Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the
userpage of another user may be considered
vandalism. Specifically, your edit to
User:Fablahlafuv may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to
Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you.
Kharkiv07
Talk
18:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Your recent edits may be a violation of Wikipedia policy, however I'd rather not discuss it on-wiki. If you enable the email function on your account I'd be more than happy to discuss it with you. Kharkiv07 Talk 18:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
I have amended some of your comments on another user's page, and revision-deleted prior versions. Please stop trying to identify editors by linking to Twitter; this is a violation of Wikipedia's outing policy, constitutes harrassment, and will result in your account being blocked from editing if you do it again. Yunshui 雲 水 13:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I've blocked this account. Not only is it a sockpuppet, it is violating policy in clear ways even after being warned. Appeal of this block is directly to ArbCom only. If you wish to contest this block, arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org is the address you need to contact. Courcelles ( talk) 20:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
Thank you! I was really impressed by the constructive and non-acrimonious tone and contributions from everyone involved in the recent AFD discussion on the Alliance of Women Directors article. What could have been—with the wrong editors involved—a very nasty debate, turned into a very positive discussion. Even editors who strongly felt that the article should be deleted worked hard to find sources and fix problems with it. This is the kind of positive collaboration people don't hear a lot about in Wikipedia-land and I'd like to recognize it. Carl Henderson ( talk) 19:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC) |
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the
userpage of another user may be considered
vandalism. Specifically, your edit to
User:Fablahlafuv may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to
Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you.
Kharkiv07
Talk
18:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Your recent edits may be a violation of Wikipedia policy, however I'd rather not discuss it on-wiki. If you enable the email function on your account I'd be more than happy to discuss it with you. Kharkiv07 Talk 18:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
I have amended some of your comments on another user's page, and revision-deleted prior versions. Please stop trying to identify editors by linking to Twitter; this is a violation of Wikipedia's outing policy, constitutes harrassment, and will result in your account being blocked from editing if you do it again. Yunshui 雲 水 13:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I've blocked this account. Not only is it a sockpuppet, it is violating policy in clear ways even after being warned. Appeal of this block is directly to ArbCom only. If you wish to contest this block, arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org is the address you need to contact. Courcelles ( talk) 20:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
Thank you! I was really impressed by the constructive and non-acrimonious tone and contributions from everyone involved in the recent AFD discussion on the Alliance of Women Directors article. What could have been—with the wrong editors involved—a very nasty debate, turned into a very positive discussion. Even editors who strongly felt that the article should be deleted worked hard to find sources and fix problems with it. This is the kind of positive collaboration people don't hear a lot about in Wikipedia-land and I'd like to recognize it. Carl Henderson ( talk) 19:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC) |