Hello, Vadim Kiev, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Chastushka may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Before you get yourself into trouble, please get yourself familiar with wikipedia rules WP:CITE and WP:CIVILITY. - Altenmann >t 22:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
WP:CITE#Dealing_with_unsourced_material: If an article is unreferenced, you can tag it with the "unreferenced" template Vadim Kiev ( talk) 12:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Please see a complaint about your edits here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Vadim Kiev reported by User:Altenmann (Result: ). Though you might be adding correct information, you have not provided any sources. Your information can't remain in Wikipedia if there is no publication where it can be confirmed. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 23:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
WP:CITE#Dealing_with_unsourced_material: If an article is unreferenced, you can tag it with the "unreferenced" template Vadim Kiev ( talk) 12:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:36, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did on
Dacha. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
NeilN
talk to me
15:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Also, WP:edit warring and ad hominem attacks on opponents will lead you to a block in a matter of hours. Find and demonstrate sources for your stuff before reverting other guys. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 15:25, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
User:Vadim Kiev. Thank you.
NeilN
talk to me
15:03, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as
vandalism, such as the edit at
Dacha, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism is disruptive. Please read
Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. If you continue to label Altenmann's edits as vandalism, things will go poorly for you at ANI.
NeilN
talk to me
18:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Dacha shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN talk to me 18:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Info I have about him:
Altenmann is a long-time editor who became an admin. He used multiple sockpuppets to influence discussions, was discovered, and was desysoped and banned from editing. He requested a lifting of the ban, which was granted by ArbCom after community discussion, but was restricted to one account.
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page edits, as you did at
Talk:Dacha, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
NeilN
talk to me
21:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 21:24, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Baba (slavic word). Since you had some involvement with the Baba (slavic word) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 11:45, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Vadim Kiev, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Chastushka may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Before you get yourself into trouble, please get yourself familiar with wikipedia rules WP:CITE and WP:CIVILITY. - Altenmann >t 22:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
WP:CITE#Dealing_with_unsourced_material: If an article is unreferenced, you can tag it with the "unreferenced" template Vadim Kiev ( talk) 12:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Please see a complaint about your edits here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Vadim Kiev reported by User:Altenmann (Result: ). Though you might be adding correct information, you have not provided any sources. Your information can't remain in Wikipedia if there is no publication where it can be confirmed. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 23:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
WP:CITE#Dealing_with_unsourced_material: If an article is unreferenced, you can tag it with the "unreferenced" template Vadim Kiev ( talk) 12:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:36, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did on
Dacha. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
NeilN
talk to me
15:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Also, WP:edit warring and ad hominem attacks on opponents will lead you to a block in a matter of hours. Find and demonstrate sources for your stuff before reverting other guys. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 15:25, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
User:Vadim Kiev. Thank you.
NeilN
talk to me
15:03, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as
vandalism, such as the edit at
Dacha, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism is disruptive. Please read
Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. If you continue to label Altenmann's edits as vandalism, things will go poorly for you at ANI.
NeilN
talk to me
18:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Dacha shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN talk to me 18:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Info I have about him:
Altenmann is a long-time editor who became an admin. He used multiple sockpuppets to influence discussions, was discovered, and was desysoped and banned from editing. He requested a lifting of the ban, which was granted by ArbCom after community discussion, but was restricted to one account.
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page edits, as you did at
Talk:Dacha, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
NeilN
talk to me
21:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 21:24, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Baba (slavic word). Since you had some involvement with the Baba (slavic word) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 11:45, 2 February 2020 (UTC)