This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Hi. Have you examined using URL/web-host blacklists like SURBL ( http://www.surbl.org) or the domains it gets info from as part of the spam link detector? Allens ( talk | contribs) 03:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, Lotje! I have moved the barnstar to the "awards" section of the WP:STiki page. West.andrew.g ( talk) 14:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Please reply if Stiki has keyboard shortcuts, i am unable to find them , if it does not have keyboard short cuts then it would be a good idea to include them, regards , thanks-- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 03:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Also can you please let me know if there is a way to see the difference in the number of characters in the diff, (like the one shown on huggle or the page history on wiki articles), regards -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 04:14, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
On the "Stiki Diff Screen" how do you scroll the page down ? is there a shortcut key for this? as of now the pg down or the cursor down button does not do it and i have to do it by leaving the keyboard and using the mouse repeatedly. Please excuse me for asking this but i tried looking for this in the Stiki documentations as well but could not find it. thanks-- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 14:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
hi Andrew, I must first thank you for the tool Stiki, its fast, wonderful and mostly shows you the cases that you need to see. but i think adding one more revert button for unsourced content or comment wont be too bad. (not all of them but just the commonly used ones) you can also have a look at my talk page here [1] Thanks and regards -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 15:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Chiming in here as an interested editor who has seen several editors misusing STiki. It seems to me, it is very necessary to have a button for good faith edits. The button could generate a edit summary along the lines of Twinkle's like "Reverting good faith edit(s) by Joeditor to last revision by...".
I would like to take this opportunity to express the need for this change with an example from a while ago. I hate to single anyone out but this user of STiki was getting hounded by so many other editors (myself being one of them) that it drove him to place this [2] at the top of his talk page. He was repeatedly being warned [3] about misusing STiki and making false accusations of vandalism (admittedly, looking back on it, I don't think I, and maybe some other editors, handled this the best way possible). It became clear that the editor had a strong desire to continue using STiki despite the fact he knew it was going to issue false vandalism warnings in his behalf. He did not want to accuse so many other users of something they did not do, but he didn't see it as an important or compelling enough reason to stop using the tool as he had grown accustomed.
Now you may say this editor was acting irresponsibly and I would agree, but the fact is, a lot of arguing, tense words, wasted threads, false vandalism accusations and hard feelings would have been avoided if the user simply had another option at hand for an edit summary. The user now edits with Huggle and STiki, I believe, and has not caused any trouble since that I am aware. This goes to show that even in the hands of an otherwise very good editor, the tool can very easily lead to misuse just because of a single technical limitation it has. In effect, it can "bring out the worst" in some of us. Just my, for what its two cents worth. I know you have already said you intend to add such an option. Thank you for your time.-- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 23:11, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
IF you expect to need a toolserver account, I suggest applying sooner rather than later. In my experience it's not a quick process; you can expect to wait at least a month. Josh Parris 01:14, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Is there a way that STiki can run as a Wikipedia script (on my monobook.js page) or a Firefox extension or plugin? What about a Greasemonkey script? Allen ( talk) 21:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Dear Andrew, Thanks for accepting our suggestions and recommendations in your latest release above, I have tried it and I must say that I am glad to use the new version. The "rollback derived differences" was much needed, I can now clearly see what changes my revert will make. I hope the scroll down feature will soon come up. Thanks, the 100,000 milestone is fast approaching, be ready with your Champagne bottle -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 21:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you all for the barnstars, I've moved them over to the "awards" section over at WP:STiki. Thanks! West.andrew.g ( talk) 16:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
