![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for your contribution and invitation on my user page. Can I apply to you for comment and advice on a vital point of Wikipedia policy? ChalSeismo ( talk) 15:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. It is WP:NOR/Noticeboard, item 9. It is pretty long? and I am not at all sure if you are interested in the topic. Still, the issue for policy (NOR or rather what is not NOR) must be interesting to anybody writing in the Wikipedia. The long text after I was told by Blueboar to show that my case is not one like the flat-earth hypothesis was just to show that it was not. It need no detain you. But read my first input, will you? ChalSeismo ( talk) 13:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
It's all right. Thanks all the same ChalSeismo ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 06:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Byzantine–Venetian treaty of 1277 on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply to my request about the mentioned page. I haven't written anything on the said article as I haven't succeeded in finding sources and citations that are online. Although I have new information and I am not sure how to put them on the article as it keeps getting edited. I do know Vedika Thorat and the reason why you found the changes the same is that I haven't edited anything from any editor (You can check in the history). But I saw what is happening and thought it would be best to seek help from the administrator board. As the edit war continues I am spending more time on my talk page rather than research. I am getting new information but too worried to do anything because I keep getting backlash, spiteful language, and warnings. Please check my wikipedia. As I said I am new to Wikipedia. I would really appreciate your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahesh Karve ( talk • contribs) 06:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Sure thing! I do understand that why you would observe my behavior too. My question is I didn't write anything, all I did was reinstate one section of one article that was completely wiped out. How can that be disruptive? Also, I got a warning when I was discussing this with the fellow editor. It was a very quick thing, the one who gave me the warning didn't even discuss or talked to me he simply issued a warning (When I wasn't even editing, I was just talking because I realized there is some issue.). This way anyone can issue 3 warnings and get someone blocked from editing. I do not wish to be biased. I will get my content checked before editing anything but someone needs to do something because this page is becoming field ground for political ideologies. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mahesh Karve (
talk •
contribs)
07:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Yes. Thank you! Mahesh Karve ( talk) 10:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Mahesh Karve
Hello,
First of all I am here to inform you that "Angelica di Silvestri" is a paid contributor means she paid to "Wiki on sky"
Please make the template for paid contributor.
The claims on this page are not reliable and sources are totally wrong. I can send you some official statement against this written by the Italian police. I can send you an attachment but i didn't know how to send it to you Wiki on Sky ( talk) 07:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Can you please add the template of paid contributor on Angelica di Silvestri page. But it is the statement by Italian police. If it isn't valid to prove that the information is wrong, so please give me some time so I will be back with some news report regarding it. Thank you Wiki on Sky ( talk) 07:31, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Read WP:ASPERSIONS and don't ever resort to cheap shots like this. You have no evidence of me getting canvassed and any more such misleading tagging will be reported accordingly. Shankargb ( talk) 04:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
@ Shankargb: Sure, feel free to report whatever you want. on your talk page I count at least five sections with warnings related to disruptive editing and two DS alerts in under one year. So go ahead and report me :-) I expressed my concern on the appropriate forum. Vikram Vincent 05:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Just for the record, my doubts about canvassing are not unsubstantiated considering https://mobile.twitter.com/deepdhan555/status/1361760523465887744
![]() |
Thank you for your invaluable contributions, they are very much appreciated. Beccaynr ( talk) 01:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC) |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for your contribution and invitation on my user page. Can I apply to you for comment and advice on a vital point of Wikipedia policy? ChalSeismo ( talk) 15:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. It is WP:NOR/Noticeboard, item 9. It is pretty long? and I am not at all sure if you are interested in the topic. Still, the issue for policy (NOR or rather what is not NOR) must be interesting to anybody writing in the Wikipedia. The long text after I was told by Blueboar to show that my case is not one like the flat-earth hypothesis was just to show that it was not. It need no detain you. But read my first input, will you? ChalSeismo ( talk) 13:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
It's all right. Thanks all the same ChalSeismo ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 06:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Byzantine–Venetian treaty of 1277 on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply to my request about the mentioned page. I haven't written anything on the said article as I haven't succeeded in finding sources and citations that are online. Although I have new information and I am not sure how to put them on the article as it keeps getting edited. I do know Vedika Thorat and the reason why you found the changes the same is that I haven't edited anything from any editor (You can check in the history). But I saw what is happening and thought it would be best to seek help from the administrator board. As the edit war continues I am spending more time on my talk page rather than research. I am getting new information but too worried to do anything because I keep getting backlash, spiteful language, and warnings. Please check my wikipedia. As I said I am new to Wikipedia. I would really appreciate your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahesh Karve ( talk • contribs) 06:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Sure thing! I do understand that why you would observe my behavior too. My question is I didn't write anything, all I did was reinstate one section of one article that was completely wiped out. How can that be disruptive? Also, I got a warning when I was discussing this with the fellow editor. It was a very quick thing, the one who gave me the warning didn't even discuss or talked to me he simply issued a warning (When I wasn't even editing, I was just talking because I realized there is some issue.). This way anyone can issue 3 warnings and get someone blocked from editing. I do not wish to be biased. I will get my content checked before editing anything but someone needs to do something because this page is becoming field ground for political ideologies. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mahesh Karve (
talk •
contribs)
07:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Yes. Thank you! Mahesh Karve ( talk) 10:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Mahesh Karve
Hello,
First of all I am here to inform you that "Angelica di Silvestri" is a paid contributor means she paid to "Wiki on sky"
Please make the template for paid contributor.
The claims on this page are not reliable and sources are totally wrong. I can send you some official statement against this written by the Italian police. I can send you an attachment but i didn't know how to send it to you Wiki on Sky ( talk) 07:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Can you please add the template of paid contributor on Angelica di Silvestri page. But it is the statement by Italian police. If it isn't valid to prove that the information is wrong, so please give me some time so I will be back with some news report regarding it. Thank you Wiki on Sky ( talk) 07:31, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Read WP:ASPERSIONS and don't ever resort to cheap shots like this. You have no evidence of me getting canvassed and any more such misleading tagging will be reported accordingly. Shankargb ( talk) 04:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
@ Shankargb: Sure, feel free to report whatever you want. on your talk page I count at least five sections with warnings related to disruptive editing and two DS alerts in under one year. So go ahead and report me :-) I expressed my concern on the appropriate forum. Vikram Vincent 05:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Just for the record, my doubts about canvassing are not unsubstantiated considering https://mobile.twitter.com/deepdhan555/status/1361760523465887744
![]() |
Thank you for your invaluable contributions, they are very much appreciated. Beccaynr ( talk) 01:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC) |