Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for
your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important
core policy. Thank you.
OhNoitsJamie
Talk
15:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to
Kiss. Wikipedia is
not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach
consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves
images, you also have the option to
configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. —
Jeff G. ツ
(talk)
00:07, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Kiss. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jasper Deng (talk) 00:54, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Your edit pattern is becoming
disruptive. Please adhere to the following policies, or you may be
blocked from editing:
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view - please do not make statements attacking homosexuals on Wikipedia. Not everyone agrees with you.
- Wikipedia:Ownership of articles - your talk page is not owned by you. It is not your "personal message space." Only the community owns the pages on Wikipedia.
- Wikipedia:Assume good faith - you may not mislabel other people's edits as "vandalism" when they are not - vandalism has a strict definition that doesn't include things like my warnings.
- Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not censored - Wikipedia is not censored, therefore you have no reason to remove images just because you don't like them.
If you continue violating these, I will ask an administrator to block you. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:52, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for
your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important
core policy. Thank you.
OhNoitsJamie
Talk
15:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to
Kiss. Wikipedia is
not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach
consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves
images, you also have the option to
configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. —
Jeff G. ツ
(talk)
00:07, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Kiss. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jasper Deng (talk) 00:54, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Your edit pattern is becoming
disruptive. Please adhere to the following policies, or you may be
blocked from editing:
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view - please do not make statements attacking homosexuals on Wikipedia. Not everyone agrees with you.
- Wikipedia:Ownership of articles - your talk page is not owned by you. It is not your "personal message space." Only the community owns the pages on Wikipedia.
- Wikipedia:Assume good faith - you may not mislabel other people's edits as "vandalism" when they are not - vandalism has a strict definition that doesn't include things like my warnings.
- Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not censored - Wikipedia is not censored, therefore you have no reason to remove images just because you don't like them.
If you continue violating these, I will ask an administrator to block you. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:52, 24 September 2011 (UTC)