Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Shayetet 13. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. 930913( Congratulate) 07:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello, Tyalav! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being " adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! -—  Gadget850 (Ed)  talk 10:18, 10 June 2010 (UTC) reply Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Shayetet 13. Thank you. 930913( Congratulate) 11:59, 10 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shayetet 13, you may be blocked from editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Der rikkk ( talk • contribs) 15:45, 15 June 2010 (UTC) reply

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{ unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I counted you making the exact same edit five times at Shayetet 13. Please take this opportunity to read WP:3RR.

TFOWR 09:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is No interest in Israel or Palestine? Excellent! A moment of your time, if you please.... Thank you.

Tyalav, I appreciate that you won't be able to comment at ANI during your block. I've watchlisted your talk page and will happily copy any comments you wish to make at ANI from here to ANI.

TFOWR 09:34, 16 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Disregard that, editors at Shayetet 13 hadn't been notified of the Arbcom sanctions. Apologies for the noise...! Do note, however, that these sanctions do now apply at Shayetet 13, and editors have now been informed (there's an WP:Edit notice every editor will see before editing). TFOWR 12:14, 16 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi

I blocked you for edit-warring a few days ago. I notice that you've reverted to your preferred version here, without any apparent effort to discuss your edit.

Your edit consists of two apparent reverts. I would strongly recommend that you consider reverting yourself, and pay close attention to your future editing. You have now clearly been notified about Arbcom's 1RR restriction, and I am disappointed that you appear to have ignored this.

TFOWR 08:35, 18 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi I'm trying to resolve the issues which arose with your edits to the article Shayetet 13. First of all, please provide appropriate references to your claims. For instance "Especially a 19 year old boy Furkan Doğan who was shot 4 times from his face and one from the back was the strong evidence of how a massacre had occured." Such claims have to be based on verifiable references. You should also try to maintain a neutral point of view and leave personal opinions of this unit or the Gaza flotilla operation out of the article. The "see also" section of this article exists for the purpose of showing other, more well known units from other countries i.e. the US Navy Seals so readers get a better idea of Shayetet 13. Three or four units are enough to get the point across. It is not necessary to add more units here and to create an unnecessarily long list with foreign units. It would be much easier to bring this issue to an end if you participated in discussions rather than just posting the same content in the article over and over again. Thank you -- Der rikkk ( talk) 13:16, 18 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Again, you added the same content. Please, stop. -- Kslotte ( talk) 14:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a short time to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

TFOWR 14:10, 18 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Shayetet 13, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JamesBWatson ( talk) 06:59, 21 June 2010 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{ unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo ( talk) 07:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC) reply

This is now your third block for edit warring. If you continue to edit war after your block expires, I expect that next block to be considerable longer or indefinite. Once the block expires, please stop edit warring. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 07:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC) reply