c:\ Archive |
C:\ ├Archive 1(2006) ├Archive 2(20071/2) ├Archive 3(20072/2) └Archive 4(20081/2)]] |
67.165.216.16 is hard-banned user Primetime ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). If you see any edits by that IP or by users who appear to be him please contact me or another admin. All of his contributions should be reverted on sight. - Will Beback · † · 01:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
I saw your discussion with User talk:Patrick about Help:Sorting. Check out my note on Help talk:Sorting about a possible improvement on the {{ Dts}}. — MrDolomite | Talk 18:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
It seems you've done something good on my User Page regarding Categorizations, but what?
Thanks for fixing the refs. I like your solution. I'm also glad that somebody actually looked at the article. -- Karlhahn 00:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
you didn't do research at all. Icons like these cases won't break the layout. You just made the mountain out of the molehills. You didn't provide any concrete evidence AT ALL why adding these icons is no good. Your reason is not sufficed. 72.138.191.63 17:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Good call; it was never my intention to sound like I was giving an ultimatum—obviously, I did, though. Thanks for the note and the reasoning behind keeping it a separate article. — Scouter Sig 19:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Seems like someone's got a little problem over on Greatness. A few more edits, and I say we take it to RfC or an admin for further action. -- HubHikari 17:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Why do you delete my addition to the Lebowski post? I presume you're a robot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lebowskidc ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for the literature; I'll give them a read right now. As for my posts, however, I'm sorry you're tired, but I'm prepared to place that link up for however long it takes. Lebowski DC features the best Lebowski trivia I've ever seen, and people deserve to know about it.
He's on a break until monday, so he won't get your message. I wasn't sure about it either, but the bold around "oppose" leads me to believe he did want it to count. yandman 09:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi. You are one of many editors having expressed a concern about the licence for David Liuzzo's maps. He already changed this for the European countries without EU-highlighting, see Commons - Template:Europe location. The creator promised to do so as well for their version with EU-highlighting, and nothing will go on as long as this may not have been taken care of. Meanwhile, in case you like to inspect the presently modified licence and wish to comment on it, please do so in the subsection Comments on the February 2007 new licence for David Liuzzo maps. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 3 Feb 2007 17:12 (UTC)
This edit seems to have broken sortability of the numbers columns using a thousands separator, at least in Firefox 2.0. Could you try to figure out what's wrong? If we can't get it to work I think we need to remove the separators again ..-- Eloquence * 08:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
On the WikiProject Countries talk page, you had either explictly declared a general interest in the project, or had participated at a discussion that appears related to
Location Maps for European countries.
New maps had been created by David Liuzzo, and are available for the countries of the European continent, and for countries of the European Union exist in two versions. From
November 16,
2006 till
January 31,
2007, a poll had tried to find a consensus for usage of 'old' or of which and where 'new' version maps. At its closing, 25 people had spoken in favor of either of the two presented usages of new versions but neither version had reached a consensus (12 and 13), and 18 had preferred old maps.
As this outcome cannot justify reverting of new maps that had become used for some countries, seconds before
February 5,
2007 a survey started that will be closed at
February 20,
2007 23:59:59. It should establish whether the new style maps may be applied as soon as some might become available for countries outside the European continent (or such to depend on future discussions), and also which new version should be applied for which countries.
Please note that since
January 1,
2007 all new maps became updated by David Liuzzo (including a world locator, enlarged cut-out for small countries) and as of
February 4,
2007 the restricted licence that had jeopardized their availability on Wikimedia Commons, became more free. The subsections on the talk page that had shown David Liuzzo's original maps, now show his most recent design.
Please read the
discussion (also in other sections
α,
β,
γ,
δ,
ε,
ζ,
η,
θ) and in particular the arguments offered by the forementioned poll, while realizing some comments to have been made prior to updating the maps, and all prior to modifying the licences, before carefully reading the
presentation of the currently open survey. You are invited to only then finally make up your mind and vote for only one option.
There mustnot be 'oppose' votes; if none of the options would be appreciated, you could vote for the option you might with some effort find least difficult to live with - rather like elections only allowing to vote for one of several candidates. Obviously, you are most welcome to leave a brief argumentation with your vote. Kind regards. —
SomeHuman
7 Feb
2007 20:43 (UTC)
Thank you for removing the "Mushrooms in popular culture" section. It has been bothering me for awhile.
