|
Thank you for letting me know to update the current picture. The only problem I have had is that when I try to do this it says "Your account is too new" so that is why I have been uploading a new one and trying to link it. Thanks again! -- Pluta0 ( talk)
Thank you very much for what you've done with those three images! It looks great! What you did to this one [1] could do the same with this other picture [2]? -- Lecen ( talk) 21:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Fallschirmjäger ✉ 19:11, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for updating the Top 4 Users log. Turns out I wasn't getting the updates because I only had the old archive page on my watchlist. I'm actually going to start a new archive for 2011, though. Guoguo12 --Talk-- 22:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Use the "new request" button at the top of the page. When you piggyback off the previous request as you do, it looks like you are answering that request. Please don't do it that way, the button is so much easier.-- Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 02:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I retouched a little remaining noises of writing occording to your request. Greetings PawełMM ( talk) 17:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Podłogę można oczywiście wyretuszować, ale to już trochę inna bajka niż usunięcie watermarku.
Pozdrawiam PawełMM ( talk) 13:44, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I see you have recolored a map of Austria-Hungary. While I agree that the new colors look nice, that image was originally meant to show (in light and dark green) the Kingdom of Hungary and its autonomous provinces (i.e. see how it is used in Greater Hungary (political concept)) and that information is now lost.
Could you perhaps retouch the colors so that those regions are clearly distinguishable? Thanks -- 78.14.236.169 ( talk) 16:06, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
!! | MAY IT BE KNOWN FOR FUTURE RECORDS. PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND IF CONSIDERING THIS USER FOR ADMINISTRATOR TASKS, ETC |
User Verathy belittled my efforts to help Wikipedia in the graphic lab. Verathy said they were sloppy and did not appreciate my effort. No feedback was provided as to what was sloppy or what was better done. Instead of encouraging me to help with the project, this user has treated me like an "unwelcome outsider" which stifles help. I am now reluctant to help with the offensive manner in which this user deals with people. I am offended. Nesnad ( talk) 02:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I tried to improve. I hope of better. Thanks for the recognition! Tamba52 ( talk) 19:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Ooops, you're right. I've fixed it. Thanks for letting me know! -- Sisyphos23 ( talk) 18:47, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for being diligent with this image. I'd given it a second shot and was defeated by the damn thing. Your efforts in recognizing the importance of details are what keep Wikipedia a significant and reliable website. You absolutely deserve this barnstar. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ galaxies 15:34, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
For your devoted assurance to the quality of graphic work at the Graphic Lab Top 4, I award you this barnstar! – Kerαunoςcopia◁ galaxies 15:34, 16 April 2011 (UTC) |
– Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 19:48, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Vearthy, I feel the need to explain my decision on the last Top 4 image batch. In the edit summary for this diff, you wrote, "I don't really like the way it's level has been lowered". From my very first New Top 4 to my second to last, my images have been difficult, well-researched (in my opinion), and most importantly, varied (since I believe it was you who were criticized on the Top 4 talk page for continuously using images described as "watermarks ad nauseum"). If you look at the archives, you'll see my Top 4s have included using larger versions of PD images on outside sites, perspective changes, frame removals requiring painting in missing edges, using multiple images to fix one image, crease and shade removals, image restoration, and image stitching, in addition to tricky watermark removals, and all images were checked for usage, importance, and tag dates. But since the last couple of Top 4s have been taking three days to complete instead of 48 hours—and if I set up the Top 4, I refrain from working on more than one image, if any, out of fairness to the graphists—I thought perhaps these Top 4 requests were turning people away. So I figured this one time I would put up a request of all crops to draw in users. Your edit summary is condescending, rude, ill informed, and for some reason, you have been an ass to me since I started here. If you don't like me, there's nothing I can do about it. But don't you dare accuse me of bringing down the Top 4 because I have kept it interesting since the end of April. I have used you as a model for diligence and quality control, as some of the graphists may attest to, and I apologize for putting up a batch of all crops, which I will never do again. But for the love of God, man, show me at least a little respect once in a while. Or contact me on my talk page and tell me everything I've done wrong and we'll sort it out. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 21:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
|
Thank you for letting me know to update the current picture. The only problem I have had is that when I try to do this it says "Your account is too new" so that is why I have been uploading a new one and trying to link it. Thanks again! -- Pluta0 ( talk)
Thank you very much for what you've done with those three images! It looks great! What you did to this one [1] could do the same with this other picture [2]? -- Lecen ( talk) 21:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Fallschirmjäger ✉ 19:11, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for updating the Top 4 Users log. Turns out I wasn't getting the updates because I only had the old archive page on my watchlist. I'm actually going to start a new archive for 2011, though. Guoguo12 --Talk-- 22:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Use the "new request" button at the top of the page. When you piggyback off the previous request as you do, it looks like you are answering that request. Please don't do it that way, the button is so much easier.-- Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 02:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I retouched a little remaining noises of writing occording to your request. Greetings PawełMM ( talk) 17:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Podłogę można oczywiście wyretuszować, ale to już trochę inna bajka niż usunięcie watermarku.
