Please source changes you make, such as the one you did at Belgian Navy Garuda28 ( talk) 15:57, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
You can't source anything wich doesn't have a source, so the same aplies to the "marine component" which is incorrect.
the only name sourced by the belgian navy itself is the belgian navy and i have read the naval component once, so joining the dutch name marinecomponent as marine component of the belgian armed forces makes zero sense. Waterstofgas ( talk) 20:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The english use of Marine Component is sourced nor cited, so your argument is invalid, 21:00, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Dutch is a different language as English so it is an invalid source Waterstofgas ( talk) 21:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
the sourcetext itself is in english, however, it also says it names in french Composante Maritime and dutch Marine component so again a invalid source
navy=english Composante Miritime=French Marine Component=Dutch, and i am not against using the name however i am against using the name as being the english name, so if it was used as the dutch name it would be fine, however is is placed as marine Compenent{which is dutch} of the belgian armed Forces{English obviously} and that is plain wrong Waterstofgas ( talk) 21:30, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Waterstofgas ( talk) 21:30, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HNLMS Rotterdam (L800), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Browning ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Please source changes you make, such as the one you did at Belgian Navy Garuda28 ( talk) 15:57, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
You can't source anything wich doesn't have a source, so the same aplies to the "marine component" which is incorrect.
the only name sourced by the belgian navy itself is the belgian navy and i have read the naval component once, so joining the dutch name marinecomponent as marine component of the belgian armed forces makes zero sense. Waterstofgas ( talk) 20:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The english use of Marine Component is sourced nor cited, so your argument is invalid, 21:00, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Dutch is a different language as English so it is an invalid source Waterstofgas ( talk) 21:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
the sourcetext itself is in english, however, it also says it names in french Composante Maritime and dutch Marine component so again a invalid source
navy=english Composante Miritime=French Marine Component=Dutch, and i am not against using the name however i am against using the name as being the english name, so if it was used as the dutch name it would be fine, however is is placed as marine Compenent{which is dutch} of the belgian armed Forces{English obviously} and that is plain wrong Waterstofgas ( talk) 21:30, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Waterstofgas ( talk) 21:30, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HNLMS Rotterdam (L800), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Browning ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 7 April 2018 (UTC)