As you know, at the latest discussion here no consensus was reached. That means, per WP:NOCON ("In discussions of proposals to add, modify, or remove material in articles, a lack of consensus commonly results in retaining the version of the article as it was prior to the proposal or bold edit. ...") the status quo ante prevails. If you wish to challenge this, you need to restart the discussion, and stop edit-warring on numerous articles. Thanks. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 09:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
The reason why your proposals have failed & will fail again, is because there's too many editors involved in that topic area, who have opposed & likely always will oppose, the addition of the UK in British bios infoboxes. Trust me, I've been through it. In other words, if enough editors say that 'red' is 'blue', then the result is 'red' is 'blue'. GoodDay ( talk) 05:18, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Firefangledfeathers ( talk) 04:39, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Just a word to the wise that your recent edits on the subject of UK place-names read to me as being very confrontational. I have closed the discussion you started which I hope will mean you feel able to take a break from the subject and move on to an area you find less frustrating. Please remember to be civil and that Wikipedia is not about winning. As you've seen from the template message above, these areas are under discretionary sanctions. Your behaviour is quite close to the line of those sanctions being applied. Regards, The Land ( talk) 11:12, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
If I may Vaze50. Recommend you take a 6-month break from the topic. This isn't a hill that you want to die on. GoodDay ( talk) 18:05, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Spy-cicle💥 Talk? 17:17, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Look, Vaze50, the only reason you're not blocked right now is because your misconduct isn't as egregious as last time. But it still isn't great. You need to stop assuming bad faith and stop casting aspersions on your fellow editors. This WP:BATTLEGROUND conduct is, ultimately, unsustainable. If this behaviour continues, the likelihood that it will lead to the temporary or indefinite revocation of your editing privileges is a near certainty. I also get the sense that there's likely an unwillingness to respect consensus and/or (if applicable) live up to the maxim of WP:ONUS, but I've yet to confirm that (I suspect doing so isn't a necessity at this early stage). Thank you in advance for your close attention to this matter. El_C 19:19, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Vaze50, it's a not hill worth dying on. Maybe 'someday', there'll be enough editors to over-ride those who continue to push against using the terms British & UK, in the bio article intros & infoboxes. But for the moment, that doesn't seem to be the case. GoodDay ( talk) 22:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 21:52, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Good to see, you're still semi-active on the 'pedia :) GoodDay ( talk) 02:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed in revision 973684990, you removed the citation ( [1]) that gave her birth name (Christina). As you're probably aware, Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please be more careful in the future.
As well, it's not clear if the removal was intentional based on the edit summary ("... tidied up intro (removing some unnecessarily long sentences) ..."). If it was, please indicate that sort of thing in the future. Thanks.
—
W.andrea (
talk) 06:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Vaze50 reported by User:ITBF (Result: ). Thank you. ITBF ( talk) 11:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
As you know, at the latest discussion here no consensus was reached. That means, per WP:NOCON ("In discussions of proposals to add, modify, or remove material in articles, a lack of consensus commonly results in retaining the version of the article as it was prior to the proposal or bold edit. ...") the status quo ante prevails. If you wish to challenge this, you need to restart the discussion, and stop edit-warring on numerous articles. Thanks. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 09:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
The reason why your proposals have failed & will fail again, is because there's too many editors involved in that topic area, who have opposed & likely always will oppose, the addition of the UK in British bios infoboxes. Trust me, I've been through it. In other words, if enough editors say that 'red' is 'blue', then the result is 'red' is 'blue'. GoodDay ( talk) 05:18, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Firefangledfeathers ( talk) 04:39, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Just a word to the wise that your recent edits on the subject of UK place-names read to me as being very confrontational. I have closed the discussion you started which I hope will mean you feel able to take a break from the subject and move on to an area you find less frustrating. Please remember to be civil and that Wikipedia is not about winning. As you've seen from the template message above, these areas are under discretionary sanctions. Your behaviour is quite close to the line of those sanctions being applied. Regards, The Land ( talk) 11:12, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
If I may Vaze50. Recommend you take a 6-month break from the topic. This isn't a hill that you want to die on. GoodDay ( talk) 18:05, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Spy-cicle💥 Talk? 17:17, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Look, Vaze50, the only reason you're not blocked right now is because your misconduct isn't as egregious as last time. But it still isn't great. You need to stop assuming bad faith and stop casting aspersions on your fellow editors. This WP:BATTLEGROUND conduct is, ultimately, unsustainable. If this behaviour continues, the likelihood that it will lead to the temporary or indefinite revocation of your editing privileges is a near certainty. I also get the sense that there's likely an unwillingness to respect consensus and/or (if applicable) live up to the maxim of WP:ONUS, but I've yet to confirm that (I suspect doing so isn't a necessity at this early stage). Thank you in advance for your close attention to this matter. El_C 19:19, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Vaze50, it's a not hill worth dying on. Maybe 'someday', there'll be enough editors to over-ride those who continue to push against using the terms British & UK, in the bio article intros & infoboxes. But for the moment, that doesn't seem to be the case. GoodDay ( talk) 22:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 21:52, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Good to see, you're still semi-active on the 'pedia :) GoodDay ( talk) 02:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed in revision 973684990, you removed the citation ( [1]) that gave her birth name (Christina). As you're probably aware, Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please be more careful in the future.
As well, it's not clear if the removal was intentional based on the edit summary ("... tidied up intro (removing some unnecessarily long sentences) ..."). If it was, please indicate that sort of thing in the future. Thanks.
—
W.andrea (
talk) 06:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Vaze50 reported by User:ITBF (Result: ). Thank you. ITBF ( talk) 11:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)