Hi Vantongern959, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Nat Gertler ( talk) 20:34, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
On my talk page, you said "May I ask why you continue to suppress fully-sourced material on the 'Galerie Gmurzynska' page, citing WP:BLPCRIME concerns?" You will find an explanation of that at Talk:Galerie Gmurzynska#BLPCRIME concerns. Instead of trying to repeatedly re-add material to a page that has been stable for months, please join the conversation on that talk page and find consensus before readding. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 20:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Vantongern959! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
Galerie Gmurzynska several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Galerie Gmurzynska, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Nat Gertler ( talk) 16:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
I see by your request for a third opinion that you believe that the "Librarian" has been making recent article edits. As those appears to be the edits that I've been making, it seems possible that you believe that the "Librarian" and I are the same person. I can tell you that that is not the case (it isn't), but I also recognize that if you feel that I/we are engaging in such subterfuge, I would probably not be beyond lying further in that regard. If the two accounts are the same person, "we" would be in violation of the guidelines about editing with a conflict of interest, and probably the policies with regard to paid editing. If you feel that you have sufficient evidence to prove that both accounts are run by the same person, the proper place to report that would be our page for "Sock puppet investigations. Should it be sufficiently shown that the two counts are similarly controlled, then sanctions against me for paid editing are likely easily achieved.
Barring that, however, I ask that you not depict the two accounts as if they were the same. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 17:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Vantongern959, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Nat Gertler ( talk) 20:34, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
On my talk page, you said "May I ask why you continue to suppress fully-sourced material on the 'Galerie Gmurzynska' page, citing WP:BLPCRIME concerns?" You will find an explanation of that at Talk:Galerie Gmurzynska#BLPCRIME concerns. Instead of trying to repeatedly re-add material to a page that has been stable for months, please join the conversation on that talk page and find consensus before readding. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 20:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Vantongern959! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
Galerie Gmurzynska several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Galerie Gmurzynska, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Nat Gertler ( talk) 16:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
I see by your request for a third opinion that you believe that the "Librarian" has been making recent article edits. As those appears to be the edits that I've been making, it seems possible that you believe that the "Librarian" and I are the same person. I can tell you that that is not the case (it isn't), but I also recognize that if you feel that I/we are engaging in such subterfuge, I would probably not be beyond lying further in that regard. If the two accounts are the same person, "we" would be in violation of the guidelines about editing with a conflict of interest, and probably the policies with regard to paid editing. If you feel that you have sufficient evidence to prove that both accounts are run by the same person, the proper place to report that would be our page for "Sock puppet investigations. Should it be sufficiently shown that the two counts are similarly controlled, then sanctions against me for paid editing are likely easily achieved.
Barring that, however, I ask that you not depict the two accounts as if they were the same. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 17:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)