Hey, i've noticed you reverted my Edits on the Page: Finns, please, i ask you to not revert my Edits on that Page, you may think it's not, but, those Informations are Crucial for enrich the Content of that Page, some People don't even know Finland is a Bilingual country, and those Informations would be Useful for someone to Travel to or Work in the Country, even why everybody knows if you'd Work in another country, it's crucial for you to Know to speak the languages spoken in that Country, even if the country is a multilingual country, such as Canada, for Example, you'd have to Learn all the Official languages of that Country, for Example, if you Travel to Switzerland, you'd have to Learn even less spoken languages in the Country, such as Italian or Romansh, for Example, not to mention that's Crucial for someone to understand the Finnish culture, travel there and even work in the country, even because there are people who may not know much of the country and go there to travel or work, and everyone knows that if you go to another country for whatever reason , you need to know to speak the language that is spoken in there, even if it is a multilingual country such as Switzerland, Ireland, Finland and Canada, you need to learn all the official languages that are spoken in the country, Best regards, WhiteGuy1850 — Preceding unsigned comment added by WhiteGuy1850 ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 14 January 2018 (UTC) If you continue to revert my Edits to Finns, i'd have to ask for Admins to Block you — Preceding unsigned comment added by WhiteGuy1850 ( talk • contribs) 17:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kvenland. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. A map based on a map with a guesstimate of where "Quaenland" was and a map showing more recent expansion of Finns, combined to make it look as if the two belong together, is original research/ synthesis of sources. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 15:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
"The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material"(my emphasis). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 15:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Kvenland, you may be blocked from editing. It is up to you to provide sources, since you're adding material (see WP:BURDEN), not me. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 15:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Kvenland. What part of "original research/synthesis of sources: combining data from different time periods and presenting it as if the two belong together" was it that you didn't understand? - Tom | Thomas.W talk 15:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
"Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources", again my emphasis; which disallows the map since it implies that Finns lived around the northern part of the Gulf of Bothnia in 814AD, the year given in the map the name comes from). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 16:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Since Finland is bilingual terms should be in Finnish and Swedish. -- Per W ( talk) 15:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
You're being a little immature, Have you noticed that all the nations that live in multilingual countries, such as the Belgians, for example, have all the languages spoken in the country where they live in the language section spoken by the people themselves except the Finns ? WhiteGuy1850 ( talk) 17:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Pls stop edit warring, you are deliberate confusing two separate issues, the section titled Ethnonym is about how Slavs got their name, read the first sentence, "The Slavic autonym is reconstructed in Proto-Slavic as *Slověninъ, plural *Slověne." not about how the word Slavery came about in the west. I will request that you are blocked because you are inserting content clearly not related to the section. -- E-960 ( talk) 16:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Slavs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Hello, Velivieras. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to
Finland has been reverted or removed, because it contains
speculative or unconfirmed information.
Please only add material about future events if it is
verifiable, based on a
reliable source. ‑ ‑
Gareth Griffith‑Jones
The Welsh Buzzard ‑ ‑ 10:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Finnish tribes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Finnish ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Velivieras. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Just so we don't have to go through this again: the Latin name Tavastia, which was first documented in 1303 AD, is derived from the Old Norse name Tafæistaland (which was first documented ~300 years before the first appearance of the Latin name, and long before the Swedish crusades...), where TafæistR is a Scandinavian personal name. A name that then became Tafvastland/Tavastland when Old Norse split into Swedish, Danish and Norwegian. See "Fibula, Fabula, Fact: The Viking Age in Finland", pages 416-421. Cheers, - Tom | Thomas.W talk 19:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
"The name Tavastland is no borrowing at all but together with the name Finland it testifies to continuing Scandinavian–Finnish contact throughout the Late Iron Age", i.e. that "Tavastland" is a Scandinavian name, not borrowed from anywhere... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 19:49, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Velivieras,
Thank you for creating Treasure of Halikko.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thanks for creating this article
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Abishe ( talk) 01:37, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, What is your justification for deleting excerpt from the most recent and prestigious Northern Crusades academic research? I do not see anything in the wiki article contradicting that research, but if I am wrong, please take time to edit the wiki to accommodate the facts instead of deleting facts to accommodate the wiki. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.192.49.151 ( talk) 03:51, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm WikiHannibal. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2017 Turku attack, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WikiHannibal ( talk) 07:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Velivieras,
It has come to my knowledge that you have reverted some of the edits I have made into the article Espoo, particularly concerning extracts in the introduction and the history section.
