for the article could be improved, for example citing the organisation itself is generally not a reliable way of demonstrating notability. There is significant reporting about this organisation in the media (from a quick search I found Washington Post, Politico and Mother Jones articles) and these should be included in the article so notability is more clearly demonstrated. Regards,
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Goldsztajn ( talk) 09:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric J. Barron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek life. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 07:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Donda (album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you.
AshMusique (
talk)
06:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mr.weedle. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Death of Tim Piazza, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Mr.weedle (
talk)
04:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm sure you didn't mean that you, Wikihow6754, are attempting to alter public opinion in anticipation of a trial, did you?
Because that's what you said. DS ( talk) 00:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Do not add unsourced or poorly-sourced information about living, recently deceased, or possibly deceased people anywhere on Wikipedia. That includes citing a tweet by someone accusing someone else of a crime, if that tweet has not been discussed in reliable sources. Further, per WP:BLPCRIME, do not refer to alleged crimes as having definitely happened.
You have done both of these recently at Death of Tim Piazza—using a tweet that was made only shortly before your edit, I will add, which is rather suspicious. You were warned for this before, last May. If you make edits like this again, I will block you from editing and/or impose sanctions under the following arbitration remedy:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
-- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 01:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she|they|xe)
02:16, 10 November 2022 (UTC)I understand the rules and request an unblock. I am not a Wikipedia Veteran like some, and I am willing to learn more about the process. The intention was not slander or maltreatment, and did not affect the outcome of an election. The redaction was created, and the page edited to mark universal Wikipedia code. In future editing here onto, Wikipedia rules will be more strictly followed. Wikihow6754 ( talk) 16:25, 10 November 2022 (UTC)