![]() | |
Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #287 |
DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This archive page covers approximately the dates between Feb. 12 and Sep. 23 2005.
Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.
Please add new archivals to User Talk:Lbmixpro/Archive02. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you.
Hello. I have at some point contributed about 50% of the current MInish Cap article. I am the one who added the comment about Minish CAp's music being very similar to that of WW. You removed that comment because both scores where composed before The Wind Waker. Can you please provide proof/sources of that claim? I dare say I have some knowledge of the Zelda series and I do not know in which other game these melodies appeared before THe WInd Waker. Phils 18:29, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
You seem to have done a great job taking this article toward NPOV. Thanks. Rlquall 22:24, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
We need your help again, to mediate a POV dispute between Ealva, gcessor and me. Thanks much, -- Onlytofind 05:19, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
Just wanted to give you a heads up: it's not actually protected. I would have done so myself, but I wasn't sure what your plan was. – Clockwork Soul 13:33, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I can assure you the WM X8 article is not copied from another source; I wrote the vast majority of the current version with the help of various internet accounts of the event, but did not copy them. If you need further proof of this, try Googling content phrases from the article. If you find hits anywhere other than Wikipedia or one of its mirrors, I will copyedit that section. Plagiarism is a serious accusation and you should be sure you have proof before you make it.
I've noticed that you've made a number of contributions to pro wrestling articles. You should consider joining the
Pro wrestling WikiProject. --
Chrysaor 17:33, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
Why did you move this to her real name? I've moved it back. I'm no wrestling fan, but no one ever uses her real name. It makes no sense to put the article there. Adam Bishop 23:31, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
Got your message. Darn! That'd be Onlytofind. I'm very happy to support this, but that kind of page needs a load of thought and ought to have been set up *before* posting the complaint. It's 1.30am here and I'm going away for few days tomorrow, so I can't deal with it now. RayGirvan 00:35, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
OK, dealt with, as the page had been started. RayGirvan 03:42, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
I'm very sorry that I started it late. I was just so angry over the fact that Emico is running amok inside the Wikipedia and peppering articles with personal opinion and bias.-- Onlytofind 05:18, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
Please inform me as to when and if you will take the Emico complaint to the arbitration committee.-- Onlytofind 20:36, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
His behavior has gotten even worse, check out the comment he left on Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo-- Onlytofind 20:43, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't have one for Amy Lee. I was just splitting up an article that was little more than a list of artists with their profiles. -- Xcali 00:58, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Glenn has claimed that I added the Harper paper because I wanted to bypass the vote, which is something that I didn't intend on doing, and I deeply resent Glenn's claim. It seems that he thinks everything I do is in bad intentions and that I only want to belittle the INC, even though I recently wrote the section of evangelical activities and added another link putting bloc votes into context with other Philippine religions. I have the urge to revert the article, but I'm trying to solve this problem within Wikipedia rules, and I would appreciate your help if you could also talk to Glenn about assuming good faith, because I feel that he will revert everything I write since he thinks that I have a vendetta against the INC, which I do not.-- Onlytofind 03:35, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your help, I'll see how this plays out.-- Onlytofind 21:23, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I would like to know if you think his behavior on the Iglesia ni Cristo page has warranted the creation of one.-- Onlytofind 09:16, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
See Talk:Christina_Aguilera#Protection_request - Mgm| (talk) 12:07, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Emico has been accepted and is now open. Please bring evidence to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Emico/Evidence. Thank you. -- sannse (talk) 19:02, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hi Leon, how are you doing? I believe that you have the makings of a good Administrator. How long have you been in Wiki and what are your main interests in Wiki? As you noticed in the Natalie and Nicole Albino and the Nina Sky articles. Everything written in the latter came form the article I originated, except for the first sentence. Anyway, I submitted the merge idea, so as to avoid lossing any of the edit history, to a fellow administrator User:Stormie, who quite an expert in the area. I'm glad that you have shown a great dedication to the project. Tony the Marine 05:22, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
About the vocal profile of Christina Aguilera. I noticed that you removed the profile due to the WP:CITE and WP:NOR rules. But while looking at the diff between Maxim's edit and your reversion, there was a URL citing where the profile came from. Is this source acceptable for the article? If not, why? -- LBMixPro (Speak on it!) 08:30, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
I think that allowing the article to continue without the section focusing on the controversy surrounding EVM will be a victory for some who would rather not see any criticism surrounding Mr Manalo. Nobody knows for certain (aside from the parties involved) the real truth, but I believe the newspaper links and section from Doronilla's book are still notable enough to include in the article. I felt personally that the last edit before the removal of the section was fair and neutral enough without favouring any side. If there is a way to include them without any further commentary or allegation, IMHO, that would be the best solution. -- Ironbrew 22:44, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
Thank you. &mdash Theo (Talk) 00:36, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Emico →Raul654 20:06, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
She was traded to RAW on August 22nd, no reason to change it back to Smackdown.
Check my comments at Talk:Iglesia_ni_Cristo#Deletion_of_the_Blog-- Ironbrew 22:14, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TheoClarke#Emico.27s_at_it_again.-- Ironbrew 08:31, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
Judging from the first contributions, it seemed a little less sophisticated than what Emico usually does, but since that user added the template- I have my niggling suspicions that it's Emico trying to circumvent the ban once again? Does it seem to you like it's him or not?-- Ironbrew 05:35, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
Let's face it, Emico isn't gonna stop with the proxy h4x0r1ng and he doesn't care about the ban since he'll always try to find ways around it. You suggested locking the article a few days ago and I think it's a good idea.-- Ironbrew 00:18, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
If we legitimize additions from a blocked user, isn't that tantamount to making Wikipedia law and the decision of the Arbitration Council useless? Wikipedia already banned Emico for making POV edits, if we let him back in, he will do the same and we'd be back to Square One, IMHO. -- Ironbrew 08:12, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
I read through your response and I agree with as well as respect your decision. I have no personal vendetta against Emico (except for his continous accusation of the SP towards me- which can make one really angry, since he did use SP accounts) and if he is serious about mending his ways, I promise to respect his edits and start fresh if he enters mentorship with Theo. It seems that he also needs to learn that on WP, the cardinal rule is that your contributions will be edited mercilessly and at will.-- Ironbrew 05:23, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your message on my talk page. I am not sure how you would like me to help. I like the idea of mentorship but just at present I am too busy elsewhere to do that effectively. How else my I contribute? — Theo (Talk) 09:16, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
![]() | |
Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #287 |
DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This archive page covers approximately the dates between Feb. 12 and Sep. 23 2005.
Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.
Please add new archivals to User Talk:Lbmixpro/Archive02. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you.
Hello. I have at some point contributed about 50% of the current MInish Cap article. I am the one who added the comment about Minish CAp's music being very similar to that of WW. You removed that comment because both scores where composed before The Wind Waker. Can you please provide proof/sources of that claim? I dare say I have some knowledge of the Zelda series and I do not know in which other game these melodies appeared before THe WInd Waker. Phils 18:29, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
You seem to have done a great job taking this article toward NPOV. Thanks. Rlquall 22:24, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
We need your help again, to mediate a POV dispute between Ealva, gcessor and me. Thanks much, -- Onlytofind 05:19, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
Just wanted to give you a heads up: it's not actually protected. I would have done so myself, but I wasn't sure what your plan was. – Clockwork Soul 13:33, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I can assure you the WM X8 article is not copied from another source; I wrote the vast majority of the current version with the help of various internet accounts of the event, but did not copy them. If you need further proof of this, try Googling content phrases from the article. If you find hits anywhere other than Wikipedia or one of its mirrors, I will copyedit that section. Plagiarism is a serious accusation and you should be sure you have proof before you make it.
