You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Bruce Lee. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Shaolin Samurai (
talk)
04:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Bruce Lee. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Gun Powder Ma (
talk)
00:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
Talk:Bruce Lee. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --
Atama
頭
01:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Atama 頭 02:05, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
SGGH
ping!
19:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)This is a big mistake.
Gun Powder Ma ( talk) is the one who wants to make some changes from a “long-term support version” of Bruce Lee’s article.
Gun Powder Ma should be the one needed to provide external, reliable sources and reasonably explanations to support his/her dispute.
I can’t understand why I’ve been blocked ? Undefeatedcooler ( talk) 16:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Bruce Lee. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Nate
t/
c
14:13, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Bruce Lee. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Gun Powder Ma (
talk)
16:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Another editor has recently posted a wikiquette alert concerning some of your comments on Talk:Bruce Lee.
Accusing other editors of racism, as you did
here and
here is unacceptable, especially since you
had already been warned not to continue doing so. If you make any further such accusations you will very likely be blocked.
—
David Wilson (
talk ·
cont)
01:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
You have violated the
three-revert rule. Any
administrator may now choose to
block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring.--
Mike -
Μολὼν λαβέ 13:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
I have reported this to the Admin Noticeboard. This is not the first time that you have done this. Please stop and take it to the talk page. Thank you.--
Mike -
Μολὼν λαβέ
13:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Bruce Lee. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Shaolin Samurai (
talk)
04:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Bruce Lee. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Gun Powder Ma (
talk)
00:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
Talk:Bruce Lee. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --
Atama
頭
01:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Atama 頭 02:05, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
SGGH
ping!
19:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)This is a big mistake.
Gun Powder Ma ( talk) is the one who wants to make some changes from a “long-term support version” of Bruce Lee’s article.
Gun Powder Ma should be the one needed to provide external, reliable sources and reasonably explanations to support his/her dispute.
I can’t understand why I’ve been blocked ? Undefeatedcooler ( talk) 16:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Bruce Lee. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Nate
t/
c
14:13, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Bruce Lee. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Gun Powder Ma (
talk)
16:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Another editor has recently posted a wikiquette alert concerning some of your comments on Talk:Bruce Lee.
Accusing other editors of racism, as you did
here and
here is unacceptable, especially since you
had already been warned not to continue doing so. If you make any further such accusations you will very likely be blocked.
—
David Wilson (
talk ·
cont)
01:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
You have violated the
three-revert rule. Any
administrator may now choose to
block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring.--
Mike -
Μολὼν λαβέ 13:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
I have reported this to the Admin Noticeboard. This is not the first time that you have done this. Please stop and take it to the talk page. Thank you.--
Mike -
Μολὼν λαβέ
13:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)