![]() |
Women in Red Women in Africa contest |
Warofdreams Thank you for your additions January 2021 WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 01:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC) |
Hi.
I recently contributed to the infobox template list of UK regional daily newspapers, where I added the Nuneaton Telegraph, but I was quick to see it removed from the list as you called it a 'weekly newspaper', however it is in fact a daily newspaper - albeit without its own page at this moment in time.
Nuneaton's weekly newspaper is actually the Nuneaton News which is only printed and sold on Wednesdays. This is proven on the publisher ( Reach plc)'s website just here.
I am currently creating a list of local written media for both Nuneaton and Hinckley, but I have not got around to making it its own dedicated page yet.
A quick look at the PressReader website for the paper, linked here will indeed show the publication is daily (excluding Sundays).
I have no objection to it being re-added once it has its own Wikipedia entry if that works for you.
Kind regards, Pokkeballs17 ( talk) 13:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() | |
Eight years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, in this edit you added a category Category:Trade unions based in West Yorkshire but I can find no information in article of a West Yorkshire connection. The only location mentioned is Cumberworth in Lincolnshire. Can you shed any light on this? Keith D ( talk) 22:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
♀. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 10#♀ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Elli (
talk |
contribs)
09:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi! Recently I came across a request for an article (or articles) on the expeditions of the Third Reich. I intended to create a German Antarctic Expedition (1938–1939) article. After reading your rather copious paragraph about it in your article New Swabia I wonder if this is really necessary. Would you agree, that I simply create one article for all (three relevant) Third Reich expeditions? All the best Wikirictor talk • contribs 19:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English People's Liberation Army until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
— Kusma ( t· c) 20:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Women in Red Women in Africa contest |
Warofdreams Thank you for your additions March 2021! - WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 00:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC) |
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Green Voice (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
doktorb words deeds 08:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Raving Loony Green Giant Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. doktorb words deeds 04:35, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raving Loony Green Giant Party (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
doktorb words deeds 17:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you. Mohamed Taqi ( talk) 13:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC) |
I have nominated Fourth International for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ( t · c) buidhe 03:42, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Women in Red Women in Europe contest |
Warofdreams Thank you for your additions May 2021 WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 00:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC) |
Hi there, Warofdreams, and thanks for participating in the contest. You might be interested in covering one or more of the centenarians in Peaceray's detailed redlist. We have decided to target them for the remainder of the contest as all but one are from Europe. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 12:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Women in Red Women in Europe contest |
Warofdreams Thank you for your additions June 2021 WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 00:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC) |
Hello, hope all is well. Are you able to comment at an open BN thread? – xeno talk 02:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for earlier joining the Organized Labour project. I've been a participant in the project since 2006 and am helping with a revival of it. As part this we are introducing a new membership system, which will help with communications among participants. This involves creating a membership file for each participant within your user space (you can see an example of my membership card here: User:Goldsztajn/WikiProjectCards/WikiProject Organized Labour). This system is already in operation within a number of wikiprojects (such as Women in Red and Medicine). You will not have to do anything, myself or someone else from the project will create the relevant file within your userspace. However, I am conscious that it is impolite to change an editor's userspace without notice. If I don't hear from you in the negative, I will go ahead with making the change in the next two weeks. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Many thanks for supporting the project, in solidarity,-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 23:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Solidarity forever |
I'm scared to see what will happen should you organize n a wiki strike ;) Your dozen articles on trade union related topics this week are extensive and I enjoyed reading and reviewing them! Please let the others at WP:LABOR know about your great work! Shushugah (he/him • talk) 01:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Adoptive parent. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 14#Adoptive parent until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Laterthanyouthink (
talk)
05:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
I have quite a wry smile on my face at the moment, having just discovered you created this article back in 2005. I wonder, were you aware of the role of a certain Ukrainian wrestling fan and the yahoo group Leftist Trainspotters in that saga? Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk) 13:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Wondering if you have any insight as to whether 1–3 Minster Court were previously the same numbers on Minster Yard at some point. I'm not seeing any evidence of 1–3 Minster Yard in my Google searches. It just seems weird that the numbers of Minster Yard seem to begin at 4. British History has been helpful up till now, but isn't clarifying this issue, if there even is one. To muddy the waters even more, the Minster website lists Treasurer's House as being 2 Minster Yard. - Seasider53 ( talk) 00:37, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
It's a great question, and harder to answer than I expected. In the 1850s, the street still didn't have an official name, though it was generally referred to as Minster Yard. There's no evidence the buildings were numbered at the time, either. By the start of the 20th-century, the buildings had been numbered, and Minster Court was a separate street. But I can't find any evidence of the order of these two events. It seems logical that the numbering happened first, but e.g. at Blossom Street, the numbering continues into The Mount despite the change in name. Warofdreams talk 09:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Party name with colour has been
nominated for merging with
Template:Party name with color. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Gonnym (
talk)
09:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
A token of thanks
Hi Warofdreams! I've
nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk ~~~~~
|
![]() |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Women in Red Women in Africa contest |
Warofdreams Thank you for your additions January 2021 WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 01:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC) |
Hi.