I've noticed that you've made a number of contributions to pro wrestling articles. You should consider joining the
Pro wrestling WikiProject. --
Chrysaor 17:33, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
Why did you move this to her real name? I've moved it back. I'm no wrestling fan, but no one ever uses her real name. It makes no sense to put the article there. Adam Bishop 23:31, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
Got your message. Darn! That'd be Onlytofind. I'm very happy to support this, but that kind of page needs a load of thought and ought to have been set up *before* posting the complaint. It's 1.30am here and I'm going away for few days tomorrow, so I can't deal with it now. RayGirvan 00:35, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
OK, dealt with, as the page had been started. RayGirvan 03:42, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
I'm very sorry that I started it late. I was just so angry over the fact that Emico is running amok inside the Wikipedia and peppering articles with personal opinion and bias.-- Onlytofind 05:18, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
Please inform me as to when and if you will take the Emico complaint to the arbitration committee.-- Onlytofind 20:36, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
His behavior has gotten even worse, check out the comment he left on Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo-- Onlytofind 20:43, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't have one for Amy Lee. I was just splitting up an article that was little more than a list of artists with their profiles. -- Xcali 00:58, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Glenn has claimed that I added the Harper paper because I wanted to bypass the vote, which is something that I didn't intend on doing, and I deeply resent Glenn's claim. It seems that he thinks everything I do is in bad intentions and that I only want to belittle the INC, even though I recently wrote the section of evangelical activities and added another link putting bloc votes into context with other Philippine religions. I have the urge to revert the article, but I'm trying to solve this problem within Wikipedia rules, and I would appreciate your help if you could also talk to Glenn about assuming good faith, because I feel that he will revert everything I write since he thinks that I have a vendetta against the INC, which I do not.-- Onlytofind 03:35, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your help, I'll see how this plays out.-- Onlytofind 21:23, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I would like to know if you think his behavior on the Iglesia ni Cristo page has warranted the creation of one.-- Onlytofind 09:16, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
See Talk:Christina_Aguilera#Protection_request - Mgm| (talk) 12:07, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Emico has been accepted and is now open. Please bring evidence to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Emico/Evidence. Thank you. -- sannse (talk) 19:02, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hi Leon, how are you doing? I believe that you have the makings of a good Administrator. How long have you been in Wiki and what are your main interests in Wiki? As you noticed in the Natalie and Nicole Albino and the Nina Sky articles. Everything written in the latter came form the article I originated, except for the first sentence. Anyway, I submitted the merge idea, so as to avoid lossing any of the edit history, to a fellow administrator User:Stormie, who quite an expert in the area. I'm glad that you have shown a great dedication to the project. Tony the Marine 05:22, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
About the vocal profile of Christina Aguilera. I noticed that you removed the profile due to the WP:CITE and WP:NOR rules. But while looking at the diff between Maxim's edit and your reversion, there was a URL citing where the profile came from. Is this source acceptable for the article? If not, why? -- LBMixPro (Speak on it!) 08:30, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
I think that allowing the article to continue without the section focusing on the controversy surrounding EVM will be a victory for some who would rather not see any criticism surrounding Mr Manalo. Nobody knows for certain (aside from the parties involved) the real truth, but I believe the newspaper links and section from Doronilla's book are still notable enough to include in the article. I felt personally that the last edit before the removal of the section was fair and neutral enough without favouring any side. If there is a way to include them without any further commentary or allegation, IMHO, that would be the best solution. -- Ironbrew 22:44, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
Thank you. &mdash Theo (Talk) 00:36, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Emico →Raul654 20:06, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
She was traded to RAW on August 22nd, no reason to change it back to Smackdown.
Check my comments at Talk:Iglesia_ni_Cristo#Deletion_of_the_Blog-- Ironbrew 22:14, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TheoClarke#Emico.27s_at_it_again.-- Ironbrew 08:31, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
Judging from the first contributions, it seemed a little less sophisticated than what Emico usually does, but since that user added the template- I have my niggling suspicions that it's Emico trying to circumvent the ban once again? Does it seem to you like it's him or not?-- Ironbrew 05:35, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
Let's face it, Emico isn't gonna stop with the proxy h4x0r1ng and he doesn't care about the ban since he'll always try to find ways around it. You suggested locking the article a few days ago and I think it's a good idea.-- Ironbrew 00:18, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
If we legitimize additions from a blocked user, isn't that tantamount to making Wikipedia law and the decision of the Arbitration Council useless? Wikipedia already banned Emico for making POV edits, if we let him back in, he will do the same and we'd be back to Square One, IMHO. -- Ironbrew 08:12, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
I read through your response and I agree with as well as respect your decision. I have no personal vendetta against Emico (except for his continous accusation of the SP towards me- which can make one really angry, since he did use SP accounts) and if he is serious about mending his ways, I promise to respect his edits and start fresh if he enters mentorship with Theo. It seems that he also needs to learn that on WP, the cardinal rule is that your contributions will be edited mercilessly and at will.-- Ironbrew 05:23, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your message on my talk page. I am not sure how you would like me to help. I like the idea of mentorship but just at present I am too busy elsewhere to do that effectively. How else my I contribute? — Theo (Talk) 09:16, 23 September 2005 (UTC)