Not Happy With My Editz.... feel free to buzz me.....
|
Speedy deletion nomination of CtrlS
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on CtrlS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gsingh ( talk) 04:30, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of CtrlS for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CtrlS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CtrlS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gsingh ( talk) 17:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Vivinvarghesemeleadan and welcome to Wikipedia. As a relatively new editor, you may not be aware that it's quite OK for articles to contain "red links" (like this) to other articles which don't exist yet, but which may be created in the future - see WP:RED for more information. Also, I would encourage you to provide edit summaries for all your edits - it makes it easier for other editors to know why you have made changes to an article. Feel free to leave a message at my talk page if you have any questions about these issues or anything else. Regards. DH85868993 ( talk) 08:12, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. I have reverted the changes you made. Regarding your article, the concern is not so much the quality of the article (although some of the article appears to be a direct copy of another website, which is not allowed by Wikipedia's copyright policy), but the fact that the company is not sufficiently notable to warrant an article on Wikipedia. Regards. DH85868993 ( talk) 02:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Not Happy With My Editz.... feel free to buzz me.....
|
|
Speedy deletion nomination of CtrlS
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on CtrlS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gsingh ( talk) 04:30, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of CtrlS for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CtrlS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CtrlS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gsingh ( talk) 17:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Vivinvarghesemeleadan and welcome to Wikipedia. As a relatively new editor, you may not be aware that it's quite OK for articles to contain "red links" (like this) to other articles which don't exist yet, but which may be created in the future - see WP:RED for more information. Also, I would encourage you to provide edit summaries for all your edits - it makes it easier for other editors to know why you have made changes to an article. Feel free to leave a message at my talk page if you have any questions about these issues or anything else. Regards. DH85868993 ( talk) 08:12, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. I have reverted the changes you made. Regarding your article, the concern is not so much the quality of the article (although some of the article appears to be a direct copy of another website, which is not allowed by Wikipedia's copyright policy), but the fact that the company is not sufficiently notable to warrant an article on Wikipedia. Regards. DH85868993 ( talk) 02:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC)