Welcome to my page. Let me know how I can help. Wellspring 15:38, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Wellspring, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Jayjg
(talk)
21:29, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Sorry for the bad revert of Security through obscurity; glad you caught the missing stuff. -- Joebeone ( Talk) 02:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Here's a really neat discussion from a law professor about the trade off between "Security through obscurity" and the military's "loose lips sink ships" [1]... very neat discussion about when disclosure can increase security. This might be helpful in framing the article as it develops. -- Joebeone ( Talk) 17:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for marking that page for editing. I don't know how to edit, but I am learning fast. Samuel Johnson would be heart broken folks, let's get these kids literate. (Unsigned comment)
Hi Wellspring. The article as deleted was a two-sentence stub that said that Vortex was a restaurant in Little Five Point. That's insufficient for an article mainly because it made no attempt to indicate why such a thing should appear in an encyclopedia. I think probably the most applicable of the 'notability' policies would be WP:CORP. However, I suspect that Vortex is going fail the tests described there, and probably notability tests described elsewhere, too. I would suggest the best thing to do is add a few sentences to Little Five Points talking about it - I note that an image of the place is already there. That way, the information will be in its proper context and not have to pass the same kind of scrutiny that an individual article is likely to be subjected to. I hope that helps. Splash - tk 12:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Admittedly, I haven't read all of the stories that involve the Thrint; I was just trying to create an edit in which 'both sides can be right'. Kzanol had been in stasis roughly two bilion years and Suicide Night was roughly 1.5 billion years ago, which leave a roughly half-billion year period. So, I thought to myself: '500 million years is a long time; what if they evolved since? Then they could be small and large!' I was seeing if I could come up with an edit to explain the inconsistancy concerning size. HalfShadow 23:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
You wrote at
Talk:Rush_Limbaugh#Salon.com_article_about_Rush_Limbaugh.27s_refined_tastes_-_Is_it_too_trivial_.3F:
"Too trivial, the article appears to be an opinion column"
- Nice point. One of those things that's obvious when people mention it, but very few people do mention it. --
Writtenonsand (
talk)
12:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Please see [3] William M. Connolley ( talk) 19:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
I have changed to this version now:
[4], I hope that is ok? If we could agree on the
talkpage to something like that then we can refer new editors to continue discussion there before making any major changes.
Apis (
talk)
10:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Made some minor changes: [5] -- Apis ( talk) 11:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Regarding this [6]. I will ask you quietly if you yourself consider those comments civil. If you have specific gripes about my comments, then i suggest that you raise them on my talk page - or at an RfC. Address the article not the editors please. -- Kim D. Petersen ( talk) 19:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
article that i wrote. theres a lot of ethusiasm for the aritcle on the Rielle Hunter talkpage, so i suppose taht the problems that you noticedde wil be gone soon. 03:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Wellspring. I've been working, with my limited time, to construct a new article to replace Dogfight. It seems to be coming along OK ... slow, but OK. It may be long enough now to replace the old article, with possibly a tag that its still under construction. People seem to be getting a little antsy about having something in that space. I'm still kind of new to Wikipedia, not very computer saavy, and have no idea about the proper way to replace content in a situation like this. Plus, I would like to have someone else read it before any change is made. Much thanks for any help you can provide. The new article currently can be found at User:Zaereth/Dogfight. Zaereth ( talk) 19:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I've redirected Plasmodium (Slime Mold) to Plasmodium.-- Human.v2.0 ( talk) 14:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
De728631 ( talk) 19:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
The article Anonymously Yours has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DonaldD23
talk to me
23:41, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaper/Mechanist universe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaper/Mechanist universe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to my page. Let me know how I can help. Wellspring 15:38, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Wellspring, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Jayjg
(talk)
21:29, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Sorry for the bad revert of Security through obscurity; glad you caught the missing stuff. -- Joebeone ( Talk) 02:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Here's a really neat discussion from a law professor about the trade off between "Security through obscurity" and the military's "loose lips sink ships" [1]... very neat discussion about when disclosure can increase security. This might be helpful in framing the article as it develops. -- Joebeone ( Talk) 17:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for marking that page for editing. I don't know how to edit, but I am learning fast. Samuel Johnson would be heart broken folks, let's get these kids literate. (Unsigned comment)
Hi Wellspring. The article as deleted was a two-sentence stub that said that Vortex was a restaurant in Little Five Point. That's insufficient for an article mainly because it made no attempt to indicate why such a thing should appear in an encyclopedia. I think probably the most applicable of the 'notability' policies would be WP:CORP. However, I suspect that Vortex is going fail the tests described there, and probably notability tests described elsewhere, too. I would suggest the best thing to do is add a few sentences to Little Five Points talking about it - I note that an image of the place is already there. That way, the information will be in its proper context and not have to pass the same kind of scrutiny that an individual article is likely to be subjected to. I hope that helps. Splash - tk 12:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Admittedly, I haven't read all of the stories that involve the Thrint; I was just trying to create an edit in which 'both sides can be right'. Kzanol had been in stasis roughly two bilion years and Suicide Night was roughly 1.5 billion years ago, which leave a roughly half-billion year period. So, I thought to myself: '500 million years is a long time; what if they evolved since? Then they could be small and large!' I was seeing if I could come up with an edit to explain the inconsistancy concerning size. HalfShadow 23:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
You wrote at
Talk:Rush_Limbaugh#Salon.com_article_about_Rush_Limbaugh.27s_refined_tastes_-_Is_it_too_trivial_.3F:
"Too trivial, the article appears to be an opinion column"
- Nice point. One of those things that's obvious when people mention it, but very few people do mention it. --
Writtenonsand (
talk)
12:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Please see [3] William M. Connolley ( talk) 19:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
I have changed to this version now:
[4], I hope that is ok? If we could agree on the
talkpage to something like that then we can refer new editors to continue discussion there before making any major changes.
Apis (
talk)
10:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Made some minor changes: [5] -- Apis ( talk) 11:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Regarding this [6]. I will ask you quietly if you yourself consider those comments civil. If you have specific gripes about my comments, then i suggest that you raise them on my talk page - or at an RfC. Address the article not the editors please. -- Kim D. Petersen ( talk) 19:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
article that i wrote. theres a lot of ethusiasm for the aritcle on the Rielle Hunter talkpage, so i suppose taht the problems that you noticedde wil be gone soon. 03:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Wellspring. I've been working, with my limited time, to construct a new article to replace Dogfight. It seems to be coming along OK ... slow, but OK. It may be long enough now to replace the old article, with possibly a tag that its still under construction. People seem to be getting a little antsy about having something in that space. I'm still kind of new to Wikipedia, not very computer saavy, and have no idea about the proper way to replace content in a situation like this. Plus, I would like to have someone else read it before any change is made. Much thanks for any help you can provide. The new article currently can be found at User:Zaereth/Dogfight. Zaereth ( talk) 19:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I've redirected Plasmodium (Slime Mold) to Plasmodium.-- Human.v2.0 ( talk) 14:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
De728631 ( talk) 19:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
The article Anonymously Yours has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DonaldD23
talk to me
23:41, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaper/Mechanist universe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaper/Mechanist universe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)