While performing some data analysis, I ran into your account as an oddity because some of your activity resembled bot-like activity, yet you do not have a bot flag. Upon review of the bot-like edits, I see a ton of structured edits from your account over the course of nearly a year. Are you operating a bot (external automated program that edits the wiki) through your user account? If so, please cease doing so immediately and contact WP:BAG for approval of a bot-flagged account to run your bot under. If not, how is it that you are making several edits/second for weeks at a time? -- EpochFail( talk| work) 18:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello Andrew, Welsh Dragon edit by STiki Earlier yesterday evening I noticed a Welsh Dragon edit by STiki. I investigated your article page – and this page ... liked your idea ... downloaded, and ... nothing! Where/how will it show up on my computer? ... how do I access STiki? What should I do next? Your assistance would be much appreciated. King regards, Gareth Griffith-Jones ( talk) 11:55, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
See stiki talk page.-- Deathlaser ( talk) 17:03, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I was thinking about the idea of a "meta" queue combining data from, say, the Cluebot-NG and STiki (metadata) queues. The most obvious form of such is to take the Cluebot-NG feed and check to see if its output also falls afoul of the STiki (metadata) detection system (using current thresholds or, if need be for getting some output if the two mechanisms should not intersect very much in their output, more relaxed ones). This idea is obvious enough that I'm sure you've thought of it. As a modification of it, I suggest having a fusion as follows:
The advantages of this are as follows (there may be others):
Your thoughts? Allens ( talk | contribs) 10:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
You mentioned in your post on my talk page that you are looking for collaborators, I would be happy to help! - Mcfar54
OK, well I feel that 100 is possibly a little low. I myself can amass 100 hundred edits on STiki in one sitting and in a short amount of time, if the vandalism rate is particularly high. Having not seen the stats for any STiki users, I propose something along the following lines:
These seem like much more satisfying levels with which to distribute an award, and it shows both trust and dedication when utilising the tool. The large difference between the edit-counts also makes an award seem more deserved and well-earned. 5,000 is a possibility, or we could have 10,000 as the next level up?
Finally, would we distribute standard Wikipedia barnstars found over at the barnstar page, or create stars that are more personal to STiki? Orphan Wiki ( talk) 11:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Andrew apart from {{ STiki topicon}} I have created 3 userboxes (see below). They automatically include users in the Category:Wikipedians who use STiki I have also tweaked the two existing Stiki userboxes [4] and [5] to include users of the 2 existing userbox into this category Please do have look, you can revert these edits if you dont agree with them, thanks and regards -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 22:09, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
User Box | Code |
---|---|
Goes to top right corner of the page (see) | {{ STiki topicon}} |
User:DBigXray/userbox/STiki 2 | {{User:DBigXray/userbox/STiki 2}} |
User:DBigXray/userbox/STiki | {{User:DBigXray/userbox/STiki}} |
User:DBigXray/STiki UserBox 3 | {{User:DBigXray/STiki UserBox 3}} |
Created a new one... if people are interested:
User Box | Code | |
---|---|---|
|
Yaris678 ( talk) 23:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Andrew,
It is good to see STiki growing in popularity. I am slightly concerned that the more popular it gets, the more difficult it will be for you to keep track of users who might be misusing STiki (either deliberately or through ignorance).
I guess this is similar to a problem they had in the earlyish days of Wikipedia, when they said "Jimbo doesn’t scale". One approach would be to insist on users having the Rollback right (as per T#005) but this has the potential to keep out good users. I guess another approach would be to give some trusted users access to your tools for checking that users aren’t abusing the system… However... I think I have a cleverer idea than either of these. I am hoping you will like it because it is taking a quantitative approach to the trust of STiki users.
I am essentially suggesting a peer-checking system. The more users you have the more beneficial this becomes. This idea is inspired by the user-based moderation system of Slashdot, but it is slightly different. The simplest way it could work is that when a user says that an edit is innocent, it is sometimes put back in the queue and fed to a different user (in the same way as if they had pressed "pass"). It can then be recorded whether the second user gave the same answer as the first. A slightly more advance version would have two new hidden queues, one for edits "innocented" by inexperienced editors to be sent to experienced editors and one edits "innocented" by experienced editors to be sent to inexperienced editors... and assume that the experienced editor is always right... unless they end up disagreeing with a lot of other users in which case there may be something weird going on. You could use this to quickly identify users who press either innocent of revert when they shouldn’t. You could make it so that the newest STiki users get a lot of edits referred on. You could also make it so that if you are identified as pressing innocent too much it increases the proportion of edits that are referred on... hopefully this will allow the system to collect enough evidence to show that it was a temporary blip and the rate can go back down... but if not the rate will go up until you reach the point where all "innocenting" by the user is rechecked.
