|
You're a quick guy, huh? Give people a second to add sources before throwing in your templates. Nataev ( talk)
Have you really nothing better to do with your time than nominate things for deletion? Grow up! Alinblack ( talk) 00:31, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello WarlordFrederick. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sky Of Fury, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to albums. Thank you. JohnCD ( talk) 12:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
I need help for describe my solution. Is this you'r help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.101.240.176 ( talk) 17:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
You need to give your solution to an actual mathematician first. The Millennium Prize is given by the Clay Mathematics Institute, so you should probably go there. If the mathematics community determines your solution to be correct, you can receive the prize and THEN you can mark the problem as "solved". WarlordFrederick ( talk) 19:35, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
1 In patrolling the article on Edward Shao, you marked it as unreferenced. Considering that it was a single sentence article on an asserted 1996 Olympics pole-vaulter, you might have realised that such athletes always are very easy to source if real; this one cannot be identified , and is an undoubted hoax & will be deleted as such.
2. Faye Sultan is real enough. But you've overtagged it. It is not confusing, it is not a personal reflection or essay, it was not written from a fan's POV, It's just a sloppily written article that needs additional references.
3 In patrolling Nutripathogen, you tagged it for a number of faults; but considering the term can not be found elsewhere on the web, and is stated on the page as a neologism, you should have nominated for for deletion. No speedy category really fits, so I've prodded it.
4. Patrick whitton, at the very least needed a page move to "Patrick Whitton" But since it is an unsourcedbio of a living person, it must be immediately sourced or given a BLP Prod. I think it may in fact be a hoax, because it would be easy to source, if he played on the three first-rate teams mentioned, but I cannot find him.
5, I would not have said that MagLev (software) just needs additional citations. There is no reason to think it notable. Since there is no speedy category for software, it too should be prodded. or at least marked for notability.
I think you need considerably more experience before you patrol pages, and for the present, you must stop. It is better to have articles unpatrolled than patrolled incorrectly--because if unpatrolled, someone else will surely patrol them, but if you miss major problems during patrolling, they may never be identified and dealt with. tThe best way to get it is to write some articles yourself. After that, read carefully and in detail WP:Deletion Policy and the many related pages on our requirements for articles. DGG ( talk ) 05:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice. WarlordFrederick ( talk) 05:41, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scarborough Fair (ballad), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Energie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, FrederickE. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, FrederickE. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, FrederickE. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
|
You're a quick guy, huh? Give people a second to add sources before throwing in your templates. Nataev ( talk)
Have you really nothing better to do with your time than nominate things for deletion? Grow up! Alinblack ( talk) 00:31, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello WarlordFrederick. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sky Of Fury, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to albums. Thank you. JohnCD ( talk) 12:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
I need help for describe my solution. Is this you'r help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.101.240.176 ( talk) 17:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
You need to give your solution to an actual mathematician first. The Millennium Prize is given by the Clay Mathematics Institute, so you should probably go there. If the mathematics community determines your solution to be correct, you can receive the prize and THEN you can mark the problem as "solved". WarlordFrederick ( talk) 19:35, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
1 In patrolling the article on Edward Shao, you marked it as unreferenced. Considering that it was a single sentence article on an asserted 1996 Olympics pole-vaulter, you might have realised that such athletes always are very easy to source if real; this one cannot be identified , and is an undoubted hoax & will be deleted as such.
2. Faye Sultan is real enough. But you've overtagged it. It is not confusing, it is not a personal reflection or essay, it was not written from a fan's POV, It's just a sloppily written article that needs additional references.
3 In patrolling Nutripathogen, you tagged it for a number of faults; but considering the term can not be found elsewhere on the web, and is stated on the page as a neologism, you should have nominated for for deletion. No speedy category really fits, so I've prodded it.
4. Patrick whitton, at the very least needed a page move to "Patrick Whitton" But since it is an unsourcedbio of a living person, it must be immediately sourced or given a BLP Prod. I think it may in fact be a hoax, because it would be easy to source, if he played on the three first-rate teams mentioned, but I cannot find him.
5, I would not have said that MagLev (software) just needs additional citations. There is no reason to think it notable. Since there is no speedy category for software, it too should be prodded. or at least marked for notability.
I think you need considerably more experience before you patrol pages, and for the present, you must stop. It is better to have articles unpatrolled than patrolled incorrectly--because if unpatrolled, someone else will surely patrol them, but if you miss major problems during patrolling, they may never be identified and dealt with. tThe best way to get it is to write some articles yourself. After that, read carefully and in detail WP:Deletion Policy and the many related pages on our requirements for articles. DGG ( talk ) 05:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice. WarlordFrederick ( talk) 05:41, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scarborough Fair (ballad), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Energie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, FrederickE. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, FrederickE. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, FrederickE. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)