Alan Rockefeller ( Talk - contribs) 22:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for telling me. It is my understanding that I don't have to respond to it now, not at least until another editor gets behind the request and someone adds actual evidence to the complaint (e.g. diffs). Or do you think I should respond to it now? I'm not familiar with the RFC/U process. RB 9 7 2 09:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
You have outclassed me! Its very good!!! a couple of things could make it clearer - the displacement piston in the single frame images should probably not be blue and the cutaway could use an outline for clarity... - Zephyris Talk 01:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Van helsing, thank you for reverting that anon's threat from my talk page. SlimVirgin (talk) 08:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita#Netherlands_Antilles.2C_Netherlands..._but_not_Aruba. Makes sense to me now. -- Shirt58 09:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I was admiring your animation of the mechanism behind a swashplate engine ( [6]) and was curious as to the specific sources you drew upon for the model. Could you please provide some link or name a literary source? Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lombar2 ( talk • contribs) 05:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
Your recent edit to Category:Balanced arm lamp ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
You're welcome, Tim w. 23:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I started a discussion at Template talk:Sortablename, since there seem to be a number of unconnected efforts to create sortkeys for sortable wikitables. ~ trialsanderrors 23:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
While I completely agree with your edits, I fear that the creation of the subheadings European Union, China and India will have two unwanted consequences (that have happened before, about a year ago and which ended in the deletion of all five subarticles about "emerging superpowers") for the page: (1) people will slowly and gradually start to expand the subsections, and possibly even create subarticles. This is what I often call subsection creep. The page is about superpower, not about potential superpowers; and (2) people will start to add Russia, and possibly even Brazil and Japan as potential superpowers. They will provide references that some academic or journalist once said that these could become superpowers and it will be impossible to ignore these claims - as they have provided references, as it would be POV to ignore these claims, and because it would constitute OR when we would (rightly) claim that the EU, China (and India) are considered the entities with the most potential. Without the subheadings people won't be tempted as easily. My suggestion is that we trim the section about potential superpowers down so that headings wouldn't be necessary as every potential superpower only gets one paragraph. What do you think? Sijo Ripa 13:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
With regard to ABB/Lummus, note that we do have an existing article on Combustion Engineering; this may help. Atlant 16:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi thanks. What I found there is how to do it by hand. editing every singe cell is quite time consuming though. Is there no easier way? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Etidepeti ( talk • contribs)
Show me the way-- Gp 1980 16:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for updating the map in the List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita. However, it looks a little strange, because of indicating irrelevant ranges of figures. e.g. 0-250, and 250-500; The map includes no country having a GDP PPP per capita within these ranges, so why did you indicate them? This is not a nominal GDP per capita map, right? And what about the other "arbitrary" numerical borders of ranges, as 6250, etc.? Eliko 13:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
hey why did you delete that takefly piece from the article...im rob jeffries and i go to that school...i am in takefly...who come from that school...so i think if a pupil is putting up information which is true...then you should replace...i bet you dont even know where chester is...and no it isn't where hollyoaks is...because hollyoaks never comes to chester because its all filmed in liverpool!.....so please...revert the queens park high school page!
Hopefully, you can add the Citation - I've tried, but got lost somewhere The citation is from the Zippo Collectors Guide, ( http://www.zippoclick.com/media/pdf/collectorsGuide.pdf) Cabaret4059
c:\ Archive |
C:\ ├Archive 1(2006) ├Archive 2(20071/2) ├Archive 3(20072/2) └Archive 4(20081/2)]] |
67.165.216.16 is hard-banned user Primetime ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). If you see any edits by that IP or by users who appear to be him please contact me or another admin. All of his contributions should be reverted on sight. - Will Beback · † · 01:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
I saw your discussion with User talk:Patrick about Help:Sorting. Check out my note on Help talk:Sorting about a possible improvement on the {{ Dts}}. — MrDolomite | Talk 18:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
It seems you've done something good on my User Page regarding Categorizations, but what?
Thanks for fixing the refs. I like your solution. I'm also glad that somebody actually looked at the article. -- Karlhahn 00:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
you didn't do research at all. Icons like these cases won't break the layout. You just made the mountain out of the molehills. You didn't provide any concrete evidence AT ALL why adding these icons is no good. Your reason is not sufficed. 72.138.191.63 17:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Good call; it was never my intention to sound like I was giving an ultimatum—obviously, I did, though. Thanks for the note and the reasoning behind keeping it a separate article. — Scouter Sig 19:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Seems like someone's got a little problem over on Greatness. A few more edits, and I say we take it to RfC or an admin for further action. -- HubHikari 17:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Why do you delete my addition to the Lebowski post? I presume you're a robot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lebowskidc ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for the literature; I'll give them a read right now. As for my posts, however, I'm sorry you're tired, but I'm prepared to place that link up for however long it takes. Lebowski DC features the best Lebowski trivia I've ever seen, and people deserve to know about it.
He's on a break until monday, so he won't get your message. I wasn't sure about it either, but the bold around "oppose" leads me to believe he did want it to count. yandman 09:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi. You are one of many editors having expressed a concern about the licence for David Liuzzo's maps. He already changed this for the European countries without EU-highlighting, see Commons - Template:Europe location. The creator promised to do so as well for their version with EU-highlighting, and nothing will go on as long as this may not have been taken care of. Meanwhile, in case you like to inspect the presently modified licence and wish to comment on it, please do so in the subsection Comments on the February 2007 new licence for David Liuzzo maps. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 3 Feb 2007 17:12 (UTC)
This edit seems to have broken sortability of the numbers columns using a thousands separator, at least in Firefox 2.0. Could you try to figure out what's wrong? If we can't get it to work I think we need to remove the separators again ..-- Eloquence * 08:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
On the WikiProject Countries talk page, you had either explictly declared a general interest in the project, or had participated at a discussion that appears related to
Location Maps for European countries.
New maps had been created by David Liuzzo, and are available for the countries of the European continent, and for countries of the European Union exist in two versions. From
November 16,
2006 till
January 31,
2007, a poll had tried to find a consensus for usage of 'old' or of which and where 'new' version maps. At its closing, 25 people had spoken in favor of either of the two presented usages of new versions but neither version had reached a consensus (12 and 13), and 18 had preferred old maps.
As this outcome cannot justify reverting of new maps that had become used for some countries, seconds before
February 5,
2007 a survey started that will be closed at
February 20,
2007 23:59:59. It should establish whether the new style maps may be applied as soon as some might become available for countries outside the European continent (or such to depend on future discussions), and also which new version should be applied for which countries.
Please note that since
January 1,
2007 all new maps became updated by David Liuzzo (including a world locator, enlarged cut-out for small countries) and as of
February 4,
2007 the restricted licence that had jeopardized their availability on Wikimedia Commons, became more free. The subsections on the talk page that had shown David Liuzzo's original maps, now show his most recent design.
Please read the
discussion (also in other sections
α,
β,
γ,
δ,
ε,
ζ,
η,
θ) and in particular the arguments offered by the forementioned poll, while realizing some comments to have been made prior to updating the maps, and all prior to modifying the licences, before carefully reading the
presentation of the currently open survey. You are invited to only then finally make up your mind and vote for only one option.
There mustnot be 'oppose' votes; if none of the options would be appreciated, you could vote for the option you might with some effort find least difficult to live with - rather like elections only allowing to vote for one of several candidates. Obviously, you are most welcome to leave a brief argumentation with your vote. Kind regards. —
SomeHuman
7 Feb
2007 20:43 (UTC)
Thank you for removing the "Mushrooms in popular culture" section. It has been bothering me for awhile.
Alan Rockefeller ( Talk - contribs) 22:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for telling me. It is my understanding that I don't have to respond to it now, not at least until another editor gets behind the request and someone adds actual evidence to the complaint (e.g. diffs). Or do you think I should respond to it now? I'm not familiar with the RFC/U process. RB 9 7 2 09:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
You have outclassed me! Its very good!!! a couple of things could make it clearer - the displacement piston in the single frame images should probably not be blue and the cutaway could use an outline for clarity... - Zephyris Talk 01:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Van helsing, thank you for reverting that anon's threat from my talk page. SlimVirgin (talk) 08:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita#Netherlands_Antilles.2C_Netherlands..._but_not_Aruba. Makes sense to me now. -- Shirt58 09:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I was admiring your animation of the mechanism behind a swashplate engine ( [6]) and was curious as to the specific sources you drew upon for the model. Could you please provide some link or name a literary source? Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lombar2 ( talk • contribs) 05:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
Your recent edit to Category:Balanced arm lamp ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
You're welcome, Tim w. 23:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I started a discussion at Template talk:Sortablename, since there seem to be a number of unconnected efforts to create sortkeys for sortable wikitables. ~ trialsanderrors 23:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
While I completely agree with your edits, I fear that the creation of the subheadings European Union, China and India will have two unwanted consequences (that have happened before, about a year ago and which ended in the deletion of all five subarticles about "emerging superpowers") for the page: (1) people will slowly and gradually start to expand the subsections, and possibly even create subarticles. This is what I often call subsection creep. The page is about superpower, not about potential superpowers; and (2) people will start to add Russia, and possibly even Brazil and Japan as potential superpowers. They will provide references that some academic or journalist once said that these could become superpowers and it will be impossible to ignore these claims - as they have provided references, as it would be POV to ignore these claims, and because it would constitute OR when we would (rightly) claim that the EU, China (and India) are considered the entities with the most potential. Without the subheadings people won't be tempted as easily. My suggestion is that we trim the section about potential superpowers down so that headings wouldn't be necessary as every potential superpower only gets one paragraph. What do you think? Sijo Ripa 13:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
With regard to ABB/Lummus, note that we do have an existing article on Combustion Engineering; this may help. Atlant 16:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi thanks. What I found there is how to do it by hand. editing every singe cell is quite time consuming though. Is there no easier way? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Etidepeti ( talk • contribs)
Show me the way-- Gp 1980 16:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for updating the map in the List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita. However, it looks a little strange, because of indicating irrelevant ranges of figures. e.g. 0-250, and 250-500; The map includes no country having a GDP PPP per capita within these ranges, so why did you indicate them? This is not a nominal GDP per capita map, right? And what about the other "arbitrary" numerical borders of ranges, as 6250, etc.? Eliko 13:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
hey why did you delete that takefly piece from the article...im rob jeffries and i go to that school...i am in takefly...who come from that school...so i think if a pupil is putting up information which is true...then you should replace...i bet you dont even know where chester is...and no it isn't where hollyoaks is...because hollyoaks never comes to chester because its all filmed in liverpool!.....so please...revert the queens park high school page!
Hopefully, you can add the Citation - I've tried, but got lost somewhere The citation is from the Zippo Collectors Guide, ( http://www.zippoclick.com/media/pdf/collectorsGuide.pdf) Cabaret4059