Wikaviani,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–
Davey2010
Talk 00:12, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
You might find this article of interest. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Islam#Some_issues_with_the_current_Wikipedia_Quran_articles
Koreangauteng ( talk) 00:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello Wikaviani,
Do you remember last year that there was a discussion about whether Pashtun(Or Afghan) hindus/sikhs were of Pashtun ethnicity. wit the help of this source Shashank was arguing it. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tattooed-blue-skinned-hindu-pushtuns-look-back-at-their-roots/article22645932.ece and we placed as Disputed as all sources did not prove the full Ethnic Pashtun Hindus.
It was known by many sources that there are not ethnical Pashtuns (or Afghans) but of Punjabi ancestry and therefore should be placed in the Hindki or Hindkowan pages. But Shashank the Indian-sided wikipedian did not agree with that as he said that they were not of Punjabi ancestry but are 100% Pashtun. So now after one year I found the source that these "Pashtun Hindus" themselves say that they are of Punjabi ancestry. https://www.thebetterindia.com/155394/hindu-pashtun-shilpi-batra-sheenkhalai-afghanistan/
So whats the discussion now: Whether to place the These Pashto speaking Punjabi ancestry Hindus in the Hindki Hindkowan pages or in the Pashtuns page. As you were in there last year, can you give your personal opinion on the Talk page I pinged you. It would be great as you are aware of the discussion. Thank you Casperti ( talk) 16:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello Wikaviani,
I noticed that a few months back you did a nice job of monitoring and reverting edits by spam accounts on the Azerbaijani language page. There has been a lot of activity there recently with deletions of sources in order to push the idea that North and South Azerbaijani are not different languages. If you could help out by monitoring again to prevent this persistent vandalism it would be very kind. Monopoly31121993(2) ( talk) 11:10, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs)
I have read your message and i gave the reasons that the source which complained by HistoryofIran as non-scholarly. so please tell me, does Drk Khalid Basalamah title of Master of Arts in the field of Islamic history(Seerah) from Islamic University of Madinah has been ruled out from Wikipedia academic source? Ahendra ( talk) 21:06, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
hi. can you correct infobox and help me. dont delete it. Berosya ( talk) 11:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello Wikaviani,
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
If you change values you need to add a reference to support. [1]
Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 22:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
you changed recoveries from 16 to 2 for Germany. this is wrong. we have at least 16 + 1 recoveries.
https://www.ksta.de/koeln/coronavirus-in-koeln-stadt-bestaetigt-15-faelle---soldat-geheilt-aus-klinik-entlassen-36349934 "Kölner Soldat nach Corona-Infektion geheilt aus Klinik entlassen"
Hi please check out List of castles in Iran Because my English is poor And maybe new words are vague. Thank you M.k.m2003 ( talk) 19:43, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani: Please, do not add a duplicate source for Woldometer in this article ( [2]), since it as already defined. You can use it with a cross-reference with <ref name="WOMC"/> Thank you. -- MarioGom ( talk) 15:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
In response to your ping, my area of expertise is history not so much genetics(ie. biology). My suggestion is take that source to the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and see what other editors say. And, unfortunately, I can not recall any editors that specialize in genetic editing. You might ask Doug Weller and/or Ymblanter. Sorry I could not help you. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 15:11, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Hey, Wikaviani, how are you? I would like to know if you would be willing to join me in petitioning a change to the rules at SPI, namely the policy of not using CheckUser to link IP addresses to potential socks. The way I see it, it weakens the power of SPI if anyone can just make edits on an IP to evade scrutiny, at a time when this website is literally plagued with sockpuppets and saboteurs. Perhaps there is a way to conceal IPs when CheckUser is requested, so only admins can see them? Let me know your thoughts, and take care. - Hunan201p ( talk) 06:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
I saw your ping and I recommend using WP:RSN to see if that research is reliable or not. Even if it passes as RS, there are other genetic studies with different results and summaries. So if that source is legit, then other studies should be cited (neutralizing and WP:WEIGHT); e.g. take a look at this:
Cheers! -- Wario-Man ( talk) 02:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi there Wikaviani,
The map there that you replaced on Central Asia was not placed by me but was there for a long time (decade ago?). A now blocked user Jirgen666 constantly removed it to make his statement true. "Include Mongolia too if Afghanistan is included in a map, or just delete it". He had some good points, and if you check the edit history you can see I did change the info (Latitudal theory of Humboldt). But anyways you can check his block log and contributions. He was violating the rules and got blocked. It was a one-purpose account, that really made a mess. The map that contains Afghanistan is in the definition section and was not placed by me. Afghanistan is the most common addition to the core definition of Central Asia that's why the map is there I guess.
but there was already a consensus for it several years ago, Wario-man did not agree with that map (If I read it correctly on the talk page). But others agreed to it because Afghanistan is definitely considered a Central Asian country (and South Asian too for political reasons) but not a core central Asian nation.
Here are some example sources why: The most common country that is added to the Central Asian list besides the core post-soviet states is
Anyways just so you know, I did not add the map it was there for a long time and only in the "definition section"
Have a good one :) Casperti ( talk) 23:42, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
FYI
Confirmed & blocked. You can strikethrough all of his comments. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 05:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. ~Swarm~ {sting} 03:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Wikaviani. In Salih I ibn Mansur article the source says Ya'qubi was citing a local opinion, is this considered reliable? And can it be presented as a source in the article? MWahaiibii ( talk) 18:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
@ MWahaiibii and TheseusHeLl: That source sounds reliable, that said, if the current wording is not convenient for you, feel free to reword it with an inline cite from the source. Do not hesitate if you think that you need any help. Cheers.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 20:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, one last thing. User TheseusHeLl made major edits in the List of pre-modern Arab scientists and scholars, removing entries that had been there since a very long time claiming original research, which i have no problem with. But shouldn't we be talking about them in the talk page instead of deleting more than 50 scholars in few edits. Again sorry for the disturbance. - MWahaiibii ( talk) 22:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani,
I hope you are doing well. I was just looking through the edit-history of an editor who is causing some trouble on Calculus, and I noticed the following sequence of edits, all from here:
Since both editors involved seem troublesome, it is not easy for me to guess which one is right. And I personally have no expertise. But I saw that you have edited the article in the past, so maybe you can tell if the addition is appropriate?
Thanks very much, JBL ( talk) 15:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
@ Joel B. Lewis: Finally, the source was described as being unreliable per this thread, thus, i reverted Prototypehumanoid's edit. Cheers.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 22:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Hey Wikaviani, is al-a'lam by Khayr al-Din al-Zirikli reliable for the ethnicity of Al-Tahawi. I know that it's a tertiary source (a tarajim: biographies), but I don't know its reliability. Regards - TheseusHeLl ( talk) 23:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. I know you were well-meaning when you put four tags on Rhizopogon salebrosus, but inline citations are not required unless something is a direct quote or likely to be challenged. The general references that the author included in the "References" section of the article clearly showed the species notability, which means that neither the "notability" or "no citations" tags you put on the article were correct. A better one would be the "no footnotes" tag. Please use that next time.
Please be more careful. The editor who originally wrote the article tried to blank their otherwise acceptable page. It wasn't perfect, and I added their references as inline citations, but bombing a page with incorrect tags 17 minutes after creation is not okay and scares away new editors. Please don't bite the newbies. Thank you. Mcampany ( talk) 03:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey there. Care to explain your revert here? Al-Andalusi ( talk) 00:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Would you like to explain your inexplicable mass-reversion? I removed no cited material. "sourced content removal"? That's quite a charge. Ogress 01:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Adds Amol to every article he touches. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 12:47, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello Wikaviani,
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kabuli palaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khorasan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:15, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Could you take a look at this article? The citations and claims do not look reliable and legit. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 16:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
dude Cyrus the Great died on that fay THEREALhistoryandgames ( talk) 22:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Day* THEREALhistoryandgames ( talk) 22:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
His article THEREALhistoryandgames ( talk) 12:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
how is Wikipedia not a reliable source How is an Encyclopedia with an strict editing policy unreliable THEREALhistoryandgames ( talk) 12:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
That article didn't help my point still stands THEREALhistoryandgames ( talk) 01:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you remember me I do not speak English well But I like to have activities on the English wik, I made edits on the Kashmar page today, Content is a little too much And I do not know if the translation was correct or not, If possible, please do a review And confirm the correctness of the article، Thank you M.k.m2003 ( talk) 13:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello there, thanks for your clarification HERE, even though I disagree with you! However, I don't understand, why did you revert my edit? Thanks, and peace.-- TheEagle107 ( talk) 14:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
It looks like some kind of POV-pushing. The cited source seems legit but the wording and the representation of that source may be fishy/POV. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 08:53, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
See here.-- Kansas Bear ( talk) 01:26, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
See here. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 20:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
why you revert my edits? Nader shah was from turkoman afshar tribe and his soldiers were not persians
He and his army were NOT persian don't you understand?-- 85.104.66.113 ( talk) 23:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
He was not a persian. Persian is ethnicity. He is turkmen. Stop stealing history. And also why did you delete the edits I made at the Battle of garni? i do not change only numbers
Wikaviani,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–
Davey2010
Talk 00:12, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
You might find this article of interest. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Islam#Some_issues_with_the_current_Wikipedia_Quran_articles
Koreangauteng ( talk) 00:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello Wikaviani,
Do you remember last year that there was a discussion about whether Pashtun(Or Afghan) hindus/sikhs were of Pashtun ethnicity. wit the help of this source Shashank was arguing it. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tattooed-blue-skinned-hindu-pushtuns-look-back-at-their-roots/article22645932.ece and we placed as Disputed as all sources did not prove the full Ethnic Pashtun Hindus.
It was known by many sources that there are not ethnical Pashtuns (or Afghans) but of Punjabi ancestry and therefore should be placed in the Hindki or Hindkowan pages. But Shashank the Indian-sided wikipedian did not agree with that as he said that they were not of Punjabi ancestry but are 100% Pashtun. So now after one year I found the source that these "Pashtun Hindus" themselves say that they are of Punjabi ancestry. https://www.thebetterindia.com/155394/hindu-pashtun-shilpi-batra-sheenkhalai-afghanistan/
So whats the discussion now: Whether to place the These Pashto speaking Punjabi ancestry Hindus in the Hindki Hindkowan pages or in the Pashtuns page. As you were in there last year, can you give your personal opinion on the Talk page I pinged you. It would be great as you are aware of the discussion. Thank you Casperti ( talk) 16:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello Wikaviani,
I noticed that a few months back you did a nice job of monitoring and reverting edits by spam accounts on the Azerbaijani language page. There has been a lot of activity there recently with deletions of sources in order to push the idea that North and South Azerbaijani are not different languages. If you could help out by monitoring again to prevent this persistent vandalism it would be very kind. Monopoly31121993(2) ( talk) 11:10, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs)
I have read your message and i gave the reasons that the source which complained by HistoryofIran as non-scholarly. so please tell me, does Drk Khalid Basalamah title of Master of Arts in the field of Islamic history(Seerah) from Islamic University of Madinah has been ruled out from Wikipedia academic source? Ahendra ( talk) 21:06, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
hi. can you correct infobox and help me. dont delete it. Berosya ( talk) 11:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello Wikaviani,
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
If you change values you need to add a reference to support. [1]
Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 22:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
you changed recoveries from 16 to 2 for Germany. this is wrong. we have at least 16 + 1 recoveries.
https://www.ksta.de/koeln/coronavirus-in-koeln-stadt-bestaetigt-15-faelle---soldat-geheilt-aus-klinik-entlassen-36349934 "Kölner Soldat nach Corona-Infektion geheilt aus Klinik entlassen"
Hi please check out List of castles in Iran Because my English is poor And maybe new words are vague. Thank you M.k.m2003 ( talk) 19:43, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani: Please, do not add a duplicate source for Woldometer in this article ( [2]), since it as already defined. You can use it with a cross-reference with <ref name="WOMC"/> Thank you. -- MarioGom ( talk) 15:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
In response to your ping, my area of expertise is history not so much genetics(ie. biology). My suggestion is take that source to the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and see what other editors say. And, unfortunately, I can not recall any editors that specialize in genetic editing. You might ask Doug Weller and/or Ymblanter. Sorry I could not help you. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 15:11, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Hey, Wikaviani, how are you? I would like to know if you would be willing to join me in petitioning a change to the rules at SPI, namely the policy of not using CheckUser to link IP addresses to potential socks. The way I see it, it weakens the power of SPI if anyone can just make edits on an IP to evade scrutiny, at a time when this website is literally plagued with sockpuppets and saboteurs. Perhaps there is a way to conceal IPs when CheckUser is requested, so only admins can see them? Let me know your thoughts, and take care. - Hunan201p ( talk) 06:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
I saw your ping and I recommend using WP:RSN to see if that research is reliable or not. Even if it passes as RS, there are other genetic studies with different results and summaries. So if that source is legit, then other studies should be cited (neutralizing and WP:WEIGHT); e.g. take a look at this:
Cheers! -- Wario-Man ( talk) 02:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi there Wikaviani,
The map there that you replaced on Central Asia was not placed by me but was there for a long time (decade ago?). A now blocked user Jirgen666 constantly removed it to make his statement true. "Include Mongolia too if Afghanistan is included in a map, or just delete it". He had some good points, and if you check the edit history you can see I did change the info (Latitudal theory of Humboldt). But anyways you can check his block log and contributions. He was violating the rules and got blocked. It was a one-purpose account, that really made a mess. The map that contains Afghanistan is in the definition section and was not placed by me. Afghanistan is the most common addition to the core definition of Central Asia that's why the map is there I guess.
but there was already a consensus for it several years ago, Wario-man did not agree with that map (If I read it correctly on the talk page). But others agreed to it because Afghanistan is definitely considered a Central Asian country (and South Asian too for political reasons) but not a core central Asian nation.
Here are some example sources why: The most common country that is added to the Central Asian list besides the core post-soviet states is
Anyways just so you know, I did not add the map it was there for a long time and only in the "definition section"
Have a good one :) Casperti ( talk) 23:42, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
FYI
Confirmed & blocked. You can strikethrough all of his comments. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 05:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. ~Swarm~ {sting} 03:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Wikaviani. In Salih I ibn Mansur article the source says Ya'qubi was citing a local opinion, is this considered reliable? And can it be presented as a source in the article? MWahaiibii ( talk) 18:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
@ MWahaiibii and TheseusHeLl: That source sounds reliable, that said, if the current wording is not convenient for you, feel free to reword it with an inline cite from the source. Do not hesitate if you think that you need any help. Cheers.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 20:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, one last thing. User TheseusHeLl made major edits in the List of pre-modern Arab scientists and scholars, removing entries that had been there since a very long time claiming original research, which i have no problem with. But shouldn't we be talking about them in the talk page instead of deleting more than 50 scholars in few edits. Again sorry for the disturbance. - MWahaiibii ( talk) 22:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani,
I hope you are doing well. I was just looking through the edit-history of an editor who is causing some trouble on Calculus, and I noticed the following sequence of edits, all from here:
Since both editors involved seem troublesome, it is not easy for me to guess which one is right. And I personally have no expertise. But I saw that you have edited the article in the past, so maybe you can tell if the addition is appropriate?
Thanks very much, JBL ( talk) 15:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
@ Joel B. Lewis: Finally, the source was described as being unreliable per this thread, thus, i reverted Prototypehumanoid's edit. Cheers.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 22:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Hey Wikaviani, is al-a'lam by Khayr al-Din al-Zirikli reliable for the ethnicity of Al-Tahawi. I know that it's a tertiary source (a tarajim: biographies), but I don't know its reliability. Regards - TheseusHeLl ( talk) 23:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. I know you were well-meaning when you put four tags on Rhizopogon salebrosus, but inline citations are not required unless something is a direct quote or likely to be challenged. The general references that the author included in the "References" section of the article clearly showed the species notability, which means that neither the "notability" or "no citations" tags you put on the article were correct. A better one would be the "no footnotes" tag. Please use that next time.
Please be more careful. The editor who originally wrote the article tried to blank their otherwise acceptable page. It wasn't perfect, and I added their references as inline citations, but bombing a page with incorrect tags 17 minutes after creation is not okay and scares away new editors. Please don't bite the newbies. Thank you. Mcampany ( talk) 03:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey there. Care to explain your revert here? Al-Andalusi ( talk) 00:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Would you like to explain your inexplicable mass-reversion? I removed no cited material. "sourced content removal"? That's quite a charge. Ogress 01:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Adds Amol to every article he touches. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 12:47, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello Wikaviani,
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kabuli palaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khorasan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:15, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Could you take a look at this article? The citations and claims do not look reliable and legit. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 16:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
dude Cyrus the Great died on that fay THEREALhistoryandgames ( talk) 22:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Day* THEREALhistoryandgames ( talk) 22:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
His article THEREALhistoryandgames ( talk) 12:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
how is Wikipedia not a reliable source How is an Encyclopedia with an strict editing policy unreliable THEREALhistoryandgames ( talk) 12:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
That article didn't help my point still stands THEREALhistoryandgames ( talk) 01:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you remember me I do not speak English well But I like to have activities on the English wik, I made edits on the Kashmar page today, Content is a little too much And I do not know if the translation was correct or not, If possible, please do a review And confirm the correctness of the article، Thank you M.k.m2003 ( talk) 13:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello there, thanks for your clarification HERE, even though I disagree with you! However, I don't understand, why did you revert my edit? Thanks, and peace.-- TheEagle107 ( talk) 14:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
It looks like some kind of POV-pushing. The cited source seems legit but the wording and the representation of that source may be fishy/POV. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 08:53, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
See here.-- Kansas Bear ( talk) 01:26, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
See here. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 20:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
why you revert my edits? Nader shah was from turkoman afshar tribe and his soldiers were not persians
He and his army were NOT persian don't you understand?-- 85.104.66.113 ( talk) 23:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
He was not a persian. Persian is ethnicity. He is turkmen. Stop stealing history. And also why did you delete the edits I made at the Battle of garni? i do not change only numbers