|
Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).
A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.
You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
{{
unblock-un|your new username here}}
on
your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case ( talk) 13:17, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Vvolume ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
How did I vandalize anything? Volume! is a serious academic journal - I just created the page and was improving it progressively… don't understand! Plus, I used the name "Vvolume" to be honest about my contributions : I'm not pretending I don't contribute (benevolently) to the journal… help!
Decline reason:
As TParis stated below, and per your block notice above, you are only blocked because of your user name. Per
WP:ORGNAME we do not accept user names that represent an organization. You can request an unblock to change your name by using this template: {{
unblock-un|your new username here}}
--
Atama
頭
17:24, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock-un|Vvolume}}
Anything that seems too apologetical should be taken out of the Volume ! page (please tell me where, if you consider this to be the case), but I'm doing my best to present it honestly. Thanks!
Vvolume (
talk)
17:35, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
The article Volume! The French journal of popular music studies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Steve Quinn (
talk)
05:48, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
The article Volume! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Tomwsulcer (
talk)
17:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Volume! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volume! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tomwsulcer ( talk) 21:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
|
Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).
A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.
You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
{{
unblock-un|your new username here}}
on
your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case ( talk) 13:17, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Vvolume ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
How did I vandalize anything? Volume! is a serious academic journal - I just created the page and was improving it progressively… don't understand! Plus, I used the name "Vvolume" to be honest about my contributions : I'm not pretending I don't contribute (benevolently) to the journal… help!
Decline reason:
As TParis stated below, and per your block notice above, you are only blocked because of your user name. Per
WP:ORGNAME we do not accept user names that represent an organization. You can request an unblock to change your name by using this template: {{
unblock-un|your new username here}}
--
Atama
頭
17:24, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock-un|Vvolume}}
Anything that seems too apologetical should be taken out of the Volume ! page (please tell me where, if you consider this to be the case), but I'm doing my best to present it honestly. Thanks!
Vvolume (
talk)
17:35, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
The article Volume! The French journal of popular music studies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Steve Quinn (
talk)
05:48, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
The article Volume! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Tomwsulcer (
talk)
17:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Volume! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volume! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tomwsulcer ( talk) 21:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)