Curious why someone keeps pulling the link to the original documentary about the williamsburg oil spill. please comment or quit it. this is a relevent link to a news piece that is specific to this topic.
Copyright status of Williamsburg oil spill
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to
Williamsburg oil spill. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (
http://gowanuslounge.blogspot.com/2007/04/from-where-might-roebling-oil-have-come.html in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the
GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Williamsburg oil spill with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Williamsburg oil spill with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Williamsburg oil spill saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.
It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ohconfucius 08:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has been deleted following the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Williamsburg oil spill. Do not recreate the article. If you continue to repost deleted content you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
If you think this article has a place on Wikipedia, I suggest that you show that the event is of national or international significance. The reason this article was deleted is because it is a local news story of limited importance beyond its locality. If you believe I closed the Articles for deletion discussion incorrectly, you may list it at deletion review. --Akhilleus ( talk) 02:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Curious why someone keeps pulling the link to the original documentary about the williamsburg oil spill. please comment or quit it. this is a relevent link to a news piece that is specific to this topic.
Copyright status of Williamsburg oil spill
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to
Williamsburg oil spill. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (
http://gowanuslounge.blogspot.com/2007/04/from-where-might-roebling-oil-have-come.html in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the
GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Williamsburg oil spill with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Williamsburg oil spill with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Williamsburg oil spill saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.
It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ohconfucius 08:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has been deleted following the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Williamsburg oil spill. Do not recreate the article. If you continue to repost deleted content you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
If you think this article has a place on Wikipedia, I suggest that you show that the event is of national or international significance. The reason this article was deleted is because it is a local news story of limited importance beyond its locality. If you believe I closed the Articles for deletion discussion incorrectly, you may list it at deletion review. --Akhilleus ( talk) 02:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC)