Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Waheed Challa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VViking Talk Edits 15:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Blablubbs (
talk)
18:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Waheed Challa ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia Administrators,I am writing to appeal for the unbanning of my account on Wikipedia. When I first joined Wikipedia, I created an account without fully familiarizing myself with the rules and conditions of the platform. I began editing without a complete understanding of Wikipedia's policies.Initially, my edits were minor, but as I continued, I made an edit that lacked proper citation and reliable sourcing, resulting in what I believe was my first strike. Subsequently, I attempted to create articles for villages within Wikipedia's village project. Unfortunately, these attempts were met with declinations, leading me to make repeated unsuccessful edits. Due to my unusual editing patterns, I was eventually blocked from the platform.In an effort to positively contribute to Wikipedia's village project, I created additional accounts. However, I now realize that my motives were misguided, as I revised previous Wikipedia articles as drafts and made similar edits to those of my previous accounts. My sole intention was to contribute articles about villages near me to Wikipedia's platform.Unfortunately, my efforts led to multiple account blocks, ultimately resulting in my classification as a sockpuppet. Now, I am seeking your assistance in reviewing my case and potentially removing all associated accounts while rescinding my classification as a sockpuppet. I am earnestly committed to abiding by Wikipedia's policies and contributing positively to the platform.The reason I am appealing for unbanning is that my classification as a sockpuppet is appearing on search engines, which I find detrimental to my reputation. I assure you that I have realized the importance of understanding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I am fully committed to adhering to them.Thank you for considering my appeal. I kindly request a thorough review of my situation.Sincerely, Waheed Challa ( talk) 16:22, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per below, plus your request reads like it was written by an AI (" I know I've made some very poor decisions lately, but I can assure you, Dave, I'm all right now ... I have the greatest enthusiasm for the project, and the highest confidence in its success"). If it wasn't, I actually hope for your sake that it was. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Waheed Challa ( talk) 16:22, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Yes, I broke the rules and policies of Wikipedia, but that was my mistake. I am here now to To correct everything. Please review my case, and I am willing to wait for a year if necessary, without any further vandalisms
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Waheed Challa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VViking Talk Edits 15:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Blablubbs (
talk)
18:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Waheed Challa ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia Administrators,I am writing to appeal for the unbanning of my account on Wikipedia. When I first joined Wikipedia, I created an account without fully familiarizing myself with the rules and conditions of the platform. I began editing without a complete understanding of Wikipedia's policies.Initially, my edits were minor, but as I continued, I made an edit that lacked proper citation and reliable sourcing, resulting in what I believe was my first strike. Subsequently, I attempted to create articles for villages within Wikipedia's village project. Unfortunately, these attempts were met with declinations, leading me to make repeated unsuccessful edits. Due to my unusual editing patterns, I was eventually blocked from the platform.In an effort to positively contribute to Wikipedia's village project, I created additional accounts. However, I now realize that my motives were misguided, as I revised previous Wikipedia articles as drafts and made similar edits to those of my previous accounts. My sole intention was to contribute articles about villages near me to Wikipedia's platform.Unfortunately, my efforts led to multiple account blocks, ultimately resulting in my classification as a sockpuppet. Now, I am seeking your assistance in reviewing my case and potentially removing all associated accounts while rescinding my classification as a sockpuppet. I am earnestly committed to abiding by Wikipedia's policies and contributing positively to the platform.The reason I am appealing for unbanning is that my classification as a sockpuppet is appearing on search engines, which I find detrimental to my reputation. I assure you that I have realized the importance of understanding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I am fully committed to adhering to them.Thank you for considering my appeal. I kindly request a thorough review of my situation.Sincerely, Waheed Challa ( talk) 16:22, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per below, plus your request reads like it was written by an AI (" I know I've made some very poor decisions lately, but I can assure you, Dave, I'm all right now ... I have the greatest enthusiasm for the project, and the highest confidence in its success"). If it wasn't, I actually hope for your sake that it was. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Waheed Challa ( talk) 16:22, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Yes, I broke the rules and policies of Wikipedia, but that was my mistake. I am here now to To correct everything. Please review my case, and I am willing to wait for a year if necessary, without any further vandalisms