Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on
legal threats and
civility. Users who make such threats may be
blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for
dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by
reliable independent sources and focusing especially on
verifiable errors of fact. Thank you.
Salvio
Let's talk about it!
09:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Why can't I edit Wikipedia?
Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
{{
unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}
on
your user talk page.-- Orange Mike | Talk 14:45, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Walteriarecords ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
No reason given, but per below this is declined per WP:NLT. — Daniel Case ( talk) 17:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It seems the facts that I can present won't be allowed to be presented here which does not make the article accurate.
the picture submitted I did not submit and is not owned by Dan DeWald who actually took the picture from another website that he has no access to either. He has done this once before and created fake pages and profiles.
Slander is a ground for a lawsuit and I have a right to equal rebuttal (fairness doctrine) not given here. Blocking me denies my rights under the fairness doctrine. I only asked for the changes I made to stand to remove the slander done to me here and you guys allowed it to continue the process for protection is way too complicated for someone to understand.
The last edit I had done should stand as it is the most accurate of article in question and if that can't be done with the picture removed then yes I have no choice but to sue for copyright infringement if need be this is not a threat. The article was not used for publicity purposes but to note the actual achievement of having the most #1 hits on a weekly published chart which has been verified by America's Got Talent period! Not the words "Self proclaimed" this is where the slander note here is by wikipedia not by me here. I am the victim of the vandalism here not wikipedia. I only asked to be allowed to fix this false statement without penalty.
Walteriarecords ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
You need to unblock me as I have the actual facts that the last editor does not! The last editor is slandering me here and has some facts in error in which under my first amendment right to free speech, I have that right to correct and if necessary if I am not allowed to correct them I will take legal action if I am not unblocked. I didnt write the article and I have the right to have the facts presented properly!
Decline reason:
The first amendment doesn't apply on Wikipedia, and making threats of legal action is a definite ground for blocking anyway. Otherwise, I would have suggested an application for unblocking to change your username. Peridon ( talk) 15:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Perhaps a few words of clarification may help.
We are not trying to bully you, here. If you believe you have been wronged, please retract the legal threat and calmly explain why you feel defamed and how you'd like to have the article edited or, alternatively, contact WP:OTRS; you can do that, following the instructions listed here. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:47, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Since when do you have the right to delete a historic celebrity page in which having the subject in question is very important in the Folk Music world and you delete it because you don’t like it??? I don’t think you understand Folk Music in the States and therefore you shall have no right to delete American pages when you know nothing about the subject. The subject in question also appeared in the American Version of Britian’s Got Talent called “America’s Got Talent!” They verified the facts that you refuse to accept and therefore took it upon yourself to delete the page.
Unless you wish to get sued you need to reinstate the page, issue an apology to me and inform the editors to protect the page and allow The subject to defend himself with the rightful edits. You may have freedom of the press but we also have the right to right the wrongs either by words or by force if necessary to get this page restored accordingly! — Walteriarecords ( talk · contribs) [via e-mail to RHaworth]
Given your comment above of "we also have the right to right the wrongs either by words or by force"... your repeated threats of legal action are expressly prohibited, and threats of violence (whether specifically targeted against the editor to whom you sent the e-mail above or not) will not be tolerated. I have revoked access to your talk page to prevent any further inappropriate logorrhea on your part. If you wish to communicate further regarding any issue you might have, please contact ArbCom directly. -- Kinu t/ c 19:44, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on
legal threats and
civility. Users who make such threats may be
blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for
dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by
reliable independent sources and focusing especially on
verifiable errors of fact. Thank you.
Salvio
Let's talk about it!
09:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Why can't I edit Wikipedia?
Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
{{
unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}
on
your user talk page.-- Orange Mike | Talk 14:45, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Walteriarecords ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
No reason given, but per below this is declined per WP:NLT. — Daniel Case ( talk) 17:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It seems the facts that I can present won't be allowed to be presented here which does not make the article accurate.
the picture submitted I did not submit and is not owned by Dan DeWald who actually took the picture from another website that he has no access to either. He has done this once before and created fake pages and profiles.
Slander is a ground for a lawsuit and I have a right to equal rebuttal (fairness doctrine) not given here. Blocking me denies my rights under the fairness doctrine. I only asked for the changes I made to stand to remove the slander done to me here and you guys allowed it to continue the process for protection is way too complicated for someone to understand.
The last edit I had done should stand as it is the most accurate of article in question and if that can't be done with the picture removed then yes I have no choice but to sue for copyright infringement if need be this is not a threat. The article was not used for publicity purposes but to note the actual achievement of having the most #1 hits on a weekly published chart which has been verified by America's Got Talent period! Not the words "Self proclaimed" this is where the slander note here is by wikipedia not by me here. I am the victim of the vandalism here not wikipedia. I only asked to be allowed to fix this false statement without penalty.
Walteriarecords ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
You need to unblock me as I have the actual facts that the last editor does not! The last editor is slandering me here and has some facts in error in which under my first amendment right to free speech, I have that right to correct and if necessary if I am not allowed to correct them I will take legal action if I am not unblocked. I didnt write the article and I have the right to have the facts presented properly!
Decline reason:
The first amendment doesn't apply on Wikipedia, and making threats of legal action is a definite ground for blocking anyway. Otherwise, I would have suggested an application for unblocking to change your username. Peridon ( talk) 15:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Perhaps a few words of clarification may help.
We are not trying to bully you, here. If you believe you have been wronged, please retract the legal threat and calmly explain why you feel defamed and how you'd like to have the article edited or, alternatively, contact WP:OTRS; you can do that, following the instructions listed here. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:47, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Since when do you have the right to delete a historic celebrity page in which having the subject in question is very important in the Folk Music world and you delete it because you don’t like it??? I don’t think you understand Folk Music in the States and therefore you shall have no right to delete American pages when you know nothing about the subject. The subject in question also appeared in the American Version of Britian’s Got Talent called “America’s Got Talent!” They verified the facts that you refuse to accept and therefore took it upon yourself to delete the page.
Unless you wish to get sued you need to reinstate the page, issue an apology to me and inform the editors to protect the page and allow The subject to defend himself with the rightful edits. You may have freedom of the press but we also have the right to right the wrongs either by words or by force if necessary to get this page restored accordingly! — Walteriarecords ( talk · contribs) [via e-mail to RHaworth]
Given your comment above of "we also have the right to right the wrongs either by words or by force"... your repeated threats of legal action are expressly prohibited, and threats of violence (whether specifically targeted against the editor to whom you sent the e-mail above or not) will not be tolerated. I have revoked access to your talk page to prevent any further inappropriate logorrhea on your part. If you wish to communicate further regarding any issue you might have, please contact ArbCom directly. -- Kinu t/ c 19:44, 16 June 2011 (UTC)