If a user is identified as reverting too much then they need to be stopped from using STki relatively quickly. I guess some kind of intervention would be required at that point, to look at all their past edits and see what needs undoing.
An alternative/additional approach involves checking edits from the recent-changes API to see if they are reverts of STiki reverts. If one is, STiki could automatically add the new edit at the top of its queue... and then look to see what a different user makes of the edit. This wouldn’t check for over-use of the "innocent" button but it would have the advantage that if the edit was correctly identified as vandalism the first time around then it is good that it back at the top of the queue!
Yaris678 ( talk) 17:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Andrew, More thoughts on this:
Yaris678 ( talk) 12:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Andrew, I have updated Wikipedia:STiki#Directions_for_using_STiki Please check, Although I had not consulted you before updating the page, I felt it was needed for new users who want to understand how to use it, I was asked about it by a user so I thought of putting it here as well, what is your opinion ? . feel free to revert me anytime. -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 14:16, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Have you considered (for English and similar languages only, of course) using as features:
Vandalism using random keys tends to have a low proportion of vowels. Allens ( talk | contribs) 17:40, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey, is there any way to use STiki on Wikimedia Commons? If not, can you please make a version for that? Best, Dipankan says.. ( "Be bold and edit!") 15:09, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Sorted as in, if vandalism pops up, then users revert it the old fashioned way. That is for text. Click on undo manually. Also, I take back my comment. I just love the STiki interface. : ) -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 18:51, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Heya, just to let you know, Huggle, another Wiki anti vandal tool has been translated into Hindi. Can the same translations be used for STiki? I don't mind doing a little additional work. -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 18:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, have you ever thought of having a Flattr button on your website? -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 18:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks DBigXRay! Award moved to the "awards" section of the main WP:STiki page. Thanks! West.andrew.g ( talk) 20:52, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Significant changes were rolled out in this version, causing the version number to bump up 2.0 -> 2.1. Many of these were front-end modifications to the GUI. These feature requests were a little easier to accommodate than I had expected, meaning: (a) STiki has a nice organizational framework or (b) I've screwed up and I am about to be bombarded with bug reports. The major changes are as follows:
As always, thank you for your continued use of the STiki tool. Please report any bugs you encounters. Shortly STiki will past the 100,000 revert mark, and this should be a great milestone in the software's history! Thanks, West.andrew.g ( talk) 16:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I would quite like to help with stiki but I don't really know how I can. I could do some beta testing if needed. Cheers, Willdude123|Ƹ21ɘbublliW ( talk) 13:09, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
OK, so we're thinking about developing a welcome message for newer users of STiki and also a series of barnstars, recognising the attainment of a certain quantity of edits, the amounts of which we have discussed above. The first that I will help to address is the former. I thought it'd be best to begin a fresh thread, to make things easier to sift through in sections, and also to isolate certain points of interest and thus maximise focus and attention.