I recently contributed to the infobox template list of UK regional daily newspapers, where I added the Nuneaton Telegraph, but I was quick to see it removed from the list as you called it a 'weekly newspaper', however it is in fact a daily newspaper - albeit without its own page at this moment in time.
Nuneaton's weekly newspaper is actually the Nuneaton News which is only printed and sold on Wednesdays. This is proven on the publisher ( Reach plc)'s website just here.
I am currently creating a list of local written media for both Nuneaton and Hinckley, but I have not got around to making it its own dedicated page yet.
A quick look at the PressReader website for the paper, linked here will indeed show the publication is daily (excluding Sundays).
I have no objection to it being re-added once it has its own Wikipedia entry if that works for you.
Kind regards, Pokkeballs17 ( talk) 13:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() | |
Eight years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, in this edit you added a category Category:Trade unions based in West Yorkshire but I can find no information in article of a West Yorkshire connection. The only location mentioned is Cumberworth in Lincolnshire. Can you shed any light on this? Keith D ( talk) 22:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
♀. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 10#♀ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Elli (
talk |
contribs)
09:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi! Recently I came across a request for an article (or articles) on the expeditions of the Third Reich. I intended to create a German Antarctic Expedition (1938–1939) article. After reading your rather copious paragraph about it in your article New Swabia I wonder if this is really necessary. Would you agree, that I simply create one article for all (three relevant) Third Reich expeditions? All the best Wikirictor talk • contribs 19:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English People's Liberation Army until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
— Kusma ( t· c) 20:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Women in Red Women in Africa contest |
Warofdreams Thank you for your additions March 2021! - WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 00:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC) |
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Green Voice (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
doktorb words deeds 08:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Raving Loony Green Giant Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. doktorb words deeds 04:35, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raving Loony Green Giant Party (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
doktorb words deeds 17:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you. Mohamed Taqi ( talk) 13:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC) |
I have nominated Fourth International for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ( t · c) buidhe 03:42, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Women in Red Women in Europe contest |
Warofdreams Thank you for your additions May 2021 WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 00:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC) |
Hi there, Warofdreams, and thanks for participating in the contest. You might be interested in covering one or more of the centenarians in Peaceray's detailed redlist. We have decided to target them for the remainder of the contest as all but one are from Europe. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 12:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Women in Red Women in Europe contest |
Warofdreams Thank you for your additions June 2021 WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 00:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC) |
Hello, hope all is well. Are you able to comment at an open BN thread? – xeno talk 02:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for earlier joining the Organized Labour project. I've been a participant in the project since 2006 and am helping with a revival of it. As part this we are introducing a new membership system, which will help with communications among participants. This involves creating a membership file for each participant within your user space (you can see an example of my membership card here: User:Goldsztajn/WikiProjectCards/WikiProject Organized Labour). This system is already in operation within a number of wikiprojects (such as Women in Red and Medicine). You will not have to do anything, myself or someone else from the project will create the relevant file within your userspace. However, I am conscious that it is impolite to change an editor's userspace without notice. If I don't hear from you in the negative, I will go ahead with making the change in the next two weeks. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Many thanks for supporting the project, in solidarity,-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 23:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Solidarity forever |
I'm scared to see what will happen should you organize n a wiki strike ;) Your dozen articles on trade union related topics this week are extensive and I enjoyed reading and reviewing them! Please let the others at WP:LABOR know about your great work! Shushugah (he/him • talk) 01:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Adoptive parent. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 14#Adoptive parent until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Laterthanyouthink (
talk)
05:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
I have quite a wry smile on my face at the moment, having just discovered you created this article back in 2005. I wonder, were you aware of the role of a certain Ukrainian wrestling fan and the yahoo group Leftist Trainspotters in that saga? Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk) 13:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Wondering if you have any insight as to whether 1–3 Minster Court were previously the same numbers on Minster Yard at some point. I'm not seeing any evidence of 1–3 Minster Yard in my Google searches. It just seems weird that the numbers of Minster Yard seem to begin at 4. British History has been helpful up till now, but isn't clarifying this issue, if there even is one. To muddy the waters even more, the Minster website lists Treasurer's House as being 2 Minster Yard. - Seasider53 ( talk) 00:37, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
It's a great question, and harder to answer than I expected. In the 1850s, the street still didn't have an official name, though it was generally referred to as Minster Yard. There's no evidence the buildings were numbered at the time, either. By the start of the 20th-century, the buildings had been numbered, and Minster Court was a separate street. But I can't find any evidence of the order of these two events. It seems logical that the numbering happened first, but e.g. at Blossom Street, the numbering continues into The Mount despite the change in name. Warofdreams talk 09:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Party name with colour has been
nominated for merging with
Template:Party name with color. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Gonnym (
talk)
09:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
A token of thanks
Hi Warofdreams! I've
nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk ~~~~~
|
![]() |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)