Hi,
I tried to add Paul Jacobs's most recent album to his page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Jacobs_(organist)). Here is the CD: ( http://www.shopsfsymphony.org/shop/product.php?productid=1884&cat=83&page=1). Do I need to cite it differently? I was trying to copy the discography on Yo-Yo Ma's page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yo-Yo_Ma_discography). Sorry for the confusion, I am still quite a wikipedia noobie.
DeCombray —Preceding undated comment added 21:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello Waldhorn, I've found this, written by PETER WILLIAMS, BARBARA OWEN, in the New Grove under ORGAN STOP: Montre (Fr.). The case pipes of the French organ, corresponding to the English Open Diapason, the German Prestant, the Italian Principale, etc. Early alternative names were ‘le principal de devant’, ‘devanture en monstre’ (Reims Cathedral, 1570). The tone of the classical French Montre was somewhat more fluty than the various English Open Diapason types or German Principals. I hope this should be sufficient, however I'll try to have a more meticulous look in some other sources.
While I'm here, tell me what you think of the Organ of the Basilica of St. Martin (Weingarten) article; I've tried to make it look a bit more presentable, although obviously it still has some issues. Any hints and/or comments are more than welcome. -- Chrysalifourfour ( talk) 13:32, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Here's another reference, from G.A. AUDSLEY's Art of Organ-Building, Vol. I, p.544 ISBN 0-486-21314-5:
I'll keep my eyes open for any further references! -- Chrysalifourfour ( talk) 15:07, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
I see no reply so far, so I'll revert the edit, this time adding the citations above. You're always welcome to make more edits and/or suggestions :-) -- Chrysalifourfour ( talk) 12:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello again, I've just discovered that the English WP doesn't have an article on the Swallow's nest organ type (see de:Schwalbennestorgel) and I was wandering if you'd like to write one. I think it's a fascinating subject for us organ enthousiasts; I'd translate the above article myself, but I'm afraid my German is far from adequate. Anyway, I hope you make a start with it, or speak to someone else who might be happy to have a go. Greetings! -- Chrysalifourfour ( talk) 21:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
I thought I followed all guidelines under wikipedia rule under a7 and all rules with genuine references and links to all i have wrote about for Benighten Empire. I used no social media, blogs, and store sites for my reference, all are third party sources like reviews, main sites, and interviews by webzines, magazines, ect.
thank you for your time, and maybe you can pin point where this went wrong, everything I wrote is credible
may i remove the speedy deletion ? -- BlackMetalArea ( talk) 18:33, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello Waldhorn, please note that articles that are not written in English and/or Latin letters are not automatically patent nonsense. So unless you can read the language and can confirm that it is nonsense, please don't tag such pages for speedy deletion, but mark them with {{ notenglish}} and list them at Pages needing translation. Articles that haven't been translated within two weeks will be proposed for deletion anyway. Regards, De728631 ( talk) 17:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Waldhorn. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 19:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
The first recorded Clerestory Roofed Railway Coach preserved in the UK (albeit in poor condition) was the coach "Midland" referred to in the article, i.e. the 1874 coach.
I am not so sure about the statement 'from the mid-19th century' in the previous unedited paragraph, if treated unqualified - and will have to check this out at the NRM when I'm next at the search engine. ("Preserved Railway Carriages", Michael Harris, Ian Allen 1976, ISBN 0 7110 0664 4). So the Pullman Import (to the UK) design was relevant to the subsequent design of roof outlines of Railway Coaches here.
Of course, in the US, the roof design was in use earlier, George Pullman first fully own designed coach was "Pioneer" in 1864; the coach then being used in Pres. Lincoln's Funeral Train in 1865 (as being the most impressive 'railroad car' - US vernacular - available at that time, and tradition says the choice of Mary Todd Lincoln). This of course provided notoriety and impetus to GP's fledgling business. ( https://www.flickr.com/photos/terry_browne/galleries/72157631416127072/ - and https://www.flickr.com/search/groups/?z=t&w=2031425%40N22&m=pool&q=Lincoln%20funeral%20train ).
As to earlier built clerestory roofed coaches, I have been unable to research earlier than 1865 (US) or 1874 (UK) vehicles, so far.
Certainly your comment about being also relevant to the various Pullman pages is relevant, and I shall be looking at that - but I think a cross reference is enough to start with at least. Possibly some of this reply in a different form ought also to be added to the original article, as well. Cheers. terry nyorks ( talk) 21:56, 17 May 2014 (UTC)~
Hi! Thanks for your concern, but the link to that video was there already and was not added by me. When I clicked the link, it brought up a page saved on the webarchive. The archived version contains a trojan, yet the active page does not. I simply restored the original URL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.234.34.173 ( talk) 12:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Waldhorn...the entry was a straight entry from Spinal curvature page with no citations given. I was merging article between Human vertebral column and the different conditions-including kyphosis, and lordosis. Just thought they ought to be entered in the first place and could be picked up later for ce. It does seem that these articles could be expanded re treatment but I haven't really looked at them yet and didn't want to just leave out the material. Thanks Iztwoz ( talk) 19:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Waldhorn. Thank you for the note. The editings are based on an in-class glossary that is collected from couple of databases. To the best of my recollection, Princeton's medieval architecture and art glossary has been the main source. I will cite references after locating the databases the glossary was collected from. Meanwhile, i would appreciate your help with the supporting materials. The knowledge edited are basic definitions that could be found in any source on medieval architecture. Best. Brkzdmr ( talk) 02:05, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Waldhorn, I'm new to this and I am the CHRISTOPHER WRENCH of the article. I updated some biographical information, corrected an incorrect reference to the 'Adelaide Symphony Orchestra' (should be 'Adelaide Chamber Orchestra') as well as fixing an outdated website link to MELBA records. EG: I am no longer organist at St Mary's Kangaroo Point (the link to SMKP will verify that and confirm my new position). What is required to have these corrections restored? Musicus6 ( talk) 07:04, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Yes, thank you - I understand. The factual updates I listed are available on at least 2 of the sources already cited in the article. Musicus6 ( talk) 08:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Not sure how to respond to your msg on Wiki, so I'm trying this. Thanks so much for your feedback: I will take your suggestion!
Perhaps you can tell me the best way to respond to msgs on Wiki? I do find it difficult to use! Thanks again!
Sincerely,
Tina
TinaCFLE (
talk)
06:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. You received my earlier msg of appreciation, right? I guess Wiki keeps no record of this whatsoever. Thank you again for your help!
Sincerely,
Tina
TinaCFLE (
talk)
07:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
G'day Waldhorn, Given the wiki already has unattributed material (re Greys Law) I was wondering about the removal of association with Napoleon due to the lack of a citation for a primary source. Can you please elaborate on the subtleties therein? Frankauz ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 08:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I am wondering if you would be willing to help me write an article about a pipe organ restoration that has happened, and has been documented in the NY Times and other such sources.
Would you be willing to assist me if I did the writing, let you edit and provided all of the sources?
Thank you for your consideration. —Aristide1811
Hey Waldhorn, thank you very much for your help on that Bio warfare article. I am still researching on how to add citations and images to a Wikipedia article, but I'm sure that in a few days I'll have it figured out. Wikipedia is fun because it's a way to practice writing informational material while helping others. I'll be glad that I practiced writing this summer when I go back to school and start writing essays...
Happy editing,
Noah305
Hi Waldhorn,
Thank you for your message as regards my editing of the Corpus Christi Wikipedia page. I agree that the original manner in which I typed up my edit was not neutral (I will happily admit that I am far from unbiased when it comes to Drinking Societies), however since Wikipedia also serves to elucidate fact for all who care to discover - I feel it's important that the content of my edit be included on the page.
The simple fact is - Drinking Societies do still exist, and although it suits the college to state publicly that they have 'banned' them - they make no real effort to enforce that ban. Thus they get to have their cake and eat it.
My main concern is for prospective students who are thinking of applying to Corpus - I think it would be unfair for them to be misled on something that represents a big social issue for undergraduates who have to commit to spending three years at that college.
Tom 77.96.175.132 ( talk) 09:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Waldhorn.
Is this the place for my question? You reverted my changes to the Piano article, and before I cite a source I want to be clear what you think needs citing! I assume its the discussion about Bösendorfer rims?
Cheers. Joelthesecond ( talk) 21:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Waldhorn,
I do not yet have an account with Wikipedia, but I am certainly happy to create one if that is a problem. Yesterday was the first time I have ever made a contribution, so I am not familiar with due process.
I edited the article about efflorescence to make it impartial. The version that you have reverted is commercially biased and serves to misinform. Perhaps you are the author?
I am happy to discuss this with you further if you consider there are inaccuracies in my description., but I would recommend that my edit is reinstated.
Yours faithfully, Stonesy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.33.45 ( talk) 12:20, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Why is a sports team's roster notable yet an orchestra's is not? There are musicologists, critics and music lovers interested in that, and it's disrespectful when they get no recognition. Pakhtakorienne ( talk) 09:57, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Waldhorn, I was quite surprised to see your second reversion of my edit: I am struggling to see why the inconsistent accuracy and removal of clarifying links would be preferable in the lead. I have posted a note on the article's talk page instead of reverting. I would be interested to read your opinion. 131.111.185.66 ( talk) 18:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
I tried to add Paul Jacobs's most recent album to his page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Jacobs_(organist)). Here is the CD: ( http://www.shopsfsymphony.org/shop/product.php?productid=1884&cat=83&page=1). Do I need to cite it differently? I was trying to copy the discography on Yo-Yo Ma's page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yo-Yo_Ma_discography). Sorry for the confusion, I am still quite a wikipedia noobie.
DeCombray —Preceding undated comment added 21:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello Waldhorn, I've found this, written by PETER WILLIAMS, BARBARA OWEN, in the New Grove under ORGAN STOP: Montre (Fr.). The case pipes of the French organ, corresponding to the English Open Diapason, the German Prestant, the Italian Principale, etc. Early alternative names were ‘le principal de devant’, ‘devanture en monstre’ (Reims Cathedral, 1570). The tone of the classical French Montre was somewhat more fluty than the various English Open Diapason types or German Principals. I hope this should be sufficient, however I'll try to have a more meticulous look in some other sources.
While I'm here, tell me what you think of the Organ of the Basilica of St. Martin (Weingarten) article; I've tried to make it look a bit more presentable, although obviously it still has some issues. Any hints and/or comments are more than welcome. -- Chrysalifourfour ( talk) 13:32, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Here's another reference, from G.A. AUDSLEY's Art of Organ-Building, Vol. I, p.544 ISBN 0-486-21314-5:
I'll keep my eyes open for any further references! -- Chrysalifourfour ( talk) 15:07, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
I see no reply so far, so I'll revert the edit, this time adding the citations above. You're always welcome to make more edits and/or suggestions :-) -- Chrysalifourfour ( talk) 12:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello again, I've just discovered that the English WP doesn't have an article on the Swallow's nest organ type (see de:Schwalbennestorgel) and I was wandering if you'd like to write one. I think it's a fascinating subject for us organ enthousiasts; I'd translate the above article myself, but I'm afraid my German is far from adequate. Anyway, I hope you make a start with it, or speak to someone else who might be happy to have a go. Greetings! -- Chrysalifourfour ( talk) 21:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
I thought I followed all guidelines under wikipedia rule under a7 and all rules with genuine references and links to all i have wrote about for Benighten Empire. I used no social media, blogs, and store sites for my reference, all are third party sources like reviews, main sites, and interviews by webzines, magazines, ect.
thank you for your time, and maybe you can pin point where this went wrong, everything I wrote is credible
may i remove the speedy deletion ? -- BlackMetalArea ( talk) 18:33, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello Waldhorn, please note that articles that are not written in English and/or Latin letters are not automatically patent nonsense. So unless you can read the language and can confirm that it is nonsense, please don't tag such pages for speedy deletion, but mark them with {{ notenglish}} and list them at Pages needing translation. Articles that haven't been translated within two weeks will be proposed for deletion anyway. Regards, De728631 ( talk) 17:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Waldhorn. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 19:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
The first recorded Clerestory Roofed Railway Coach preserved in the UK (albeit in poor condition) was the coach "Midland" referred to in the article, i.e. the 1874 coach.
I am not so sure about the statement 'from the mid-19th century' in the previous unedited paragraph, if treated unqualified - and will have to check this out at the NRM when I'm next at the search engine. ("Preserved Railway Carriages", Michael Harris, Ian Allen 1976, ISBN 0 7110 0664 4). So the Pullman Import (to the UK) design was relevant to the subsequent design of roof outlines of Railway Coaches here.
Of course, in the US, the roof design was in use earlier, George Pullman first fully own designed coach was "Pioneer" in 1864; the coach then being used in Pres. Lincoln's Funeral Train in 1865 (as being the most impressive 'railroad car' - US vernacular - available at that time, and tradition says the choice of Mary Todd Lincoln). This of course provided notoriety and impetus to GP's fledgling business. ( https://www.flickr.com/photos/terry_browne/galleries/72157631416127072/ - and https://www.flickr.com/search/groups/?z=t&w=2031425%40N22&m=pool&q=Lincoln%20funeral%20train ).
As to earlier built clerestory roofed coaches, I have been unable to research earlier than 1865 (US) or 1874 (UK) vehicles, so far.
Certainly your comment about being also relevant to the various Pullman pages is relevant, and I shall be looking at that - but I think a cross reference is enough to start with at least. Possibly some of this reply in a different form ought also to be added to the original article, as well. Cheers. terry nyorks ( talk) 21:56, 17 May 2014 (UTC)~
Hi! Thanks for your concern, but the link to that video was there already and was not added by me. When I clicked the link, it brought up a page saved on the webarchive. The archived version contains a trojan, yet the active page does not. I simply restored the original URL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.234.34.173 ( talk) 12:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Waldhorn...the entry was a straight entry from Spinal curvature page with no citations given. I was merging article between Human vertebral column and the different conditions-including kyphosis, and lordosis. Just thought they ought to be entered in the first place and could be picked up later for ce. It does seem that these articles could be expanded re treatment but I haven't really looked at them yet and didn't want to just leave out the material. Thanks Iztwoz ( talk) 19:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Waldhorn. Thank you for the note. The editings are based on an in-class glossary that is collected from couple of databases. To the best of my recollection, Princeton's medieval architecture and art glossary has been the main source. I will cite references after locating the databases the glossary was collected from. Meanwhile, i would appreciate your help with the supporting materials. The knowledge edited are basic definitions that could be found in any source on medieval architecture. Best. Brkzdmr ( talk) 02:05, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Waldhorn, I'm new to this and I am the CHRISTOPHER WRENCH of the article. I updated some biographical information, corrected an incorrect reference to the 'Adelaide Symphony Orchestra' (should be 'Adelaide Chamber Orchestra') as well as fixing an outdated website link to MELBA records. EG: I am no longer organist at St Mary's Kangaroo Point (the link to SMKP will verify that and confirm my new position). What is required to have these corrections restored? Musicus6 ( talk) 07:04, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Yes, thank you - I understand. The factual updates I listed are available on at least 2 of the sources already cited in the article. Musicus6 ( talk) 08:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Not sure how to respond to your msg on Wiki, so I'm trying this. Thanks so much for your feedback: I will take your suggestion!
Perhaps you can tell me the best way to respond to msgs on Wiki? I do find it difficult to use! Thanks again!
Sincerely,
Tina
TinaCFLE (
talk)
06:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. You received my earlier msg of appreciation, right? I guess Wiki keeps no record of this whatsoever. Thank you again for your help!
Sincerely,
Tina
TinaCFLE (
talk)
07:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
G'day Waldhorn, Given the wiki already has unattributed material (re Greys Law) I was wondering about the removal of association with Napoleon due to the lack of a citation for a primary source. Can you please elaborate on the subtleties therein? Frankauz ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 08:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I am wondering if you would be willing to help me write an article about a pipe organ restoration that has happened, and has been documented in the NY Times and other such sources.
Would you be willing to assist me if I did the writing, let you edit and provided all of the sources?
Thank you for your consideration. —Aristide1811
Hey Waldhorn, thank you very much for your help on that Bio warfare article. I am still researching on how to add citations and images to a Wikipedia article, but I'm sure that in a few days I'll have it figured out. Wikipedia is fun because it's a way to practice writing informational material while helping others. I'll be glad that I practiced writing this summer when I go back to school and start writing essays...
Happy editing,
Noah305
Hi Waldhorn,
Thank you for your message as regards my editing of the Corpus Christi Wikipedia page. I agree that the original manner in which I typed up my edit was not neutral (I will happily admit that I am far from unbiased when it comes to Drinking Societies), however since Wikipedia also serves to elucidate fact for all who care to discover - I feel it's important that the content of my edit be included on the page.
The simple fact is - Drinking Societies do still exist, and although it suits the college to state publicly that they have 'banned' them - they make no real effort to enforce that ban. Thus they get to have their cake and eat it.
My main concern is for prospective students who are thinking of applying to Corpus - I think it would be unfair for them to be misled on something that represents a big social issue for undergraduates who have to commit to spending three years at that college.
Tom 77.96.175.132 ( talk) 09:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Waldhorn.
Is this the place for my question? You reverted my changes to the Piano article, and before I cite a source I want to be clear what you think needs citing! I assume its the discussion about Bösendorfer rims?
Cheers. Joelthesecond ( talk) 21:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Waldhorn,
I do not yet have an account with Wikipedia, but I am certainly happy to create one if that is a problem. Yesterday was the first time I have ever made a contribution, so I am not familiar with due process.
I edited the article about efflorescence to make it impartial. The version that you have reverted is commercially biased and serves to misinform. Perhaps you are the author?
I am happy to discuss this with you further if you consider there are inaccuracies in my description., but I would recommend that my edit is reinstated.
Yours faithfully, Stonesy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.33.45 ( talk) 12:20, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Why is a sports team's roster notable yet an orchestra's is not? There are musicologists, critics and music lovers interested in that, and it's disrespectful when they get no recognition. Pakhtakorienne ( talk) 09:57, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Waldhorn, I was quite surprised to see your second reversion of my edit: I am struggling to see why the inconsistent accuracy and removal of clarifying links would be preferable in the lead. I have posted a note on the article's talk page instead of reverting. I would be interested to read your opinion. 131.111.185.66 ( talk) 18:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)