A welcome message will have to be built around a number of links to various pages within our STiki community. For a start, I think we should all think about which pages would be the best to include (as internal links) in the STiki welcome template here, before the scribing of the template commences. Obviously the pages of the most relevance and use to a newbie will be inserted. Thoughts? Orphan Wiki ( talk) 17:09, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
I saw in your block log that you once got blocked for running scripts without BAG approval. Did you get BAG approval? How? -- Tomtomn00 ( talk • contributions) 12:25, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Hi. Have you examined using URL/web-host blacklists like SURBL ( http://www.surbl.org) or the domains it gets info from as part of the spam link detector? Allens ( talk | contribs) 03:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, Lotje! I have moved the barnstar to the "awards" section of the WP:STiki page. West.andrew.g ( talk) 14:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Please reply if Stiki has keyboard shortcuts, i am unable to find them , if it does not have keyboard short cuts then it would be a good idea to include them, regards , thanks-- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 03:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Also can you please let me know if there is a way to see the difference in the number of characters in the diff, (like the one shown on huggle or the page history on wiki articles), regards -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 04:14, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
On the "Stiki Diff Screen" how do you scroll the page down ? is there a shortcut key for this? as of now the pg down or the cursor down button does not do it and i have to do it by leaving the keyboard and using the mouse repeatedly. Please excuse me for asking this but i tried looking for this in the Stiki documentations as well but could not find it. thanks-- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 14:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
hi Andrew, I must first thank you for the tool Stiki, its fast, wonderful and mostly shows you the cases that you need to see. but i think adding one more revert button for unsourced content or comment wont be too bad. (not all of them but just the commonly used ones) you can also have a look at my talk page here [1] Thanks and regards -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 15:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Chiming in here as an interested editor who has seen several editors misusing STiki. It seems to me, it is very necessary to have a button for good faith edits. The button could generate a edit summary along the lines of Twinkle's like "Reverting good faith edit(s) by Joeditor to last revision by...".
I would like to take this opportunity to express the need for this change with an example from a while ago. I hate to single anyone out but this user of STiki was getting hounded by so many other editors (myself being one of them) that it drove him to place this [2] at the top of his talk page. He was repeatedly being warned [3] about misusing STiki and making false accusations of vandalism (admittedly, looking back on it, I don't think I, and maybe some other editors, handled this the best way possible). It became clear that the editor had a strong desire to continue using STiki despite the fact he knew it was going to issue false vandalism warnings in his behalf. He did not want to accuse so many other users of something they did not do, but he didn't see it as an important or compelling enough reason to stop using the tool as he had grown accustomed.
Now you may say this editor was acting irresponsibly and I would agree, but the fact is, a lot of arguing, tense words, wasted threads, false vandalism accusations and hard feelings would have been avoided if the user simply had another option at hand for an edit summary. The user now edits with Huggle and STiki, I believe, and has not caused any trouble since that I am aware. This goes to show that even in the hands of an otherwise very good editor, the tool can very easily lead to misuse just because of a single technical limitation it has. In effect, it can "bring out the worst" in some of us. Just my, for what its two cents worth. I know you have already said you intend to add such an option. Thank you for your time.-- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 23:11, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
IF you expect to need a toolserver account, I suggest applying sooner rather than later. In my experience it's not a quick process; you can expect to wait at least a month. Josh Parris 01:14, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Is there a way that STiki can run as a Wikipedia script (on my monobook.js page) or a Firefox extension or plugin? What about a Greasemonkey script? Allen ( talk) 21:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Dear Andrew, Thanks for accepting our suggestions and recommendations in your latest release above, I have tried it and I must say that I am glad to use the new version. The "rollback derived differences" was much needed, I can now clearly see what changes my revert will make. I hope the scroll down feature will soon come up. Thanks, the 100,000 milestone is fast approaching, be ready with your Champagne bottle -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 21:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you all for the barnstars, I've moved them over to the "awards" section over at WP:STiki. Thanks! West.andrew.g ( talk) 16:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