To begin with, everything I have written can be found in the given sources, if you look through them. And contrary to what you claimed—yes, it is known when the Swedish first migrated to present-day Espoo. All the sources, including the one that was cited, indicate that this most likely did happen during the 13th century.
The introduction of the article should be short and informative, also to those, who are unfamiliar with Finnish history. This is the very reason why I added short clarification to Sweden ceding Finland to the Russian Empire, et cetera. So, I need to beg you to forgive me if I have made edits that have altered your preferred version of the article. However, the part about Finnic people living in Espoo is quite irrelevant to the history-at-large, for it was, indeed, the Swedish, not the Finns, who established Espoo as a parish sometime in the 15th century. Besides, it is already quite evident people were living there before the colonization because it is explicitly stated in the previous sentence. Also, times before the 13th century are not considered to be a part of the Medieval Period in Finland, even though it is so in the rest of Europe.
Furthermore, I have noticed you deleted a short inclusion about connections to the east in the history section, whose purpose was to make the text more coherent, and I have to admit I can't quite follow your train of thought there. If the archaeological evidence shows that there were Savono-Karelian artefacts in Espoo during the era, it obviously means there was some kind of connection to the east (these artefacts didn't just pop out of the earth, so to say). Could you explain the motivation behind this edit?
Lastly, concerning English grammar—punctuation, namely—I would kindly ask to stop reverting my revisions to the text body. It is absolutely vital that all articles in the English Wikipedia should follow correct orthography, and I see no reason for your altering grammatically correct sentences into ones that aren't. Again, I have no interest in engaging myself in an edit war with another member of the Wikimedia Community, and I truly appreciate your efforts in making the article better.
With kind regards, Kalapulla123 ( talk) 19:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
The numbers you gave for people with foreign background seem to be vastly inflated. This SCB table gives the number as 2,752,572. Could you explain where you found the number 3,557,912? Sjö ( talk) 12:11, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey, i've noticed you reverted my Edits on the Page: Finns, please, i ask you to not revert my Edits on that Page, you may think it's not, but, those Informations are Crucial for enrich the Content of that Page, some People don't even know Finland is a Bilingual country, and those Informations would be Useful for someone to Travel to or Work in the Country, even why everybody knows if you'd Work in another country, it's crucial for you to Know to speak the languages spoken in that Country, even if the country is a multilingual country, such as Canada, for Example, you'd have to Learn all the Official languages of that Country, for Example, if you Travel to Switzerland, you'd have to Learn even less spoken languages in the Country, such as Italian or Romansh, for Example, not to mention that's Crucial for someone to understand the Finnish culture, travel there and even work in the country, even because there are people who may not know much of the country and go there to travel or work, and everyone knows that if you go to another country for whatever reason , you need to know to speak the language that is spoken in there, even if it is a multilingual country such as Switzerland, Ireland, Finland and Canada, you need to learn all the official languages that are spoken in the country, Best regards, WhiteGuy1850 — Preceding unsigned comment added by WhiteGuy1850 ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 14 January 2018 (UTC) If you continue to revert my Edits to Finns, i'd have to ask for Admins to Block you — Preceding unsigned comment added by WhiteGuy1850 ( talk • contribs) 17:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kvenland. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. A map based on a map with a guesstimate of where "Quaenland" was and a map showing more recent expansion of Finns, combined to make it look as if the two belong together, is original research/ synthesis of sources. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 15:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
"The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material"(my emphasis). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 15:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Kvenland, you may be blocked from editing. It is up to you to provide sources, since you're adding material (see WP:BURDEN), not me. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 15:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Kvenland. What part of "original research/synthesis of sources: combining data from different time periods and presenting it as if the two belong together" was it that you didn't understand? - Tom | Thomas.W talk 15:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
"Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources", again my emphasis; which disallows the map since it implies that Finns lived around the northern part of the Gulf of Bothnia in 814AD, the year given in the map the name comes from). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 16:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Since Finland is bilingual terms should be in Finnish and Swedish. -- Per W ( talk) 15:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
You're being a little immature, Have you noticed that all the nations that live in multilingual countries, such as the Belgians, for example, have all the languages spoken in the country where they live in the language section spoken by the people themselves except the Finns ? WhiteGuy1850 ( talk) 17:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Pls stop edit warring, you are deliberate confusing two separate issues, the section titled Ethnonym is about how Slavs got their name, read the first sentence, "The Slavic autonym is reconstructed in Proto-Slavic as *Slověninъ, plural *Slověne." not about how the word Slavery came about in the west. I will request that you are blocked because you are inserting content clearly not related to the section. -- E-960 ( talk) 16:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Slavs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Hello, Velivieras. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to
Finland has been reverted or removed, because it contains
speculative or unconfirmed information.
Please only add material about future events if it is
verifiable, based on a
reliable source. ‑ ‑
Gareth Griffith‑Jones
The Welsh Buzzard ‑ ‑ 10:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Finnish tribes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Finnish ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Velivieras. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Just so we don't have to go through this again: the Latin name Tavastia, which was first documented in 1303 AD, is derived from the Old Norse name Tafæistaland (which was first documented ~300 years before the first appearance of the Latin name, and long before the Swedish crusades...), where TafæistR is a Scandinavian personal name. A name that then became Tafvastland/Tavastland when Old Norse split into Swedish, Danish and Norwegian. See "Fibula, Fabula, Fact: The Viking Age in Finland", pages 416-421. Cheers, - Tom | Thomas.W talk 19:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
"The name Tavastland is no borrowing at all but together with the name Finland it testifies to continuing Scandinavian–Finnish contact throughout the Late Iron Age", i.e. that "Tavastland" is a Scandinavian name, not borrowed from anywhere... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 19:49, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Velivieras,
Thank you for creating Treasure of Halikko.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thanks for creating this article
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Abishe ( talk) 01:37, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, What is your justification for deleting excerpt from the most recent and prestigious Northern Crusades academic research? I do not see anything in the wiki article contradicting that research, but if I am wrong, please take time to edit the wiki to accommodate the facts instead of deleting facts to accommodate the wiki. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.192.49.151 ( talk) 03:51, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm WikiHannibal. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2017 Turku attack, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WikiHannibal ( talk) 07:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Velivieras,
It has come to my knowledge that you have reverted some of the edits I have made into the article Espoo, particularly concerning extracts in the introduction and the history section.
To begin with, everything I have written can be found in the given sources, if you look through them. And contrary to what you claimed—yes, it is known when the Swedish first migrated to present-day Espoo. All the sources, including the one that was cited, indicate that this most likely did happen during the 13th century.
The introduction of the article should be short and informative, also to those, who are unfamiliar with Finnish history. This is the very reason why I added short clarification to Sweden ceding Finland to the Russian Empire, et cetera. So, I need to beg you to forgive me if I have made edits that have altered your preferred version of the article. However, the part about Finnic people living in Espoo is quite irrelevant to the history-at-large, for it was, indeed, the Swedish, not the Finns, who established Espoo as a parish sometime in the 15th century. Besides, it is already quite evident people were living there before the colonization because it is explicitly stated in the previous sentence. Also, times before the 13th century are not considered to be a part of the Medieval Period in Finland, even though it is so in the rest of Europe.
Furthermore, I have noticed you deleted a short inclusion about connections to the east in the history section, whose purpose was to make the text more coherent, and I have to admit I can't quite follow your train of thought there. If the archaeological evidence shows that there were Savono-Karelian artefacts in Espoo during the era, it obviously means there was some kind of connection to the east (these artefacts didn't just pop out of the earth, so to say). Could you explain the motivation behind this edit?
Lastly, concerning English grammar—punctuation, namely—I would kindly ask to stop reverting my revisions to the text body. It is absolutely vital that all articles in the English Wikipedia should follow correct orthography, and I see no reason for your altering grammatically correct sentences into ones that aren't. Again, I have no interest in engaging myself in an edit war with another member of the Wikimedia Community, and I truly appreciate your efforts in making the article better.
With kind regards, Kalapulla123 ( talk) 19:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
The numbers you gave for people with foreign background seem to be vastly inflated. This SCB table gives the number as 2,752,572. Could you explain where you found the number 3,557,912? Sjö ( talk) 12:11, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)