|
Versability, this is not personal, but merely an attempt to abide by Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, and eradicate self-promotion, such as the inclusion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Penny a page that you created. This warrants Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spatuletail ( talk • contribs) 18:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Absolutely agree this needs conflict resolution. It's not personal at all. You attempted to remove neutral information that was clearly and well cited simply because it didn't agree with Assurant's PR line. This is unacceptable and against Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. I welcome the dispute resolution process. Versability ( talk) 18:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Once again Versability: You have a
conflict of interest. In order to abide by Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, contributing information that constitutes a conflict of interest is not in Wikipedia's best interest.
You consistently
Versability: If you are affiliated with some of the people
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In order to abide by Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, contributing information that may constitute a conflict of interest are not in Wikipedia's best interest. If you have a conflict of interest regarding an edit that you are making, plese exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view and verifiability of information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spatuletail ( talk • contribs) 18:32, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
The article Brian Penny has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Interior (Talk) 00:55, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove
Biographies of Living Persons prods from an article unless it contains at least one
reliable source or was created before 18 March 2010, as you did with
Brian Penny. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider sourcing the article or
commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you.
The Interior
(Talk)
01:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Penny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Penny until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Interior (Talk) 01:46, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Versability. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Clovis Sangrail ( talk) 05:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
ugh...ok, I see what you're saying now...I'll try again later when it's better documented... thanks and sorry! Versability ( talk) 03:43, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
haha, I gotcha...it's all good...got a couple things in the works...I'll be back... ;) Versability ( talk) 05:11, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Well thanks! Welcome to Wikipedia!
Agent 78787 talk contribs 02:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Please look at the edit summary by the editor who removed it..... see WP:ES for where to find the edit summary.
Ariconte ( talk) 01:57, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Brian Penny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crowsnest ( talk) 12:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Penny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Penny (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crowsnest ( talk) 20:54, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
And that is how Wikipedia is supposed to work; by concsensus :).
Lectonar ( talk) 07:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
This is an automated message. Your
editor review is scheduled to be closed on 8 September 2013 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive-->
to the review page will prevent further automated actions.
AnomieBOT
⚡
21:59, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Brian_Penny. JohnCD ( talk) 10:21, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike | Talk 15:41, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
|
Versability, this is not personal, but merely an attempt to abide by Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, and eradicate self-promotion, such as the inclusion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Penny a page that you created. This warrants Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spatuletail ( talk • contribs) 18:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Absolutely agree this needs conflict resolution. It's not personal at all. You attempted to remove neutral information that was clearly and well cited simply because it didn't agree with Assurant's PR line. This is unacceptable and against Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. I welcome the dispute resolution process. Versability ( talk) 18:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Once again Versability: You have a
conflict of interest. In order to abide by Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, contributing information that constitutes a conflict of interest is not in Wikipedia's best interest.
You consistently
Versability: If you are affiliated with some of the people
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In order to abide by Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, contributing information that may constitute a conflict of interest are not in Wikipedia's best interest. If you have a conflict of interest regarding an edit that you are making, plese exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view and verifiability of information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spatuletail ( talk • contribs) 18:32, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
The article Brian Penny has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Interior (Talk) 00:55, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove
Biographies of Living Persons prods from an article unless it contains at least one
reliable source or was created before 18 March 2010, as you did with
Brian Penny. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider sourcing the article or
commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you.
The Interior
(Talk)
01:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Penny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Penny until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Interior (Talk) 01:46, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Versability. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Clovis Sangrail ( talk) 05:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
ugh...ok, I see what you're saying now...I'll try again later when it's better documented... thanks and sorry! Versability ( talk) 03:43, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
haha, I gotcha...it's all good...got a couple things in the works...I'll be back... ;) Versability ( talk) 05:11, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Well thanks! Welcome to Wikipedia!
Agent 78787 talk contribs 02:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Please look at the edit summary by the editor who removed it..... see WP:ES for where to find the edit summary.
Ariconte ( talk) 01:57, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Brian Penny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crowsnest ( talk) 12:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Penny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Penny (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crowsnest ( talk) 20:54, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
And that is how Wikipedia is supposed to work; by concsensus :).
Lectonar ( talk) 07:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
This is an automated message. Your
editor review is scheduled to be closed on 8 September 2013 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive-->
to the review page will prevent further automated actions.
AnomieBOT
⚡
21:59, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Brian_Penny. JohnCD ( talk) 10:21, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike | Talk 15:41, 6 September 2013 (UTC)