Guy like that are just the cost of doing business at Wikipedia. Once his talkpage fills up with enough warnings and blocks someone will take him to ANI. He'll get a second chance, then a mentor, then another chance, then some kind of voluntary sanctions, then a topic ban, and when he finally realizes he won't be able to push his POV he'll disappear. Going by his edit frequency, this process will take a couple months. Just be patient, always warn him on his talk when he's disruptive, and never never edit war with him. That only engenders sympathy for him.– Lionel ( talk) 07:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello ViriiK, Lionelt has given you a delicious Chick-Fil-A sammie, for for your commitment to a WP:UNDUE and WP:NPOV encyclopedia! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a delicious Chick-Fil-A sammie! Enjoy! |
NICE! I'll bet Pass a Method would like one of those. Belchfire- TALK 07:45, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
[sigh] What's the over/under on how many more times we'll see drive-by's try to plop the dog thing into the Romney articles without bothering to check the Talk archives? It's not like they have hot new information to share. And by the way, have you looked at any of the Obama articles lately? I was in Political positions of Barack Obama last night, and it's like a ghost town. Full of stuff from 2007-2010, but very little at all has been done to it since the election season started. It's almost like... like... he's not very popular any more. [shrug] Belchfire- TALK 23:27, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Could you please explain this edit, which reverted this one?
Before answering, you might want to refer to:
Wikipedia:User pages#Removal of comments, notices, and warnings
Wikipedia:User pages#Editing of other editors' user and user talk pages
Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Others' comments
Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments
--
Guy Macon (
talk)
08:11, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
... agrees. Arcandam ( talk) 06:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Hiya! I made a bold edit, I assumed you wouldn't mind. Arcandam ( talk) 09:03, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
I've noticed there's a dispute going on between User:101.161.38.174 and you on Template:Steve Jobs, which is on my watchlist. Personally, I support your reversion because I'm against adding pictures in navboxes, especially without discussion or consensus. It clutters up the template and is unnecessary for navigation. But I'm wondering if you can clue me in on the dispute? I've noticed similar edits by the IP on other templates.-- SGCM (talk) 07:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Please accept this
invite to join the
Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism. Simply click here to accept! – Lionel ( talk) 07:39, 3 August 2012 (UTC) |
Hey why don't you join project conservatism if Sir Lionel our grand Poobah offered you the invitation then you would be a great addition; only together through the project can we be successful in defending and propagating the truth throughout wikipedia not just on some articles. Please join it is really fun project to be a member of, look who the leader is, Sir Lionel, the defination of fun John D. Rockerduck ( talk) 03:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
That's a shame you would have made a great addition to the posse John D. Rockerduck ( talk) 04:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
I don't know if you're watching my user talk, but I've replied to your message there. Tide rolls 00:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
(accidently posted this to another editor) If the amount of vandalsim is bothering you I will support semi protection should you feel the need to request it. So sad that people take advantage of the opening to just be jerks.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 23:51, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For fighting liberal bias an a number of articles John D. Rockerduck ( talk) 04:42, 19 August 2012 (UTC) |
Might want to give more detail.... -- Avanu ( talk) 09:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Same opinion as anyone else. So, hope that helps. -- Avanu ( talk) 13:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
I would say it needs to be discussed in a manner that is open to scrutiny unless there is some overriding reason not to do so. -- Avanu ( talk) 05:08, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
ViriiK: I'm not sure what you are not understanding, but you have to provide a footnote that is RS and NPOV. Wikipedia pages (and the one you cited doesn't agree with your statement anyway) and the organization's own site don't meet the standards -- read a little about them if that's the confusion. It's an absolute requirement. If you do, then I'll go along with it. Otherwise, it has to be removed. guanxi ( talk) 05:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Okay, if you look at the schedule, the actual business of the convention is over by tuesday at six PM. Every single vote, whether or not it's actually contested is on Tuesday afternoon, and thus the convention is over. This is unprecedented. All the speeches, or rather most of them, are for the purpose of informing the delegates about the merits of the candidates before the convention's consideration. The Format goes back to the Days of Jackson and Van Buren. I want to make things in chronological order. So the Nomination goes first. Ericl ( talk) 02:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Silly Season Bumper Sticker |
You are one of the top contributors to 2012 Republican National Convention and it shows in the quality of the article. Keep up the great work! Here's a bumper sticker in recognition of your efforts. – Sir Lionel, EG( talk) 11:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC) |
Hi there. I merely wanted to paste the following material into the Romney 2012 Campaign article:
“ | According to The New York Times, when the Obama camp put material on television that "makes no effort to put any of Mr. Romney’s statements into context", the Romney campaign responded by saying that Obama was trying to distract Americans from real issues such as high unemployment. [1] | ” |
This was discussed at the article talk page, and no one objected. The reason why I created a temporary break is because I am on an iPhone, and therefore cannot paste material unless I am pasting it into a completely empty section; inserting a temporary break creates an empty section, then I paste the material, and then I remove the temporary break. No one has ever objected when I've done thus in the past. Perhaps you were unaware of the reason for it. I admire your editing, and did not mean to tick you off. May I go ahead with the edit? Cheers. 24.181.178.235 ( talk) 05:19, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm not in a hurry to revert you or anything because I don't have an opinion on the rest of the edit, but do you really think " Romney was restless for a company" is the best way to write that? "Restless" seems like a WP:Euphemism, it seems like that should be worded in a more precise way. - Sudo Ghost 02:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
You weren't specifically mentioned in the DRN, but you've had some input on the article so I thought it pertinent to inform you: [ [5]] Naapple ( Talk) 22:16, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. Thank you! The discussion concerns the Christian right. Psalm84 ( talk) 04:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
This is an ongoing problem where newspapers recite what Senate and House staffs tell them. This is an email exchange I had with Melissa Santos at The (Tacoma) News Tribune on Friday over this article [2]
Melissa Santos,
Sen. Maralyn Chase lives in Esperance, not Seattle as the print version of today's paper stated and not Shoreline, which the online version currently states. Esperance is an unincorporated enclave surrounded by the city of Edmonds. I get this information from the state voter rolls [3], which states, among other things, that she resides in the HOLLY precinct in Snohomish County, found here [4]. It'd be reasonable to cite her as being from Edmonds in the newspaper, given that's the city used on her voting address and most people aren't aware of the names of unincorporated census-designated places, but its misleading to cite her as being "from Seattle" or being a "Shoreline Democrat" given she doesn't even live in King County.
Her Reply:
Thanks for the note.
Your point on her not being from Shoreline is well taken. We have this issue with several legislators because it is hard to say "unincorporated Snohomish County" or "unincorporated Thurston County" and have people know where we are talking about.
The stuff we get from the Senate Dems always says she's from Shoreline too. Anyway, I will talk to my colleagues about whether we or not we should start saying she's from Esperance.
Thanks,
Melissa
Also, you're changing correct information to incorrect information when it doesn't even match what the politicians cite. Jay Rodne cites his residence as being North Bend on his official House website
[5], not Issaquah as you changed it to. North Bend is a city by the way, not a CDP. Also, Seattle politicians do cite their residence by neighborhood, like Bob Hasegawa
[6], Eileen Cody
[7], and Frank Chopp
[8]. Also, its untrue to state that politicians don't state their residence as being a CDP, because Tim Sheldon and Brandon Vick
[9] (which you changed his residence from Felida to Vancouver) do.
