![]() | Microsoft no longer seems to support this tool. Future development is unlikely and bugs won't be fixed. You might want to experiment with the Content translation tool instead. |
I installed the gadget and it added the link in the Sidebar successfully, but didn't add the new button to the edit screen. Kaldari ( talk) 22:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the tool, however when I click on its button, I've got:
Unable to launch WikiBhasha TypeError: this._mouseInit is not a function
And it stops.
I work on an HP Pavillon dv9000 with Firefox 3.6.12. JackPotte ( talk) 10:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
I tested WikiBhasha on Mac OSX ( snow leopard ) with firefox 3.2.12 and safari 5.0.2. and WikiBhasha is working correctly as a gadget. Please provide information about how you installed the WikiBhasha gadget script. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anilande ( talk • contribs) 06:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello WikiBhasha.MSR. It is not clear from your user page whether you are an individual or a team but I will assume you are the one who made all the recent additions to the WP article.
While it is useful to have a user guide about WikiBhasha, the normal principles of Wikipedia article writing still need to be addressed. I have tried to make a start in this direction by transforming the text into a descriptive account rather than a set a instructions for the user. However, the article is still in need of proper referencing (at least one reference per paragraph) including, wherever possible, third-party references. (If not, it is likely to be plastered with citation needed tags.) Suitable sources could include, for example, newspaper articles, reviews of the tools, quality assessments, etc. At the moment, it looks to me as if your contribution would be more appropriate for inclusion under Wikipedia:Tools where there would be no need to present it all in the form of an encyclopedic article. Perhaps you could consider doing both? You could include the user-oriented instructions under Wikipedia:Tools while using the main article as a general description of the tool with third-party assessments.
I suggest you also take a look at the Google translate article for some ideas. While further work is required there too, the article does give a number of references and also cites some of the problems. I hope this will be helpful. Good luck! - Ipigott ( talk) 12:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
i tried to file a bug:
and it was redirected to here. wikibasha overlays the top line of wikipedia (user, talk, sandbox, ...), see screenshot attached to the bug. -- ThurnerRupert ( talk) 12:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | Microsoft no longer seems to support this tool. Future development is unlikely and bugs won't be fixed. You might want to experiment with the Content translation tool instead. |
I installed the gadget and it added the link in the Sidebar successfully, but didn't add the new button to the edit screen. Kaldari ( talk) 22:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the tool, however when I click on its button, I've got:
Unable to launch WikiBhasha TypeError: this._mouseInit is not a function
And it stops.
I work on an HP Pavillon dv9000 with Firefox 3.6.12. JackPotte ( talk) 10:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
I tested WikiBhasha on Mac OSX ( snow leopard ) with firefox 3.2.12 and safari 5.0.2. and WikiBhasha is working correctly as a gadget. Please provide information about how you installed the WikiBhasha gadget script. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anilande ( talk • contribs) 06:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello WikiBhasha.MSR. It is not clear from your user page whether you are an individual or a team but I will assume you are the one who made all the recent additions to the WP article.
While it is useful to have a user guide about WikiBhasha, the normal principles of Wikipedia article writing still need to be addressed. I have tried to make a start in this direction by transforming the text into a descriptive account rather than a set a instructions for the user. However, the article is still in need of proper referencing (at least one reference per paragraph) including, wherever possible, third-party references. (If not, it is likely to be plastered with citation needed tags.) Suitable sources could include, for example, newspaper articles, reviews of the tools, quality assessments, etc. At the moment, it looks to me as if your contribution would be more appropriate for inclusion under Wikipedia:Tools where there would be no need to present it all in the form of an encyclopedic article. Perhaps you could consider doing both? You could include the user-oriented instructions under Wikipedia:Tools while using the main article as a general description of the tool with third-party assessments.
I suggest you also take a look at the Google translate article for some ideas. While further work is required there too, the article does give a number of references and also cites some of the problems. I hope this will be helpful. Good luck! - Ipigott ( talk) 12:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
i tried to file a bug:
and it was redirected to here. wikibasha overlays the top line of wikipedia (user, talk, sandbox, ...), see screenshot attached to the bug. -- ThurnerRupert ( talk) 12:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)