TyroneBiggums23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Would like to edit constructively and get second chance after a rough start where I was wrong and made mistakes, due to edit warring, but when I try to do so I am attacked by admin writ keeper. Why bother spending all the effort to prevent someone who wants to contribute? Why not go for the real bad guys that solely attempt to damage? I agreed to stop edit wars long ago. Tired of making new accounts and wasting everyone's time, would greatly appreciate another shot at this. Thank you. TyroneBiggums23 ( talk) 06:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
We don't unblock socks, ever. You should request an unblock from your original account. Max Semenik ( talk) 09:20, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TyroneBiggums23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have no option to appeal at original account, it was taken away because it was wrongfully accused of being a sock for another user. Isn't there such a thing as a clean start?
Decline reason:
In that case, you'll need to appeal directly to ArbCom. - jpgordon ::==( o ) 17:49, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TyroneBiggums23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Would like to edit constructively and get second chance after a rough start where I was wrong and made mistakes, due to edit warring, but when I try to do so I am attacked by admin writ keeper. Why bother spending all the effort to prevent someone who wants to contribute? Why not go for the real bad guys that solely attempt to damage? I agreed to stop edit wars long ago. Tired of making new accounts and wasting everyone's time, would greatly appreciate another shot at this. Thank you. TyroneBiggums23 ( talk) 06:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
We don't unblock socks, ever. You should request an unblock from your original account. Max Semenik ( talk) 09:20, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TyroneBiggums23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have no option to appeal at original account, it was taken away because it was wrongfully accused of being a sock for another user. Isn't there such a thing as a clean start?
Decline reason:
In that case, you'll need to appeal directly to ArbCom. - jpgordon ::==( o ) 17:49, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.