Volume 5, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter | ||
This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed. | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Can you look through Special:Contributions/184.13.156.251 and see what needs reversion? This IP was inserting blatantly false information into the articles for I-68 and a handful of others, so I suspect that his edits in the Carolinas may be more of the same. Imzadi 1979 → 01:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Where are you getting the information about what you are changing?— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Well, there were things fixed. I didn't see it, but you did fix the one problem I told you about in addiiton to everything else. As long as one of the references is good, Imzadi won't have anything to complain about. — Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Do you think it's a good idea to merge Interstate 274 into Winston-Salem Northern Beltway until the designation is finalized? – Fredddie ™ 23:23, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot ( talk) 05:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
i am not sure why you have chosen to edit war on this page. your comment "I can play this all day, Revert back" is not helpful and can be seen in a very negative light. please discuss it on the talk page of the article. i have put a comment there - basically, there is no proof at all that it is called blue star highway. both links you provide show exactly what i am saying, and nothing to what you are saying. if there are good links for it, then please provide it. thank you. Soosim ( talk) 06:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
It appears that South Carolina does have primary routes; take a look at http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t57c005.php: the word "primary" is all over the place. Now it might not be the same as just the blue-and-white-shield-signed routes, since U.S. routes are not mentioned, but those state numbered routes are obviously not secondary and they're not Interstates, either, so it has to be that they're primary. True, no one's going to say "Take S.C. primary 73", but no one's going to say "Take trunkline M-46", either, yet Michigan DOT calls the routes in its state system "trunkline". My suggestion is to revert, adding a note on how John Q. Public notes the route designations (e.g. "South Carolina primary routes, usually identified by the public as 'State Highway xx',...."). Mapsax ( talk) 13:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Great to have you in the channel today! Have a good trip, and hope to see you soon. -- Rs chen 7754 02:22, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
See this discussion on the excessive number of categories along various US Routes. --------- User:DanTD ( talk) 19:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Volume 5, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter | ||
This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed. | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Can you look through Special:Contributions/184.13.156.251 and see what needs reversion? This IP was inserting blatantly false information into the articles for I-68 and a handful of others, so I suspect that his edits in the Carolinas may be more of the same. Imzadi 1979 → 01:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Where are you getting the information about what you are changing?— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Well, there were things fixed. I didn't see it, but you did fix the one problem I told you about in addiiton to everything else. As long as one of the references is good, Imzadi won't have anything to complain about. — Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Do you think it's a good idea to merge Interstate 274 into Winston-Salem Northern Beltway until the designation is finalized? – Fredddie ™ 23:23, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot ( talk) 05:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
i am not sure why you have chosen to edit war on this page. your comment "I can play this all day, Revert back" is not helpful and can be seen in a very negative light. please discuss it on the talk page of the article. i have put a comment there - basically, there is no proof at all that it is called blue star highway. both links you provide show exactly what i am saying, and nothing to what you are saying. if there are good links for it, then please provide it. thank you. Soosim ( talk) 06:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
It appears that South Carolina does have primary routes; take a look at http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t57c005.php: the word "primary" is all over the place. Now it might not be the same as just the blue-and-white-shield-signed routes, since U.S. routes are not mentioned, but those state numbered routes are obviously not secondary and they're not Interstates, either, so it has to be that they're primary. True, no one's going to say "Take S.C. primary 73", but no one's going to say "Take trunkline M-46", either, yet Michigan DOT calls the routes in its state system "trunkline". My suggestion is to revert, adding a note on how John Q. Public notes the route designations (e.g. "South Carolina primary routes, usually identified by the public as 'State Highway xx',...."). Mapsax ( talk) 13:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Great to have you in the channel today! Have a good trip, and hope to see you soon. -- Rs chen 7754 02:22, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
See this discussion on the excessive number of categories along various US Routes. --------- User:DanTD ( talk) 19:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)