I'm interested in accuracy, not what the staffs of politicians say. My own State Senator, Tracey Eide, lists her residence on her official Senate website as Federal Way [10], despite her residence being in the Redondo neighborhood of Des Moines in precinct: Des Moines 30-0954. If you want to accurately list someone's residence, order a copy of the voter rolls [11]. It'll only cost you $7 - though its free for just King County - and you'll know the name, DOB, voting address, mailing address, precinct, and voting frequency of every voter in the state of Washington - including elected officials. Champ68 ( talk) 15:12, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Sigh. So I guess someone has to put a lot of unnecessary effort into thwarting your quest for inaccuracy. If I were to put the date of birth on every state legislator, then you can use their name and DOB to freely accessing their voting address and precinct info (
WA SoS MyVote). Does that satisfy your original research complaint? Or are you going to change it back to what some lazy or overstretched reporter put in a newspaper? Okay, so the PI says Rodney Tom lives in Medina (
link), but then you change it back to Bellevue - as you just did on the Majority Coalition Caucus wiki page - because the Seattle Times cites him as being from there (
link). What are we to do? If only there were some reliable source to find out where people actually live, not just where their staff says they're from. I guess using the Washington Secretary of State's website for "Rodney Tom" born on "July 25, 1963"
[12] that shows him as living in the Medina 48-0750 precinct wouldn't be a good resource, would it? I guess we should ignore that information, even though occasionally newspapers, such as the Seattle Times
[13], will run corrections after they blindly parrot what some politician or their staffer feeds them. And its hardly just Rodney Tom.
I noticed you reverted my edit. As Nepali language and Bengali language as they are official through out Darjeeling district and Siliguri falls there. The local language tags should be added. Why reverted? BijoyChakrabarty ✉ 07:06, 6 July 2013 ( BST)/06:36, 6 July 2013 ( IST)
Hi....I wasn't trying to brush you off at all. My impression is that MilesMoney is a ban evader and is indeed Stillstanding-247. I also was being facetious about the whole cloud thing...it's a bogus argument that some conservative cloud is out to get him when folks like myself aren't even interested in political articles that much. Best wishes.-- MONGO 18:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Awww, MilesMoney didn't want to answer my question.
Let me know Miles. Am I one of the sockpuppets that you suspect of being someone else? I whole heartily endorse a SPI against me. Would you against yourself? If not, why not? ViriiK ( talk) 00:39, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
I sincerely hope against hope that MilesMoney has the sense not to respond to you ViriiK. As an observer here, I'd say your behavior has more of the signs to indicate you are an off-wiki meatpuppet recruit who's drunk the drink. SPECIFICO talk 00:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, ViriiK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hey! Hit me up on Twitter so we can discuss this. Just get rid of the "The" and you'll find me. I've been in contact with Chris Loesch over this. (Please delete this afterwards)
Guy like that are just the cost of doing business at Wikipedia. Once his talkpage fills up with enough warnings and blocks someone will take him to ANI. He'll get a second chance, then a mentor, then another chance, then some kind of voluntary sanctions, then a topic ban, and when he finally realizes he won't be able to push his POV he'll disappear. Going by his edit frequency, this process will take a couple months. Just be patient, always warn him on his talk when he's disruptive, and never never edit war with him. That only engenders sympathy for him.– Lionel ( talk) 07:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello ViriiK, Lionelt has given you a delicious Chick-Fil-A sammie, for for your commitment to a WP:UNDUE and WP:NPOV encyclopedia! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a delicious Chick-Fil-A sammie! Enjoy! |
NICE! I'll bet Pass a Method would like one of those. Belchfire- TALK 07:45, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
[sigh] What's the over/under on how many more times we'll see drive-by's try to plop the dog thing into the Romney articles without bothering to check the Talk archives? It's not like they have hot new information to share. And by the way, have you looked at any of the Obama articles lately? I was in Political positions of Barack Obama last night, and it's like a ghost town. Full of stuff from 2007-2010, but very little at all has been done to it since the election season started. It's almost like... like... he's not very popular any more. [shrug] Belchfire- TALK 23:27, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Could you please explain this edit, which reverted this one?
