Welcome!
Hello, Unkle25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
MegaHasher
12:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
You have an agenda... WP:POV -- knock it off. -- DashaKat 02:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Writing descriptions in a concise manner, and including citations are useful practices when making edits on controversial topics. MegaHasher 23:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
I think you have me confused with DashaKat. I don't recall reverting your input and have actually supported what you added about feedback in the talk page. --
CloudSurfer
18:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary. Thank you.
Aleta (
talk)
15:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the
external links you added to the page
Panic attack do not comply with our
guidelines for external links and have been removed.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for
advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the
article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Gwernol
11:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that David Carbonell meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.
Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Carbonell. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.
Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Teleomatic ( talk) 04:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow editor! It seems that you've recently made some minor, questionable edits to the
Panic Attack article. Your edit summary, "Just edited the intro slightly... Minor other edits here and there." is fairly ambiguous and does not accurately reflect your actual edits. Replacing numbers and quantities in articles without
sourcing your information goes against editor policy and could be considered
vandalism in extreme cases. In the future, please do not make such edits unless you can properly source them, and please try to write more specific edit summaries. Thanks, and happy editing! :) --
ž¥łǿχ (
ŧäłķ |
čøŋŧřīъ§)
15:11, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
For creators: ==AfD nomination of Edmund Bourne==
I have nominated Edmund Bourne, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund Bourne. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Richard Hock ( talk) 13:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello Unkle25! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
872 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 21:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Unkle25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
MegaHasher
12:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
You have an agenda... WP:POV -- knock it off. -- DashaKat 02:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Writing descriptions in a concise manner, and including citations are useful practices when making edits on controversial topics. MegaHasher 23:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
I think you have me confused with DashaKat. I don't recall reverting your input and have actually supported what you added about feedback in the talk page. --
CloudSurfer
18:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary. Thank you.
Aleta (
talk)
15:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the
external links you added to the page
Panic attack do not comply with our
guidelines for external links and have been removed.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for
advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the
article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Gwernol
11:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that David Carbonell meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.
Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Carbonell. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.
Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Teleomatic ( talk) 04:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow editor! It seems that you've recently made some minor, questionable edits to the
Panic Attack article. Your edit summary, "Just edited the intro slightly... Minor other edits here and there." is fairly ambiguous and does not accurately reflect your actual edits. Replacing numbers and quantities in articles without
sourcing your information goes against editor policy and could be considered
vandalism in extreme cases. In the future, please do not make such edits unless you can properly source them, and please try to write more specific edit summaries. Thanks, and happy editing! :) --
ž¥łǿχ (
ŧäłķ |
čøŋŧřīъ§)
15:11, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
For creators: ==AfD nomination of Edmund Bourne==
I have nominated Edmund Bourne, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund Bourne. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Richard Hock ( talk) 13:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello Unkle25! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
872 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 21:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)