Pozdrawiam PawełMM ( talk) 13:44, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I see you have recolored a map of Austria-Hungary. While I agree that the new colors look nice, that image was originally meant to show (in light and dark green) the Kingdom of Hungary and its autonomous provinces (i.e. see how it is used in Greater Hungary (political concept)) and that information is now lost.
Could you perhaps retouch the colors so that those regions are clearly distinguishable? Thanks -- 78.14.236.169 ( talk) 16:06, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
!! | MAY IT BE KNOWN FOR FUTURE RECORDS. PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND IF CONSIDERING THIS USER FOR ADMINISTRATOR TASKS, ETC |
User Verathy belittled my efforts to help Wikipedia in the graphic lab. Verathy said they were sloppy and did not appreciate my effort. No feedback was provided as to what was sloppy or what was better done. Instead of encouraging me to help with the project, this user has treated me like an "unwelcome outsider" which stifles help. I am now reluctant to help with the offensive manner in which this user deals with people. I am offended. Nesnad ( talk) 02:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I tried to improve. I hope of better. Thanks for the recognition! Tamba52 ( talk) 19:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Ooops, you're right. I've fixed it. Thanks for letting me know! -- Sisyphos23 ( talk) 18:47, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for being diligent with this image. I'd given it a second shot and was defeated by the damn thing. Your efforts in recognizing the importance of details are what keep Wikipedia a significant and reliable website. You absolutely deserve this barnstar. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ galaxies 15:34, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
For your devoted assurance to the quality of graphic work at the Graphic Lab Top 4, I award you this barnstar! – Kerαunoςcopia◁ galaxies 15:34, 16 April 2011 (UTC) |
– Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 19:48, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Vearthy, I feel the need to explain my decision on the last Top 4 image batch. In the edit summary for this diff, you wrote, "I don't really like the way it's level has been lowered". From my very first New Top 4 to my second to last, my images have been difficult, well-researched (in my opinion), and most importantly, varied (since I believe it was you who were criticized on the Top 4 talk page for continuously using images described as "watermarks ad nauseum"). If you look at the archives, you'll see my Top 4s have included using larger versions of PD images on outside sites, perspective changes, frame removals requiring painting in missing edges, using multiple images to fix one image, crease and shade removals, image restoration, and image stitching, in addition to tricky watermark removals, and all images were checked for usage, importance, and tag dates. But since the last couple of Top 4s have been taking three days to complete instead of 48 hours—and if I set up the Top 4, I refrain from working on more than one image, if any, out of fairness to the graphists—I thought perhaps these Top 4 requests were turning people away. So I figured this one time I would put up a request of all crops to draw in users. Your edit summary is condescending, rude, ill informed, and for some reason, you have been an ass to me since I started here. If you don't like me, there's nothing I can do about it. But don't you dare accuse me of bringing down the Top 4 because I have kept it interesting since the end of April. I have used you as a model for diligence and quality control, as some of the graphists may attest to, and I apologize for putting up a batch of all crops, which I will never do again. But for the love of God, man, show me at least a little respect once in a while. Or contact me on my talk page and tell me everything I've done wrong and we'll sort it out. – Kerαunoςcopia◁ gala xies 21:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)