Before answering, you might want to refer to:
Wikipedia:User pages#Removal of comments, notices, and warnings
Wikipedia:User pages#Editing of other editors' user and user talk pages
Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Others' comments
Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments
--
Guy Macon (
talk)
08:11, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
... agrees. Arcandam ( talk) 06:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Hiya! I made a bold edit, I assumed you wouldn't mind. Arcandam ( talk) 09:03, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
I've noticed there's a dispute going on between User:101.161.38.174 and you on Template:Steve Jobs, which is on my watchlist. Personally, I support your reversion because I'm against adding pictures in navboxes, especially without discussion or consensus. It clutters up the template and is unnecessary for navigation. But I'm wondering if you can clue me in on the dispute? I've noticed similar edits by the IP on other templates.-- SGCM (talk) 07:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Please accept this
invite to join the
Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism. Simply click here to accept! – Lionel ( talk) 07:39, 3 August 2012 (UTC) |
Hey why don't you join project conservatism if Sir Lionel our grand Poobah offered you the invitation then you would be a great addition; only together through the project can we be successful in defending and propagating the truth throughout wikipedia not just on some articles. Please join it is really fun project to be a member of, look who the leader is, Sir Lionel, the defination of fun John D. Rockerduck ( talk) 03:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
That's a shame you would have made a great addition to the posse John D. Rockerduck ( talk) 04:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
I don't know if you're watching my user talk, but I've replied to your message there. Tide rolls 00:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
(accidently posted this to another editor) If the amount of vandalsim is bothering you I will support semi protection should you feel the need to request it. So sad that people take advantage of the opening to just be jerks.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 23:51, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For fighting liberal bias an a number of articles John D. Rockerduck ( talk) 04:42, 19 August 2012 (UTC) |
Might want to give more detail.... -- Avanu ( talk) 09:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Same opinion as anyone else. So, hope that helps. -- Avanu ( talk) 13:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
I would say it needs to be discussed in a manner that is open to scrutiny unless there is some overriding reason not to do so. -- Avanu ( talk) 05:08, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
ViriiK: I'm not sure what you are not understanding, but you have to provide a footnote that is RS and NPOV. Wikipedia pages (and the one you cited doesn't agree with your statement anyway) and the organization's own site don't meet the standards -- read a little about them if that's the confusion. It's an absolute requirement. If you do, then I'll go along with it. Otherwise, it has to be removed. guanxi ( talk) 05:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Okay, if you look at the schedule, the actual business of the convention is over by tuesday at six PM. Every single vote, whether or not it's actually contested is on Tuesday afternoon, and thus the convention is over. This is unprecedented. All the speeches, or rather most of them, are for the purpose of informing the delegates about the merits of the candidates before the convention's consideration. The Format goes back to the Days of Jackson and Van Buren. I want to make things in chronological order. So the Nomination goes first. Ericl ( talk) 02:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Silly Season Bumper Sticker |
You are one of the top contributors to 2012 Republican National Convention and it shows in the quality of the article. Keep up the great work! Here's a bumper sticker in recognition of your efforts. – Sir Lionel, EG( talk) 11:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC) |
Hi there. I merely wanted to paste the following material into the Romney 2012 Campaign article:
“ | According to The New York Times, when the Obama camp put material on television that "makes no effort to put any of Mr. Romney’s statements into context", the Romney campaign responded by saying that Obama was trying to distract Americans from real issues such as high unemployment. [1] | ” |
This was discussed at the article talk page, and no one objected. The reason why I created a temporary break is because I am on an iPhone, and therefore cannot paste material unless I am pasting it into a completely empty section; inserting a temporary break creates an empty section, then I paste the material, and then I remove the temporary break. No one has ever objected when I've done thus in the past. Perhaps you were unaware of the reason for it. I admire your editing, and did not mean to tick you off. May I go ahead with the edit? Cheers. 24.181.178.235 ( talk) 05:19, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm not in a hurry to revert you or anything because I don't have an opinion on the rest of the edit, but do you really think " Romney was restless for a company" is the best way to write that? "Restless" seems like a WP:Euphemism, it seems like that should be worded in a more precise way. - Sudo Ghost 02:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
You weren't specifically mentioned in the DRN, but you've had some input on the article so I thought it pertinent to inform you: [ [5]] Naapple ( Talk) 22:16, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. Thank you! The discussion concerns the Christian right. Psalm84 ( talk) 04:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
This is an ongoing problem where newspapers recite what Senate and House staffs tell them. This is an email exchange I had with Melissa Santos at The (Tacoma) News Tribune on Friday over this article [2]
Melissa Santos,
Sen. Maralyn Chase lives in Esperance, not Seattle as the print version of today's paper stated and not Shoreline, which the online version currently states. Esperance is an unincorporated enclave surrounded by the city of Edmonds. I get this information from the state voter rolls [3], which states, among other things, that she resides in the HOLLY precinct in Snohomish County, found here [4]. It'd be reasonable to cite her as being from Edmonds in the newspaper, given that's the city used on her voting address and most people aren't aware of the names of unincorporated census-designated places, but its misleading to cite her as being "from Seattle" or being a "Shoreline Democrat" given she doesn't even live in King County.
Her Reply:
Thanks for the note.
Your point on her not being from Shoreline is well taken. We have this issue with several legislators because it is hard to say "unincorporated Snohomish County" or "unincorporated Thurston County" and have people know where we are talking about.
The stuff we get from the Senate Dems always says she's from Shoreline too. Anyway, I will talk to my colleagues about whether we or not we should start saying she's from Esperance.
Thanks,
Melissa
Also, you're changing correct information to incorrect information when it doesn't even match what the politicians cite. Jay Rodne cites his residence as being North Bend on his official House website
[5], not Issaquah as you changed it to. North Bend is a city by the way, not a CDP. Also, Seattle politicians do cite their residence by neighborhood, like Bob Hasegawa
[6], Eileen Cody
[7], and Frank Chopp
[8]. Also, its untrue to state that politicians don't state their residence as being a CDP, because Tim Sheldon and Brandon Vick
[9] (which you changed his residence from Felida to Vancouver) do.
I'm interested in accuracy, not what the staffs of politicians say. My own State Senator, Tracey Eide, lists her residence on her official Senate website as Federal Way [10], despite her residence being in the Redondo neighborhood of Des Moines in precinct: Des Moines 30-0954. If you want to accurately list someone's residence, order a copy of the voter rolls [11]. It'll only cost you $7 - though its free for just King County - and you'll know the name, DOB, voting address, mailing address, precinct, and voting frequency of every voter in the state of Washington - including elected officials. Champ68 ( talk) 15:12, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Sigh. So I guess someone has to put a lot of unnecessary effort into thwarting your quest for inaccuracy. If I were to put the date of birth on every state legislator, then you can use their name and DOB to freely accessing their voting address and precinct info (
WA SoS MyVote). Does that satisfy your original research complaint? Or are you going to change it back to what some lazy or overstretched reporter put in a newspaper? Okay, so the PI says Rodney Tom lives in Medina (
link), but then you change it back to Bellevue - as you just did on the Majority Coalition Caucus wiki page - because the Seattle Times cites him as being from there (
link). What are we to do? If only there were some reliable source to find out where people actually live, not just where their staff says they're from. I guess using the Washington Secretary of State's website for "Rodney Tom" born on "July 25, 1963"
[12] that shows him as living in the Medina 48-0750 precinct wouldn't be a good resource, would it? I guess we should ignore that information, even though occasionally newspapers, such as the Seattle Times
[13], will run corrections after they blindly parrot what some politician or their staffer feeds them. And its hardly just Rodney Tom.
I noticed you reverted my edit. As Nepali language and Bengali language as they are official through out Darjeeling district and Siliguri falls there. The local language tags should be added. Why reverted? BijoyChakrabarty ✉ 07:06, 6 July 2013 ( BST)/06:36, 6 July 2013 ( IST)
Hi....I wasn't trying to brush you off at all. My impression is that MilesMoney is a ban evader and is indeed Stillstanding-247. I also was being facetious about the whole cloud thing...it's a bogus argument that some conservative cloud is out to get him when folks like myself aren't even interested in political articles that much. Best wishes.-- MONGO 18:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Awww, MilesMoney didn't want to answer my question.
Let me know Miles. Am I one of the sockpuppets that you suspect of being someone else? I whole heartily endorse a SPI against me. Would you against yourself? If not, why not? ViriiK ( talk) 00:39, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
I sincerely hope against hope that MilesMoney has the sense not to respond to you ViriiK. As an observer here, I'd say your behavior has more of the signs to indicate you are an off-wiki meatpuppet recruit who's drunk the drink. SPECIFICO talk 00:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, ViriiK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hey! Hit me up on Twitter so we can discuss this. Just get rid of the "The" and you'll find me. I've been in contact with Chris Loesch over this. (Please delete this afterwards)