From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ref edits related to kallar by sitush and mathewvanitas. they are constantly rejecting well referenced contents and pushing their veiws fiercly. there seems to b personal agenda. no one should be allowed to impose on others in this way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweapstalker ( talkcontribs) 16:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Edits at Kallar (caste)

Greetings, your edits at Kallar (caste) have been reverted since you did not provide any reference verifying the accuracy of the information. I'm sure you will agree that it is vitally important that the article remain credible and verifiable, so we must work together to maintain a high standard of evidence. I suggest readying WP:verifiability to understand how best to support the data in the article and any new additions, as well as WP:Footnotes for any technical information on adding footnotes. Feel free to contact me on my Talk page if you have any questions. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 17:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, Veenay.bl. You have new messages at Talk:Kallar_(caste)#Suggested_topics_for_expansion.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MatthewVanitas ( talk) 20:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Please use accurate Edit Summaries

Note that removing an entire cited sentence does not count as "Spelling and Typos". I would exercise more caution, particularly since that sentence could be seen as controversial, so removing it without explanation could be interpreted as showing bias, and not mentioning it in the Edit Summary could be seen as dishonestly trying to hide a biased edit. I hope that's not the case, but I would be very careful about clearly explaining your edits in your Summaries each time you save. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 16:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ref edits related to kallar by sitush and mathewvanitas. they are constantly rejecting well referenced contents and pushing their veiws fiercly. there seems to b personal agenda. no one should be allowed to impose on others in this way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweapstalker ( talkcontribs) 16:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Edits at Kallar (caste)

Greetings, your edits at Kallar (caste) have been reverted since you did not provide any reference verifying the accuracy of the information. I'm sure you will agree that it is vitally important that the article remain credible and verifiable, so we must work together to maintain a high standard of evidence. I suggest readying WP:verifiability to understand how best to support the data in the article and any new additions, as well as WP:Footnotes for any technical information on adding footnotes. Feel free to contact me on my Talk page if you have any questions. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 17:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, Veenay.bl. You have new messages at Talk:Kallar_(caste)#Suggested_topics_for_expansion.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MatthewVanitas ( talk) 20:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Please use accurate Edit Summaries

Note that removing an entire cited sentence does not count as "Spelling and Typos". I would exercise more caution, particularly since that sentence could be seen as controversial, so removing it without explanation could be interpreted as showing bias, and not mentioning it in the Edit Summary could be seen as dishonestly trying to hide a biased edit. I hope that's not the case, but I would be very careful about clearly explaining your edits in your Summaries each time you save. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 16:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook