Re your request: I can probably do some diagrams for knitting, but it may take me a while to get to them - been swamped with my day job until a few days ago, and have a huge wiki to-do list. Happy new year... - PKM ( talk) 03:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello again, this month's textile arts newsletter highlights the expansion of top-importance knitting and good article candidacy for Palestinian costumes. We've had several more new articles appear at Template:Did you know and other exciting developments. Regards, Durova Charge! 23:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the textile arts project had an exciting month in February: 7 featured pictures, 2 good articles, and 4 Did you know? entries. There's still time to join our featured portal drive. Our March newsletter has all the developments. Regards, Durova Charge! 00:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
I wanted to know if you (or any friends of yours) are interested in dermatology, and would be willing to help me with the WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force? Kilbad ( talk) 15:40, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi there DroEsperanto!
I live quite close to the park and am fond of its oddness and stubbornness, so I was horrified by someone's suggestion in the talk page to nuke it. I also took the photo, although it's already out of date, given that there's now another condo on the other side of the park. Perhaps I'll take another one when this rotten snow melts.
Mi ankaux parlas esperanto, sed ne bone :) Glad to know there are other Esperantists lurking about Silver Spring!
Cheers babbage ( talk) 03:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that. [1] Forgot how to spell it :P. ChyranandChloe ( talk) 03:27, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello DroEsperanto! You did such an amazing job writing and editing the "University of Chicago" page. However, I was trying to add two more rankings in the table within the "Undergraduate College" section. I was trying to note that UChicago was ranked 1st by College Crunch ( http://www.collegecrunch.org/rankings/top-50-colleges-ranked-for-2009/ ) and 1st by the Princeton Review in 2006 ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wp_YVt7CfJI ). I tried to make changes to the table, but it did not work. I apologize if my format does not follow the Wikipedia format; I am new to Wikipedia editing.
Yeah ok. I was going to go through and add the Done tag to everything once I had done it. I just started seeing so much wrong with the article. GA reviews are so demoralising!
Francium12
12:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi DroEsperanto. I note that you have taken the GA Review for 2003 University of Bristol admissions controversy, but that there is nothing on the talkpage to indicate a review is taking place, and Talk:University of Bristol admissions controversy/GA1 is empty. But I have looked at your contributions and found this, which suggests you are actively engaged in the review. It would assist others now, to know that the review is taking place, and some of the issues being raised - this is so that nobody else starts doing a review, and also so more people can help out and bring the article to GA status. To do this you need to activate Talk:University of Bristol admissions controversy/GA1 by placing your review comments in there. This also assists with record keeping, so when people wish to look into the GA review in the future, it can be clearly seen what went on. If you need any help, let me know. Regards SilkTork * YES! 16:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Yes. Take a look at Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles - "While it is not a reviewer's responsibility to fix an article, fixing small problems is often helpful." But don't get too carried away. If you are making significant changes to an article you may start to become too involved and this may impair your judgement. Regards SilkTork * YES! 23:55, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey there! Thanks for asking, I'm happy to explain my rationale. I meant to redirect Ms. Strawn's article to the diamond's (which I just did, apologies for earlier). However, as for the Easter Sunshine one, I don't feel that either of those two articles contain notability. I've put them up for deletion as a result. You're welcome to comment here. Hope that answered your question! Cheers, Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 03:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi DroEsperanto. Although this is only my third attempt at a GA I think you are supposed to give the user time to act upon the GA review you have given! For example on the last GA I did the article English Poor Laws stayed open for months on hold allowing improvements to be made before the reviewer was approached to decide whether to pass it! Francium12 10:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
I was upset to see an obvious word to avoid in the lead sentence of TFA. Thank you for not only raising the issue on Talk:Polish culture during World War II, but offering a highly literate and persuasive defense of NPOV. Madcoverboy ( talk) 17:14, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for dropping me a note on my talk page. I'm not sure what request you have in mind, but we resolved the misunderstanding yesterday. I applied a {{fact}} tag to a statement about what the school colors represented, not to the places where the colors were recited. I also eliminated repetitive recitals of the school colors and what they represent. I explained it on his talk page. User:Rynlong misunderstood the edits, but we worked it out. The important thing is that communication continues. This is much better than September 2-5, where I would propose a change or explain a change on the talk page, and it would be summarily reverted without comment. I think the article still needs serious work, particularly from experienced editors not associated with the school. Please jump in. Racepacket ( talk) 18:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
As you are one of the principle contributors to the article I wanted to be sure you were aware that University of Chicago has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. Malleus Fatuorum
![]() |
The Chicago Barnstar | |
This Chicago Barnstar has been granted on behalf of WP:CHICAGO for your single-handed effort during a GA Sweeps WP:GAR to help University of Chicago, which is listed as a Top-importance Chicago article, retain its WP:GA status. TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 01:13, 17 September 2009 (UTC) |
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 19:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
My reason for the pointer you removed [2] was in fact in hopes that it would lead to improvement of the article. Would you please consider replacing it with a note to that effect? Thank you. 99.27.132.102 ( talk) 17:27, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I justed edited there because that person's name was there. I have added accurate information neatly and signed. It is up to you to add it into the actual page topic or not- but there is good info on the talk page fro future reference. thanks Ucmaroons( talk) 22:40, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Are you still recording an audio version of this article? The tag on the talk page goes back to July so I thought I'd better ask. -- TS 13:26, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Dear Vanished user 58234729/Archive2: Hello, my name is The Wordsmith; I'm a mediator from the Mediation Cabal, an informal mediation initiative here on Wikipedia. You've recently been named as a dispute participant in a mediation request here:
I'd like to invite you to join this mediation to try to get this dispute resolved, if you wish to do so; note, however, it is entirely your choice whether or not you participate, and if you don't wish to take part in it that's perfectly alright. Please read the above request and, if you do feel that you'd like to take part, please make a note of this on the mediation request page. If you have any questions relating to this or any other dispute, please do let me know; I'll try my best to help you out. Thank you very much. Best regards, The Wordsmith Communicate 21:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed,
History of global warming, is on
article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at
Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a
templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. --
TS
18:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is South Campus Residence Hall. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Campus Residence Hall. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello DroEsperanto, I am the original publisher of the Consus Composite ranking. The discussion for its use is reopened. Since you contributed originally, feel free to rejoin the discussion. I am currently defending its use. Thanks Zoroastrama100 ( talk) 18:37, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I was over on Wiktionary and I came across a recording of yours that I don't believe is completely accurate, and looking at your userpage over there you said to let you know; it is regarding " what she said", it kinda sounds like "that's when she said", thought that you might like to know. Thanks Nowyouseeme talk2me 09:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Please look at the Discussion on the Chicago University page —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArthurGD ( talk • contribs) 14:44, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
User:DroEsperanto/Sandbox/WMS draft, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DroEsperanto/Sandbox/WMS draft and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DroEsperanto/Sandbox/WMS draft during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magioladitis ( talk) 16:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Re your request: I can probably do some diagrams for knitting, but it may take me a while to get to them - been swamped with my day job until a few days ago, and have a huge wiki to-do list. Happy new year... - PKM ( talk) 03:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello again, this month's textile arts newsletter highlights the expansion of top-importance knitting and good article candidacy for Palestinian costumes. We've had several more new articles appear at Template:Did you know and other exciting developments. Regards, Durova Charge! 23:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the textile arts project had an exciting month in February: 7 featured pictures, 2 good articles, and 4 Did you know? entries. There's still time to join our featured portal drive. Our March newsletter has all the developments. Regards, Durova Charge! 00:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
I wanted to know if you (or any friends of yours) are interested in dermatology, and would be willing to help me with the WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force? Kilbad ( talk) 15:40, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi there DroEsperanto!
I live quite close to the park and am fond of its oddness and stubbornness, so I was horrified by someone's suggestion in the talk page to nuke it. I also took the photo, although it's already out of date, given that there's now another condo on the other side of the park. Perhaps I'll take another one when this rotten snow melts.
Mi ankaux parlas esperanto, sed ne bone :) Glad to know there are other Esperantists lurking about Silver Spring!
Cheers babbage ( talk) 03:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that. [1] Forgot how to spell it :P. ChyranandChloe ( talk) 03:27, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello DroEsperanto! You did such an amazing job writing and editing the "University of Chicago" page. However, I was trying to add two more rankings in the table within the "Undergraduate College" section. I was trying to note that UChicago was ranked 1st by College Crunch ( http://www.collegecrunch.org/rankings/top-50-colleges-ranked-for-2009/ ) and 1st by the Princeton Review in 2006 ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wp_YVt7CfJI ). I tried to make changes to the table, but it did not work. I apologize if my format does not follow the Wikipedia format; I am new to Wikipedia editing.
Yeah ok. I was going to go through and add the Done tag to everything once I had done it. I just started seeing so much wrong with the article. GA reviews are so demoralising!
Francium12
12:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi DroEsperanto. I note that you have taken the GA Review for 2003 University of Bristol admissions controversy, but that there is nothing on the talkpage to indicate a review is taking place, and Talk:University of Bristol admissions controversy/GA1 is empty. But I have looked at your contributions and found this, which suggests you are actively engaged in the review. It would assist others now, to know that the review is taking place, and some of the issues being raised - this is so that nobody else starts doing a review, and also so more people can help out and bring the article to GA status. To do this you need to activate Talk:University of Bristol admissions controversy/GA1 by placing your review comments in there. This also assists with record keeping, so when people wish to look into the GA review in the future, it can be clearly seen what went on. If you need any help, let me know. Regards SilkTork * YES! 16:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Yes. Take a look at Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles - "While it is not a reviewer's responsibility to fix an article, fixing small problems is often helpful." But don't get too carried away. If you are making significant changes to an article you may start to become too involved and this may impair your judgement. Regards SilkTork * YES! 23:55, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey there! Thanks for asking, I'm happy to explain my rationale. I meant to redirect Ms. Strawn's article to the diamond's (which I just did, apologies for earlier). However, as for the Easter Sunshine one, I don't feel that either of those two articles contain notability. I've put them up for deletion as a result. You're welcome to comment here. Hope that answered your question! Cheers, Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 03:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi DroEsperanto. Although this is only my third attempt at a GA I think you are supposed to give the user time to act upon the GA review you have given! For example on the last GA I did the article English Poor Laws stayed open for months on hold allowing improvements to be made before the reviewer was approached to decide whether to pass it! Francium12 10:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
I was upset to see an obvious word to avoid in the lead sentence of TFA. Thank you for not only raising the issue on Talk:Polish culture during World War II, but offering a highly literate and persuasive defense of NPOV. Madcoverboy ( talk) 17:14, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for dropping me a note on my talk page. I'm not sure what request you have in mind, but we resolved the misunderstanding yesterday. I applied a {{fact}} tag to a statement about what the school colors represented, not to the places where the colors were recited. I also eliminated repetitive recitals of the school colors and what they represent. I explained it on his talk page. User:Rynlong misunderstood the edits, but we worked it out. The important thing is that communication continues. This is much better than September 2-5, where I would propose a change or explain a change on the talk page, and it would be summarily reverted without comment. I think the article still needs serious work, particularly from experienced editors not associated with the school. Please jump in. Racepacket ( talk) 18:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
As you are one of the principle contributors to the article I wanted to be sure you were aware that University of Chicago has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. Malleus Fatuorum
![]() |
The Chicago Barnstar | |
This Chicago Barnstar has been granted on behalf of WP:CHICAGO for your single-handed effort during a GA Sweeps WP:GAR to help University of Chicago, which is listed as a Top-importance Chicago article, retain its WP:GA status. TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 01:13, 17 September 2009 (UTC) |
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 19:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
My reason for the pointer you removed [2] was in fact in hopes that it would lead to improvement of the article. Would you please consider replacing it with a note to that effect? Thank you. 99.27.132.102 ( talk) 17:27, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I justed edited there because that person's name was there. I have added accurate information neatly and signed. It is up to you to add it into the actual page topic or not- but there is good info on the talk page fro future reference. thanks Ucmaroons( talk) 22:40, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Are you still recording an audio version of this article? The tag on the talk page goes back to July so I thought I'd better ask. -- TS 13:26, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Dear Vanished user 58234729/Archive2: Hello, my name is The Wordsmith; I'm a mediator from the Mediation Cabal, an informal mediation initiative here on Wikipedia. You've recently been named as a dispute participant in a mediation request here:
I'd like to invite you to join this mediation to try to get this dispute resolved, if you wish to do so; note, however, it is entirely your choice whether or not you participate, and if you don't wish to take part in it that's perfectly alright. Please read the above request and, if you do feel that you'd like to take part, please make a note of this on the mediation request page. If you have any questions relating to this or any other dispute, please do let me know; I'll try my best to help you out. Thank you very much. Best regards, The Wordsmith Communicate 21:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed,
History of global warming, is on
article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at
Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a
templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. --
TS
18:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is South Campus Residence Hall. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Campus Residence Hall. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello DroEsperanto, I am the original publisher of the Consus Composite ranking. The discussion for its use is reopened. Since you contributed originally, feel free to rejoin the discussion. I am currently defending its use. Thanks Zoroastrama100 ( talk) 18:37, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I was over on Wiktionary and I came across a recording of yours that I don't believe is completely accurate, and looking at your userpage over there you said to let you know; it is regarding " what she said", it kinda sounds like "that's when she said", thought that you might like to know. Thanks Nowyouseeme talk2me 09:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Please look at the Discussion on the Chicago University page —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArthurGD ( talk • contribs) 14:44, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
User:DroEsperanto/Sandbox/WMS draft, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DroEsperanto/Sandbox/WMS draft and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:DroEsperanto/Sandbox/WMS draft during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magioladitis ( talk) 16:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)