Some of your edits are clearly helpful, and you've reverted a fair amount of obvious vandalism, which I thank you for.
However, you have also made a number of edits which appear to be significantly outside Wikipedia's purpose of existence, and a number of edits in which your communications contained ungrammatical and unintelligible writing. It's not entirely clear that you are actually understanding and communicating in response to people complaining about your outside policy edits on article talk pages, your talk page, or the discussion on the Administrators' Noticeboard for Incidents.
I have placed an indefinite block on your editing Wikipedia, other than here on your talk page. This is not a permanent block. Any administrator, including myself, can unblock you immediately if you can clearly communicate that you understand that you need to discuss your edit problems with other editors in a focused and understandable manner.
If you can explain why your edits have been hard to understand, that would help in the matter.
Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert ( talk) 21:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Copy of your message to Georgewilliamherbert: Wikipedia e-mail
InboxX
Reply |Wdl1961 show details 7:28 PM (1 hour ago)
if there is a specific item i edited in an article that is wrong i would like to know about it. i suppose a blown battery blinding a person is not important to some .
1961delang@gmail.com
In wikpedia
hydropower is the derivation and formula for power as follows:
this formula applies to the pump and turbine . Because the flow is the same in both it results in v^5 . This to me is a focused and detailed derivation . There are no fluid couplings with a variable diameter after they are designed and build. If you have a focused and particular question other than water is not oil I will try to answer it. Wdl1961 ( talk) 00:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Wdl1961 ( talk · contribs) has been edit warring, violating 3RR, by adding how-to instructions in Jump start (vehicle). User has refused meaningful discussion on talk page, and has shown no regard for WP policy, i.e. WP:NOTHOWTO. Edits: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] -- Dbratland ( talk) 01:51, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Editors should be required to read art. first and apply rules evenly. Wdl1961 ( talk) 02:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
for easy ref "Relational Vibration "
copy from Talk:Four-stroke engine
13 User:Wdl1961
14 file
14.1 Relational Vibration
Wdl1961 ( talk) 13:47, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Wdl1961 ( talk) 20:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry, that sounds just like plain craziness. A certain soundness of mind is required to edit Wikipedia, and it does not seem to be present here. I was about to indefinitely block Wdl1961 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) at this point, but Georgewilliamherbert was faster than me. Sandstein 20:58, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be – or to be indistinguishable from – self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time
— Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
notice the slack in the chain to ignore small speed disturbances.
Some of your edits are clearly helpful, and you've reverted a fair amount of obvious vandalism, which I thank you for.
However, you have also made a number of edits which appear to be significantly outside Wikipedia's purpose of existence, and a number of edits in which your communications contained ungrammatical and unintelligible writing. It's not entirely clear that you are actually understanding and communicating in response to people complaining about your outside policy edits on article talk pages, your talk page, or the discussion on the Administrators' Noticeboard for Incidents.
I have placed an indefinite block on your editing Wikipedia, other than here on your talk page. This is not a permanent block. Any administrator, including myself, can unblock you immediately if you can clearly communicate that you understand that you need to discuss your edit problems with other editors in a focused and understandable manner.
If you can explain why your edits have been hard to understand, that would help in the matter.
Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert ( talk) 21:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Copy of your message to Georgewilliamherbert: Wikipedia e-mail
InboxX
Reply |Wdl1961 show details 7:28 PM (1 hour ago)
if there is a specific item i edited in an article that is wrong i would like to know about it. i suppose a blown battery blinding a person is not important to some .
1961delang@gmail.com
In wikpedia
hydropower is the derivation and formula for power as follows:
this formula applies to the pump and turbine . Because the flow is the same in both it results in v^5 . This to me is a focused and detailed derivation . There are no fluid couplings with a variable diameter after they are designed and build. If you have a focused and particular question other than water is not oil I will try to answer it. Wdl1961 ( talk) 00:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Wdl1961 ( talk · contribs) has been edit warring, violating 3RR, by adding how-to instructions in Jump start (vehicle). User has refused meaningful discussion on talk page, and has shown no regard for WP policy, i.e. WP:NOTHOWTO. Edits: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] -- Dbratland ( talk) 01:51, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Editors should be required to read art. first and apply rules evenly. Wdl1961 ( talk) 02:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
for easy ref "Relational Vibration "
copy from Talk:Four-stroke engine
13 User:Wdl1961
14 file
14.1 Relational Vibration
Wdl1961 ( talk) 13:47, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Wdl1961 ( talk) 20:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry, that sounds just like plain craziness. A certain soundness of mind is required to edit Wikipedia, and it does not seem to be present here. I was about to indefinitely block Wdl1961 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) at this point, but Georgewilliamherbert was faster than me. Sandstein 20:58, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be – or to be indistinguishable from – self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time
— Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
notice the slack in the chain to ignore small speed disturbances.