This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wheatinvest ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

Nothing to mediate. You're here not to write the encyclopedia, but to promote your website. Unblock request denied, page protected. MaxSem^{( Han shot first!)} 18:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request For Assistance

Hello,

I want to resolve this with mediation. My intent was always to expand the detail of the Wiki Article and not spam. I have created theirEarth.com to help the Planet and Hu12 has just blocked all aspects of my account without even contacting me first and asking me to remove the articles. Also Hu12 has written http://spam.theirEarth.com against the URL which is really not fair.

All articles on the site are designed to further the knowledge of the subject areas that is to provide good to the Planet. If you could let me know how to resolve this issue with fairness within Wikipedia through fair mediation, because I would like to remain an active member. I am not even able to write in the Mediation Cabal as I have no edit rights. How do I request mediation?

Thanks

Accounts

Theirearth ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Wheatinvest ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
80.11.131.211 ( talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
80.11.170.108 ( talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for spamming inappropriate external links or self-promotion, so it has been blocked indefinitely. Wikipedia is NOT a " repository of links" or a " vehicle for advertising" and persistent spammers will also have their websites blacklisted.

-- Hu12 ( talk) 09:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wheatinvest ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I run a web site that is designed to help the Planet theirEarth.com), and I am offended that Hu12 has taken all of the linked articles that I put up (which contain detail researched by me) that help to expand upon the knowledge base of each Wikipedia subject. They are not spam. If you look at each article they contain valid facts in much more detail than is in the Wiki in most instances. My article on Sterling Energy Systems is not SPAM it is well researched. I would ask that you review Hu12's ability to be an Administrator at Wikipedia. I have looked at what is allowed from evworld and treehugger and this has no detail whatsoever that helps the content. Thanks for your consideration in advance. Take care Christopher

Decline reason:

It is inappropriate for you to link to your own site. See WP:COI, WP:SPAM, WP:EL, and WP:NOT. — Yamla ( talk) 16:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.