ABOUT MY ARCHIVES
Past topics I · Past topics II · Past topics III · Past topics IV · Past topics V · Past Topics VI · Past Topics VII · Past Topics VIII · Past Topics IX · Past Topics X
Past Topics XI · Past Topics XII · Past Topics XIII · Past Topics XIV · Past Topics XV · Past Topics XVI · Past Topics XVII · Past Topics XVIII · Past Topics XIX
Past Topics XX · Past Topics XXI · Past Topics XXII · Past Topics XXIII · Past Topics XXIV · Past Topics XXV · Past Topics XXVI · Past Topics XXVII
Schoolwork · AfC · DYKs etc. · Resolved notices
Thank you for de-populating Category:Unassessed Opera articles. This has bugged me for a long time, but I didn't have the guts. -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 12:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks much for your help at my talk page. :) The template that drew the unhappy reply was {{ Uw-copyright-new}}, which was intended to be less bitey than {{ Uw-copyright}}. His response suggests that he still found it offensive. :/ Maybe it's the inclusion of "plagiarism" in the headline? Do you see any way that could be made better? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:23, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for clarifying things for me in our recent debacle. I regret the tone I used to characterise your edits and I hope this won't affect a future constructive editing collaboration. Claret Ash 11:52, 20 January 2012 (UTC) |
Hi Voceditenore! I was so excited to see that WP:Opera is going to participate in Women's History Month! Anything I can do to help, promote and contribute, just let me know. ...you know, I've never been to the opera. Someday, I hope! SarahStierch ( talk) 23:23, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
I recently came across an article on the José Iturbi International Piano Competition which was in a poor state. I then went to the competition's website here which states that the competition has two tracks: one for pianists and the other opera singers. I accordingly moved the wikipedia article to the José Iturbi International Music Competition (which was a redirect previously) since it seemed to be a more appropriate title. However, the history for the competition given in the article does not appear to match the history given at the competition's website see here, which makes me question whether there may be more than one competition with this name. Perhaps you might be able to help me solve this puzzle/correct this tangle? 4meter4 ( talk) 19:58, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Voceditenore, Our conversation with User:Jean GUERIN 2 concerning Jean-Vital Jammes has been interesting, to say the least. He is inexperienced with the Wikipedia, but well motivated. However, I wanted to make some comments about formatting links in the sources, which is not specific to that article, so I thought I would put it here, where it won't distract. I realize it is common practice to link titles to online sources. I want to explain why I prefer to link the page references, book titles, and online copies separately. In some situations an article may cite more than one page in a source, so keeping links to specific pages and/or text in the notes section allows more than one page location for a particular source to be linked. In the source list itself, it makes sense to link the title page of the online copy, which is after all the location of the bibliographic information in the citation. This practice also makes the citation universal, ie, the item in the source list can easily be copied and pasted, without further editing, into other articles where the source may also be used. There are also advantages to keeping the links to online copies in the same location where we usually put an ISBN or OCLC number. I started doing this for cases like the following:
It may be better to reserve titles for linking to Wikipedia articles about the books, and keep links to online copies in a similar location to OCLC numbers and ISBNs. This location also allows us to identify the website where the copy is located, and in cases where there are two online copies, for example, the Internet Archive and Google Books, one can link both and let the reader know ahead of time exactly where the link is going. These copies are sometimes identical, but sometimes not. Different scanned copies can have errors, so that some pages are unreadable. Linking both lets the reader know that alternatives are available. Also, I personally find that the book browser and book text search facility for the Internet Archive is awfully slow, especially for long books. The copies at Google Books can generally be searched and browsed much more efficiently. However, I can see that some readers might prefer to use the Internet Archive reader. Isn't it better to give the reader a choice? -- Robert.Allen ( talk) 18:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for initializing the Wikipedia article about Jean-Vital !
However, this article has been written from sources which are compilation books or newspapers copying one another without any verification. I have been gathering precise and official documents about Jean-Vital for about six years. These are either official French documents or family documents and photographs. My documents are “primary sources” in Wikipedia understanding, but I assert that they approach the truth closier than fanciful texts of “Touchatout” ! I will try during the next weeks to give you more valid information according to the rules of Wikipedia.
Sincerely yours,
Jean GUERIN - Paris 21:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jean GUERIN 2 (
talk •
contribs)
This seems like it could have been uploaded to Commons, since the photographer died in 1931. I'm curious why you decided to upload it to the English Wikipedia. (There is apparently a big effort underway to move files like these to Commons. Not sure why.) -- Robert.Allen ( talk) 22:27, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
I saw that this very useful file that you made was moved to Commons, and created a new category for it. You may want to check it over to make sure everything is OK. Thanks! -- Robert.Allen ( talk) 23:12, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
I looked for a guideline that gave guidance concerning the location of this section, but I wasn't able to find one. So with the two examples I found where it was place below the references, I thought it was worth a try. I think it might actually be preferable since this puts it nearer to the Categories which is another method for finding related articles. But I realize, of course, that it is almost always just before the references. -- Robert.Allen ( talk) 08:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region. |
You have new messages on my tp. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 00:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
FYI Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Voce. I just caught and deleted David Lively as G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.joseph-marx.org/artist-biographies/david-lively.html © 2001-2006 Berkant Haydin. The entire page was copied verbatim with just a few very minor rephrasings, and Wikilinks. My concern is, that User talk:Clover999 as the major contributor (but not creator) to Claudio Arrau may have introduced text or sections copied from other sources. This is the only other article to which he has contributed to any extent - he only has a total of 77 edits. What do you think? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
I was traumatized because someone deleted Ibraimh Tatlises and Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan from the tenor page without due process... so thanks for sourcing Ibo. As for the great Ustad NFAK, any search for "Nusrat Jeff Buckley" should do. AFAIK, Jeff was the main source of comments on NFAK's voice from a fellow-singer perspective.
This is from a guy who likes writing in Wikipedia but finds the current reference format too tiresome to even contemplate (I have some 2000 edits). So, thanks again. elpincha ( talk) 13:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Women's History for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. - Mabeenot ( talk) 01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Voceditenore. I've seen you've deleted the english translation of the biography of Javier Vargas I filed few days ago. This translation was made by a partner of Javier, and I'm allowed to use it. I wonder if there is a problem, and the cause it was removed. Greetings Blues power — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blues power ( talk • contribs) 16:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
I received your reply. The reference to the copyright of Warner Music Spain is not correct. The text entered is an english translation of the spanish biography of Javier Vargas in Wikipedia, and i´m the author of a good part of this text. The translation was done by Annie Altamirano, an english teacher and personal friend of Javier and myself. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blues power ( talk • contribs) 18:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Voceditenore, I was posting something on RS/N about the same time as you. If that's a cause for concern I will be happy to withdraw my issue or attempt to merge mine into yours. I was not attempting to distract others from the issues you raised. -- Salimfadhley ( talk) 11:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
The article " Holy Roman Empire" says clearly..."In a decree following the 1512 Diet of Cologne, the name was officially changed to Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation
no valid reason to remove that, as that IS what it was fully called, and is accurate, and good faith. Simply because “you don’t like” is not a valid WP reason to disrespectfully undo or remove. The elaboration is valid, better, clearer, and it stays...see talk.
his is just one example of WP policy on it, and it says clearly:
"Do not revert verifiable changes that may be an improvement just to maintain status quo or to comply with the "discuss all changes first" approach, which may run counter to the Wikipedia be bold policy." Or " Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary".
And "Only revert obvious vandalism. Instead of removing or reverting changes or additions you may not like."
These are all words from WP help, and recommendation. I did not make up the recommendation. WP policy is clear that you are NOT to undo an edit that’s proven to be accurate, per other WP articles,& per outside sources, simply because you “don’t like” it, with the lame front excuse of “consensus”. The word “consensus” is not some magic wand, if there’s nothing else. “Holy Roman Empire” article is clear.... Good day. Hashem sfarim ( talk) 22:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. :) Would you mind offering a second opinion on Antony Polonsky at its talk page? The author has rewritten to address close paraphrasing concerns. I've removed the tag, but would just like a fresh set of eyes to look at the formulation as it stands against the source ( [2]). I don't want there to be copyright issues, so I want to make sure that I'm not seeing what I want to see. If I am, I welcome your dispassionate and every so finely nuanced input. :D -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:29, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Voceditenore, many thanks for the research & the comments, :) It may take me a day or 3 to get my head around this material. It's all interesting, thanks to you I may end up addicted to this blog [3] & this [4]. Mick gold ( talk) 15:06, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Cordiali Saluti da Campora San Giovanni e gentile richiesta di rilettura e miglioria per Radio Studio 54 Network, grazie come sempre di vero cuore-- Lodewijk Vadacchino ( talk) 04:09, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Buongiorno a Lei da Campora San Giovanni,
le scrivo per sapere come sta e per salutarla ed augurarle un eccellente weekend qualora non ci dovessimo sentire prima. Oltre a questo le chiedo sempre e comunque gentilmente una breve rilettura dell'articolo creato qualche giorno fa sulla radio ammiraglia della mia regione natale, e che viene ascoltata quasi in mezzo sud Italia. giusto una decina di minuti per migliorare la morfologia, la grammatica e la sintassi in inglese. le chiedo sempre e comunque gentilmente le chiedo come si mette lo streaming della radio che in questo caso si trova cliccando su on air nel sito della radio sennò esce così, ad ogni modo la ringrazio per tutto quello che ha fatto, fa e farà per me. Un Luminoso Saluto dalla Calabria, con l'augurio che possa venirci a visitare presto-- Lodewijk Vadacchino ( talk) 04:09, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
FYI. 28bytes ( talk) 15:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
My recent edit is in the middle of a thread at AN here. As it responds to a point you made, I wanted to let you know.