While performing some data analysis, I ran into your account as an oddity because some of your activity resembled bot-like activity, yet you do not have a bot flag. Upon review of the bot-like edits, I see a ton of structured edits from your account over the course of nearly a year. Are you operating a bot (external automated program that edits the wiki) through your user account? If so, please cease doing so immediately and contact WP:BAG for approval of a bot-flagged account to run your bot under. If not, how is it that you are making several edits/second for weeks at a time? -- EpochFail( talk| work) 18:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello Andrew, Welsh Dragon edit by STiki Earlier yesterday evening I noticed a Welsh Dragon edit by STiki. I investigated your article page – and this page ... liked your idea ... downloaded, and ... nothing! Where/how will it show up on my computer? ... how do I access STiki? What should I do next? Your assistance would be much appreciated. King regards, Gareth Griffith-Jones ( talk) 11:55, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
See stiki talk page.-- Deathlaser ( talk) 17:03, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I was thinking about the idea of a "meta" queue combining data from, say, the Cluebot-NG and STiki (metadata) queues. The most obvious form of such is to take the Cluebot-NG feed and check to see if its output also falls afoul of the STiki (metadata) detection system (using current thresholds or, if need be for getting some output if the two mechanisms should not intersect very much in their output, more relaxed ones). This idea is obvious enough that I'm sure you've thought of it. As a modification of it, I suggest having a fusion as follows:
The advantages of this are as follows (there may be others):
Your thoughts? Allens ( talk | contribs) 10:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
You mentioned in your post on my talk page that you are looking for collaborators, I would be happy to help! - Mcfar54
OK, well I feel that 100 is possibly a little low. I myself can amass 100 hundred edits on STiki in one sitting and in a short amount of time, if the vandalism rate is particularly high. Having not seen the stats for any STiki users, I propose something along the following lines:
These seem like much more satisfying levels with which to distribute an award, and it shows both trust and dedication when utilising the tool. The large difference between the edit-counts also makes an award seem more deserved and well-earned. 5,000 is a possibility, or we could have 10,000 as the next level up?
Finally, would we distribute standard Wikipedia barnstars found over at the barnstar page, or create stars that are more personal to STiki? Orphan Wiki ( talk) 11:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Andrew apart from {{ STiki topicon}} I have created 3 userboxes (see below). They automatically include users in the Category:Wikipedians who use STiki I have also tweaked the two existing Stiki userboxes [4] and [5] to include users of the 2 existing userbox into this category Please do have look, you can revert these edits if you dont agree with them, thanks and regards -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 22:09, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
User Box | Code |
---|---|
Goes to top right corner of the page (see) | {{ STiki topicon}} |
User:DBigXray/userbox/STiki 2 | {{User:DBigXray/userbox/STiki 2}} |
User:DBigXray/userbox/STiki | {{User:DBigXray/userbox/STiki}} |
User:DBigXray/STiki UserBox 3 | {{User:DBigXray/STiki UserBox 3}} |
Created a new one... if people are interested:
User Box | Code | |
---|---|---|
|
Yaris678 ( talk) 23:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Andrew,
It is good to see STiki growing in popularity. I am slightly concerned that the more popular it gets, the more difficult it will be for you to keep track of users who might be misusing STiki (either deliberately or through ignorance).
I guess this is similar to a problem they had in the earlyish days of Wikipedia, when they said "Jimbo doesn’t scale". One approach would be to insist on users having the Rollback right (as per T#005) but this has the potential to keep out good users. I guess another approach would be to give some trusted users access to your tools for checking that users aren’t abusing the system… However... I think I have a cleverer idea than either of these. I am hoping you will like it because it is taking a quantitative approach to the trust of STiki users.
I am essentially suggesting a peer-checking system. The more users you have the more beneficial this becomes. This idea is inspired by the user-based moderation system of Slashdot, but it is slightly different. The simplest way it could work is that when a user says that an edit is innocent, it is sometimes put back in the queue and fed to a different user (in the same way as if they had pressed "pass"). It can then be recorded whether the second user gave the same answer as the first. A slightly more advance version would have two new hidden queues, one for edits "innocented" by inexperienced editors to be sent to experienced editors and one edits "innocented" by experienced editors to be sent to inexperienced editors... and assume that the experienced editor is always right... unless they end up disagreeing with a lot of other users in which case there may be something weird going on. You could use this to quickly identify users who press either innocent of revert when they shouldn’t. You could make it so that the newest STiki users get a lot of edits referred on. You could also make it so that if you are identified as pressing innocent too much it increases the proportion of edits that are referred on... hopefully this will allow the system to collect enough evidence to show that it was a temporary blip and the rate can go back down... but if not the rate will go up until you reach the point where all "innocenting" by the user is rechecked.
If a user is identified as reverting too much then they need to be stopped from using STki relatively quickly. I guess some kind of intervention would be required at that point, to look at all their past edits and see what needs undoing.
An alternative/additional approach involves checking edits from the recent-changes API to see if they are reverts of STiki reverts. If one is, STiki could automatically add the new edit at the top of its queue... and then look to see what a different user makes of the edit. This wouldn’t check for over-use of the "innocent" button but it would have the advantage that if the edit was correctly identified as vandalism the first time around then it is good that it back at the top of the queue!
Yaris678 ( talk) 17:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Andrew, More thoughts on this:
Yaris678 ( talk) 12:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Andrew, I have updated Wikipedia:STiki#Directions_for_using_STiki Please check, Although I had not consulted you before updating the page, I felt it was needed for new users who want to understand how to use it, I was asked about it by a user so I thought of putting it here as well, what is your opinion ? . feel free to revert me anytime. -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 14:16, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Have you considered (for English and similar languages only, of course) using as features:
Vandalism using random keys tends to have a low proportion of vowels. Allens ( talk | contribs) 17:40, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey, is there any way to use STiki on Wikimedia Commons? If not, can you please make a version for that? Best, Dipankan says.. ( "Be bold and edit!") 15:09, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Sorted as in, if vandalism pops up, then users revert it the old fashioned way. That is for text. Click on undo manually. Also, I take back my comment. I just love the STiki interface. : ) -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 18:51, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Heya, just to let you know, Huggle, another Wiki anti vandal tool has been translated into Hindi. Can the same translations be used for STiki? I don't mind doing a little additional work. -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 18:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, have you ever thought of having a Flattr button on your website? -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 18:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks DBigXRay! Award moved to the "awards" section of the main WP:STiki page. Thanks! West.andrew.g ( talk) 20:52, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Significant changes were rolled out in this version, causing the version number to bump up 2.0 -> 2.1. Many of these were front-end modifications to the GUI. These feature requests were a little easier to accommodate than I had expected, meaning: (a) STiki has a nice organizational framework or (b) I've screwed up and I am about to be bombarded with bug reports. The major changes are as follows:
As always, thank you for your continued use of the STiki tool. Please report any bugs you encounters. Shortly STiki will past the 100,000 revert mark, and this should be a great milestone in the software's history! Thanks, West.andrew.g ( talk) 16:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I would quite like to help with stiki but I don't really know how I can. I could do some beta testing if needed. Cheers, Willdude123|Ƹ21ɘbublliW ( talk) 13:09, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
OK, so we're thinking about developing a welcome message for newer users of STiki and also a series of barnstars, recognising the attainment of a certain quantity of edits, the amounts of which we have discussed above. The first that I will help to address is the former. I thought it'd be best to begin a fresh thread, to make things easier to sift through in sections, and also to isolate certain points of interest and thus maximise focus and attention.
A welcome message will have to be built around a number of links to various pages within our STiki community. For a start, I think we should all think about which pages would be the best to include (as internal links) in the STiki welcome template here, before the scribing of the template commences. Obviously the pages of the most relevance and use to a newbie will be inserted. Thoughts? Orphan Wiki ( talk) 17:09, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
I saw in your block log that you once got blocked for running scripts without BAG approval. Did you get BAG approval? How? -- Tomtomn00 ( talk • contributions) 12:25, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |