|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Prince of Viana has been reverted.
Your edit
here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s):
http://blogdeheraldica.blogspot.com/2010/05/heraldica-y-titulos-historicos-del.html. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
07:17, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Not that you're changing the models so official Coat of Navarra for this version that makes no sense. Following the description alone could create a heraldic design that was correct and that it is not. Glazes can only represntarse by a single color tone. the truth that does not pretend to understand this and not even know what language you speak because you are spreading a wrong image for all Wikipedias without any user page editing. Greetings.-- Miguillen ( talk) 21:20, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. I hope Miguillen will accept it. Adelbrecht ( talk) 20:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
The article Armorial of the Crown of Aragon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:NOTGALLERY. We have Coat of arms of the Crown of Aragon, an article with ample explanation. And then we have this gallery of coats of arms, I presume a selection of those with the same stripes, based on the same coat of arms?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Fram (
talk)
14:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Prince of Viana has been reverted.
Your edit
here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s):
http://blogdeheraldica.blogspot.com/2010/05/heraldica-y-titulos-historicos-del.html. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
07:17, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Not that you're changing the models so official Coat of Navarra for this version that makes no sense. Following the description alone could create a heraldic design that was correct and that it is not. Glazes can only represntarse by a single color tone. the truth that does not pretend to understand this and not even know what language you speak because you are spreading a wrong image for all Wikipedias without any user page editing. Greetings.-- Miguillen ( talk) 21:20, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. I hope Miguillen will accept it. Adelbrecht ( talk) 20:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
The article Armorial of the Crown of Aragon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:NOTGALLERY. We have Coat of arms of the Crown of Aragon, an article with ample explanation. And then we have this gallery of coats of arms, I presume a selection of those with the same stripes, based on the same coat of arms?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Fram (
talk)
14:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)