So your solution to respond reported issues that violate wikipedia policies is to BLOCK and BAN the users? Is this how you think you are an admin? I am sorry but you are just a person that is given wrongful administrator credentials. You did not even investigate my request which is misuse of administrator privileges. You should first learn that being administrator comes with BIG responsibility. I only came here to report violation that I observed and you BANNED me saying that I don't have any edits? So what? I can't report people that violate your policies. Why do you think I am an editor and this is my "burner" account, it is not. I am a "READER" for years. What makes you think I am using a secondary account? I am just a reader and saw a heavy violation that violets Wikipedia policies. If this is not resolved, I am not going to create second account; I will seek my rights as a rightful civilian through Wikipedia corporate. Be aware that your actions that you have taken has no responsibility or research being involved. I hope you can stop thinking people are creating secondary accounts just to report issues. I never HAD an account on wikipedia and you can't BAN or BLOCK someone just because they created account to report issues. After I reported the user and administrator "Sandstein" blocked me, I received following SYN FLOOD DDOS attempts that are sourced from NETHERLANDS. I hope AN ADMINISTRATOR knows SHARING or MISUSING of IP address under GDPR is ILLEGAL ACTIVITY. Therefore, I hope you are not behind this attack because I don't think you can be in that level of stupidity, but anyway it will be found from the source (billing) of these attacks. I am just putting it here as evidence which will be used later with Wikipedia corporation. Below attacks are received to my network from below SOURCE IPs; [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 185.30.166.34,port 52515 Monday, May 03,2021 22:39:30 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 185.30.166.34,port 41521 Monday, May 03,2021 22:39:30 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 185.30.166.34,port 44205 Monday, May 03,2021 22:39:30 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 185.30.166.34,port 54583 Monday, May 03,2021 22:39:30 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 185.30.166.34,port 56983 Monday, May 03,2021 22:39:30 Now, convince me you are not behind this attacks? Just like I could not convince you that I am not a "burner" account, I hope you will understand what actions you have taken.



Response to stwalkerstar: For you to decline this request; I must have made "edits" or "damaged" wikipedia; instead I came here to report violation of Wikipedia policies; therefore you are contradicting with yourself by blaming me to cause damage or disruption. As I said I am a long term wikipedia "reader" not editor. Your administrator "sandstein" violated responsibilities of his/her privilege by banning me without researching the request. I also got DDOS attempts from above IP address which is located in Netherlands right after that. Please check where Sandstein resides, please check where his IP is "geo located" at. I am already reaching to authorities about this DDOS request. As a summary; I did not cause damage, I did not even edit a page. You can try to put things to support your claim; but they will only make you feel good; you are not doing anything right by opposing/contradicting yourself. READ WHAT I EXPLAINED ABOVE BEFORE POSTING THAT RESPONSE.

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. stwalkerster ( talk) 08:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Response to stwalkerstar: For you to decline this request; I must have made "edits" or "damaged" wikipedia; instead I came here to report violation of Wikipedia policies; therefore you are contradicting with yourself by blaming me to cause damage or disruption. As I said I am a long term wikipedia "reader" not editor. Your administrator "sandstein" violated responsibilities of his/her privilege by banning me without researching the request. I also got DDOS attempts from above IP address which is located in Netherlands right after that. Please check where Sandstein resides, please check where his IP is "geo located" at. I am already reaching to authorities about this DDOS request. As a summary; I did not cause damage, I did not even edit a page. You can try to put things to support your claim; but they will only make you feel good; you are not doing anything right by opposing/contradicting yourself. READ WHAT I EXPLAINED ABOVE BEFORE POSTING THAT RESPONSE.

Not an unblock request. If you use unblock requests to argue with others, your access to this page will be removed. 331dot ( talk) 22:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply