{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Ed
[talk]
[majestic titan] 23:14, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Vanished User 13579 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have not violated any policies that I am aware of. No evidence that I am abusing multiple accounts has been provided. Therefore I can only conclude that this block was made in error and should be undone. Vanished User 13579 ( talk) 23:28, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Users who have exercised account renaming as part of their RTV may not continue to edit - they have, after all, left Wikipedia for good ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vanished User 13579 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Sorry, won't do. Have I renamed this account? When? Please show me the log. Otherwise I reiterate my previous request rationale: I have not violated any policies that I am aware of. No evidence that I am abusing multiple accounts has been provided. Therefore I can only conclude that this block was made in error and should be undone. Vanished User 13579 ( talk) 23:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
At best you'll be unblocked and immediately reblocked as a misleading user name, and a disruptive one at that.-- jpgordon ::==( o ) 00:04, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Question for Jpgordan: Can you point me to the applicable policy that forbids having a user name claiming to be a vanished user? If you can substantiate that I will not continue to request an unblock. As for being disruptive, how so? -- Vanished User 13579 ( talk) 00:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
You asked Jpgordan above Can you point me to the applicable policy that forbids having a user name claiming to be a vanished user? . Here you go:
And just to make sure there's no further confusion on this subject, I've gone ahead and specifically added claiming that you are a returning user to the list of prohibited usernames. Raul654 ( talk) 20:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Ed
[talk]
[majestic titan] 23:14, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Vanished User 13579 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have not violated any policies that I am aware of. No evidence that I am abusing multiple accounts has been provided. Therefore I can only conclude that this block was made in error and should be undone. Vanished User 13579 ( talk) 23:28, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Users who have exercised account renaming as part of their RTV may not continue to edit - they have, after all, left Wikipedia for good ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vanished User 13579 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Sorry, won't do. Have I renamed this account? When? Please show me the log. Otherwise I reiterate my previous request rationale: I have not violated any policies that I am aware of. No evidence that I am abusing multiple accounts has been provided. Therefore I can only conclude that this block was made in error and should be undone. Vanished User 13579 ( talk) 23:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
At best you'll be unblocked and immediately reblocked as a misleading user name, and a disruptive one at that.-- jpgordon ::==( o ) 00:04, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Question for Jpgordan: Can you point me to the applicable policy that forbids having a user name claiming to be a vanished user? If you can substantiate that I will not continue to request an unblock. As for being disruptive, how so? -- Vanished User 13579 ( talk) 00:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
You asked Jpgordan above Can you point me to the applicable policy that forbids having a user name claiming to be a vanished user? . Here you go:
And just to make sure there's no further confusion on this subject, I've gone ahead and specifically added claiming that you are a returning user to the list of prohibited usernames. Raul654 ( talk) 20:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)