While the editor in question has behaved badly, I think we as a community failed. I'm trying to figure out what went wrong. My analysis may well be flawed, but I think we could have done better. -- SPhilbrick (Talk) 22:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Ta for this - I have been away for a few days -best Smerus ( talk) 21:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for doing what I was afraid to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikfr ( talk • contribs) 15:44, 14 June 2012
Hi,
I may be rude but I'm good. Drop in some time for a chat.
Your Persistent Vandal..)))))))))
Amanbir Singh.
ps: mishal husain my sister...in house matter..hope you understand...))))
you seem like a very sweet guy....i wish i was you..i wish... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.111.137 ( talk • contribs) 18:42, 3 July 2012
Given what Classmusic posted on the JC talkpage and on my own talkpage ("Your attempts and collusion here and elsewhere have nothing to do with the substantive discussion of articles at hand" - yes he means you, too!) I've moved the discussion here. Hopefully some helpful admin will take control of the situation.... Happy editing ;-) almost- instinct 08:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
...see what I added in this diff almost- instinct 16:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Voceditenore, Thank you so much for restoring this article. I had wanted to do this but could not untangle the history. I am very interested in theatre articles and it always disappoints me to see one of them in trouble. Especially a key theatre like this one.-- Foobarnix ( talk) 11:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
For the lovely sapphire, see User talk:Voceditenore/Archive 3
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Voceditenore/Archive_17. |
ABOUT MY ARCHIVES
Past topics I · Past topics II · Past topics III · Past topics IV · Past topics V · Past Topics VI · Past Topics VII · Past Topics VIII · Past Topics IX · Past Topics X
Past Topics XI · Past Topics XII · Past Topics XIII · Past Topics XIV · Past Topics XV · Past Topics XVI · Past Topics XVII · Past Topics XVIII · Past Topics XIX
Past Topics XX · Past Topics XXI · Past Topics XXII · Past Topics XXIII · Past Topics XXIV · Past Topics XXV · Past Topics XXVI · Past Topics XXVII
Schoolwork · AfC · DYKs etc. · Resolved notices
Thank you for de-populating Category:Unassessed Opera articles. This has bugged me for a long time, but I didn't have the guts. -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 12:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks much for your help at my talk page. :) The template that drew the unhappy reply was {{ Uw-copyright-new}}, which was intended to be less bitey than {{ Uw-copyright}}. His response suggests that he still found it offensive. :/ Maybe it's the inclusion of "plagiarism" in the headline? Do you see any way that could be made better? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:23, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for clarifying things for me in our recent debacle. I regret the tone I used to characterise your edits and I hope this won't affect a future constructive editing collaboration. Claret Ash 11:52, 20 January 2012 (UTC) |
Hi Voceditenore! I was so excited to see that WP:Opera is going to participate in Women's History Month! Anything I can do to help, promote and contribute, just let me know. ...you know, I've never been to the opera. Someday, I hope! SarahStierch ( talk) 23:23, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
I recently came across an article on the José Iturbi International Piano Competition which was in a poor state. I then went to the competition's website here which states that the competition has two tracks: one for pianists and the other opera singers. I accordingly moved the wikipedia article to the José Iturbi International Music Competition (which was a redirect previously) since it seemed to be a more appropriate title. However, the history for the competition given in the article does not appear to match the history given at the competition's website see here, which makes me question whether there may be more than one competition with this name. Perhaps you might be able to help me solve this puzzle/correct this tangle? 4meter4 ( talk) 19:58, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Voceditenore, Our conversation with User:Jean GUERIN 2 concerning Jean-Vital Jammes has been interesting, to say the least. He is inexperienced with the Wikipedia, but well motivated. However, I wanted to make some comments about formatting links in the sources, which is not specific to that article, so I thought I would put it here, where it won't distract. I realize it is common practice to link titles to online sources. I want to explain why I prefer to link the page references, book titles, and online copies separately. In some situations an article may cite more than one page in a source, so keeping links to specific pages and/or text in the notes section allows more than one page location for a particular source to be linked. In the source list itself, it makes sense to link the title page of the online copy, which is after all the location of the bibliographic information in the citation. This practice also makes the citation universal, ie, the item in the source list can easily be copied and pasted, without further editing, into other articles where the source may also be used. There are also advantages to keeping the links to online copies in the same location where we usually put an ISBN or OCLC number. I started doing this for cases like the following:
It may be better to reserve titles for linking to Wikipedia articles about the books, and keep links to online copies in a similar location to OCLC numbers and ISBNs. This location also allows us to identify the website where the copy is located, and in cases where there are two online copies, for example, the Internet Archive and Google Books, one can link both and let the reader know ahead of time exactly where the link is going. These copies are sometimes identical, but sometimes not. Different scanned copies can have errors, so that some pages are unreadable. Linking both lets the reader know that alternatives are available. Also, I personally find that the book browser and book text search facility for the Internet Archive is awfully slow, especially for long books. The copies at Google Books can generally be searched and browsed much more efficiently. However, I can see that some readers might prefer to use the Internet Archive reader. Isn't it better to give the reader a choice? -- Robert.Allen ( talk) 18:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for initializing the Wikipedia article about Jean-Vital !
However, this article has been written from sources which are compilation books or newspapers copying one another without any verification. I have been gathering precise and official documents about Jean-Vital for about six years. These are either official French documents or family documents and photographs. My documents are “primary sources” in Wikipedia understanding, but I assert that they approach the truth closier than fanciful texts of “Touchatout” ! I will try during the next weeks to give you more valid information according to the rules of Wikipedia.
Sincerely yours,
Jean GUERIN - Paris 21:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jean GUERIN 2 (
talk •
contribs)
This seems like it could have been uploaded to Commons, since the photographer died in 1931. I'm curious why you decided to upload it to the English Wikipedia. (There is apparently a big effort underway to move files like these to Commons. Not sure why.) -- Robert.Allen ( talk) 22:27, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
I saw that this very useful file that you made was moved to Commons, and created a new category for it. You may want to check it over to make sure everything is OK. Thanks! -- Robert.Allen ( talk) 23:12, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
I looked for a guideline that gave guidance concerning the location of this section, but I wasn't able to find one. So with the two examples I found where it was place below the references, I thought it was worth a try. I think it might actually be preferable since this puts it nearer to the Categories which is another method for finding related articles. But I realize, of course, that it is almost always just before the references. -- Robert.Allen ( talk) 08:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region. |
You have new messages on my tp. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 00:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
FYI Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Voce. I just caught and deleted David Lively as G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.joseph-marx.org/artist-biographies/david-lively.html © 2001-2006 Berkant Haydin. The entire page was copied verbatim with just a few very minor rephrasings, and Wikilinks. My concern is, that User talk:Clover999 as the major contributor (but not creator) to Claudio Arrau may have introduced text or sections copied from other sources. This is the only other article to which he has contributed to any extent - he only has a total of 77 edits. What do you think? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
I was traumatized because someone deleted Ibraimh Tatlises and Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan from the tenor page without due process... so thanks for sourcing Ibo. As for the great Ustad NFAK, any search for "Nusrat Jeff Buckley" should do. AFAIK, Jeff was the main source of comments on NFAK's voice from a fellow-singer perspective.
This is from a guy who likes writing in Wikipedia but finds the current reference format too tiresome to even contemplate (I have some 2000 edits). So, thanks again. elpincha ( talk) 13:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Women's History for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. - Mabeenot ( talk) 01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Voceditenore. I've seen you've deleted the english translation of the biography of Javier Vargas I filed few days ago. This translation was made by a partner of Javier, and I'm allowed to use it. I wonder if there is a problem, and the cause it was removed. Greetings Blues power — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blues power ( talk • contribs) 16:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
I received your reply. The reference to the copyright of Warner Music Spain is not correct. The text entered is an english translation of the spanish biography of Javier Vargas in Wikipedia, and i´m the author of a good part of this text. The translation was done by Annie Altamirano, an english teacher and personal friend of Javier and myself. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blues power ( talk • contribs) 18:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Voceditenore, I was posting something on RS/N about the same time as you. If that's a cause for concern I will be happy to withdraw my issue or attempt to merge mine into yours. I was not attempting to distract others from the issues you raised. -- Salimfadhley ( talk) 11:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
The article " Holy Roman Empire" says clearly..."In a decree following the 1512 Diet of Cologne, the name was officially changed to Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation
no valid reason to remove that, as that IS what it was fully called, and is accurate, and good faith. Simply because “you don’t like” is not a valid WP reason to disrespectfully undo or remove. The elaboration is valid, better, clearer, and it stays...see talk.
his is just one example of WP policy on it, and it says clearly:
"Do not revert verifiable changes that may be an improvement just to maintain status quo or to comply with the "discuss all changes first" approach, which may run counter to the Wikipedia be bold policy." Or " Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary".
And "Only revert obvious vandalism. Instead of removing or reverting changes or additions you may not like."
These are all words from WP help, and recommendation. I did not make up the recommendation. WP policy is clear that you are NOT to undo an edit that’s proven to be accurate, per other WP articles,& per outside sources, simply because you “don’t like” it, with the lame front excuse of “consensus”. The word “consensus” is not some magic wand, if there’s nothing else. “Holy Roman Empire” article is clear.... Good day. Hashem sfarim ( talk) 22:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. :) Would you mind offering a second opinion on Antony Polonsky at its talk page? The author has rewritten to address close paraphrasing concerns. I've removed the tag, but would just like a fresh set of eyes to look at the formulation as it stands against the source ( [2]). I don't want there to be copyright issues, so I want to make sure that I'm not seeing what I want to see. If I am, I welcome your dispassionate and every so finely nuanced input. :D -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:29, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Voceditenore, many thanks for the research & the comments, :) It may take me a day or 3 to get my head around this material. It's all interesting, thanks to you I may end up addicted to this blog [3] & this [4]. Mick gold ( talk) 15:06, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Cordiali Saluti da Campora San Giovanni e gentile richiesta di rilettura e miglioria per Radio Studio 54 Network, grazie come sempre di vero cuore-- Lodewijk Vadacchino ( talk) 04:09, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Buongiorno a Lei da Campora San Giovanni,
le scrivo per sapere come sta e per salutarla ed augurarle un eccellente weekend qualora non ci dovessimo sentire prima. Oltre a questo le chiedo sempre e comunque gentilmente una breve rilettura dell'articolo creato qualche giorno fa sulla radio ammiraglia della mia regione natale, e che viene ascoltata quasi in mezzo sud Italia. giusto una decina di minuti per migliorare la morfologia, la grammatica e la sintassi in inglese. le chiedo sempre e comunque gentilmente le chiedo come si mette lo streaming della radio che in questo caso si trova cliccando su on air nel sito della radio sennò esce così, ad ogni modo la ringrazio per tutto quello che ha fatto, fa e farà per me. Un Luminoso Saluto dalla Calabria, con l'augurio che possa venirci a visitare presto-- Lodewijk Vadacchino ( talk) 04:09, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
FYI. 28bytes ( talk) 15:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
My recent edit is in the middle of a thread at AN here. As it responds to a point you made, I wanted to let you know.
While the editor in question has behaved badly, I think we as a community failed. I'm trying to figure out what went wrong. My analysis may well be flawed, but I think we could have done better. -- SPhilbrick (Talk) 22:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Ta for this - I have been away for a few days -best Smerus ( talk) 21:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for doing what I was afraid to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikfr ( talk • contribs) 15:44, 14 June 2012
Hi,
I may be rude but I'm good. Drop in some time for a chat.
Your Persistent Vandal..)))))))))
Amanbir Singh.
ps: mishal husain my sister...in house matter..hope you understand...))))
you seem like a very sweet guy....i wish i was you..i wish... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.111.137 ( talk • contribs) 18:42, 3 July 2012
Given what Classmusic posted on the JC talkpage and on my own talkpage ("Your attempts and collusion here and elsewhere have nothing to do with the substantive discussion of articles at hand" - yes he means you, too!) I've moved the discussion here. Hopefully some helpful admin will take control of the situation.... Happy editing ;-) almost- instinct 08:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
...see what I added in this diff almost- instinct 16:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Voceditenore, Thank you so much for restoring this article. I had wanted to do this but could not untangle the history. I am very interested in theatre articles and it always disappoints me to see one of them in trouble. Especially a key theatre like this one.-- Foobarnix ( talk) 11:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
For the lovely sapphire, see User talk:Voceditenore/Archive 3
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Voceditenore/Archive_17. |