Please refrain from
hijacking pages, as you did with one of the pages you edited. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the
Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Please also see Wikipedia's
disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be
blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on
my talk page. Thank you.
92.17.14.64 (
talk)
14:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Indo-Greek wars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris talk! 19:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to List of wars involving the Gupta Empire. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk) 00:34, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, TuberGotTubed!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~
Liance
talk
17:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
|
Hello TuberGotTubed, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:List of Indo-Burmese wars to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:
I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~ Liance talk 17:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
its a list why refrences? TuberGotTubed ( talk) 18:14, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
are subject to Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines for articles, including verifiability and citing sources.For the previous draftification that I did, If you just want an index of wars in which the Guptas were involved, we already have the more appropriate ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Wars involving the Gupta Empire; lists of wars of a country usually provide more information than just a link to that page, such as the victor, which needs sourcing. Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk) 20:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Flemmish Nietzsche. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Mughal Empire, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Flemmish Nietzsche (
talk)
11:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Sikh empire, you may be
blocked from editing.
RegentsPark (
comment)
12:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Mughal Empire.
RegentsPark (
comment)
12:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Mughal Empire shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Abecedare ( talk) 12:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Partition of India.
Abecedare (
talk)
15:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
While estimates of the number of deaths vary greatly, ranging from 200,000 to 2,000,000, most of the scholars accept approximately 1 million died in the partition violence.citing Roy, who says
Most scholars, using census figures, contemporary press reports, and eyewitness accounts, provide a range between 200,000 and 2 million (Menon and Bhasin 1998; Butalia 1998). Most scholars now accept that approximately 1 million people died from Partition-related violence.
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Maurya Empire.
RegentsPark (
comment)
05:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Abecedare ( talk) 12:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
The following topic ban now applies to you:
You have been indefinitely topic banned from all pages and discussions related to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan
You have been sanctioned because of persistently poor or missing sources for your edits; compare all the warnings above.
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.
If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | tålk 20:02, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
informally called the Indian Civil War by British Media"? Abecedare ( talk) 21:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
TuberGotTubed, it looks like you may not understand what a topic ban is. You have been told you are topic banned from "from all pages and discussions related to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan". That means you must not edit in a way that's related to those subjects anywhere on Wikipedia. Obviously, adding a link to the word "India", as you did here, is related to the topic "India". Please, again, read WP:TBAN, which is a short, simple explanation of how a topic ban works. If you violate your topic ban again, I'll have to block you. Bishonen | tålk 14:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to List of wars involving Punjab. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs overarching sources to show that the subject is notable and to establish inclusion criterion. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Abecedare ( talk) 01:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from
hijacking pages, as you did with one of the pages you edited. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the
Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Please also see Wikipedia's
disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be
blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on
my talk page. Thank you.
92.17.14.64 (
talk)
14:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Indo-Greek wars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris talk! 19:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to List of wars involving the Gupta Empire. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk) 00:34, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, TuberGotTubed!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~
Liance
talk
17:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
|
Hello TuberGotTubed, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:List of Indo-Burmese wars to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:
I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~ Liance talk 17:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
its a list why refrences? TuberGotTubed ( talk) 18:14, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
are subject to Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines for articles, including verifiability and citing sources.For the previous draftification that I did, If you just want an index of wars in which the Guptas were involved, we already have the more appropriate ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Wars involving the Gupta Empire; lists of wars of a country usually provide more information than just a link to that page, such as the victor, which needs sourcing. Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk) 20:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Flemmish Nietzsche. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Mughal Empire, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Flemmish Nietzsche (
talk)
11:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Sikh empire, you may be
blocked from editing.
RegentsPark (
comment)
12:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Mughal Empire.
RegentsPark (
comment)
12:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Mughal Empire shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Abecedare ( talk) 12:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Partition of India.
Abecedare (
talk)
15:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
While estimates of the number of deaths vary greatly, ranging from 200,000 to 2,000,000, most of the scholars accept approximately 1 million died in the partition violence.citing Roy, who says
Most scholars, using census figures, contemporary press reports, and eyewitness accounts, provide a range between 200,000 and 2 million (Menon and Bhasin 1998; Butalia 1998). Most scholars now accept that approximately 1 million people died from Partition-related violence.
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Maurya Empire.
RegentsPark (
comment)
05:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Abecedare ( talk) 12:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
The following topic ban now applies to you:
You have been indefinitely topic banned from all pages and discussions related to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan
You have been sanctioned because of persistently poor or missing sources for your edits; compare all the warnings above.
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.
If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | tålk 20:02, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
informally called the Indian Civil War by British Media"? Abecedare ( talk) 21:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
TuberGotTubed, it looks like you may not understand what a topic ban is. You have been told you are topic banned from "from all pages and discussions related to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan". That means you must not edit in a way that's related to those subjects anywhere on Wikipedia. Obviously, adding a link to the word "India", as you did here, is related to the topic "India". Please, again, read WP:TBAN, which is a short, simple explanation of how a topic ban works. If you violate your topic ban again, I'll have to block you. Bishonen | tålk 14:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to List of wars involving Punjab. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs overarching sources to show that the subject is notable and to establish inclusion criterion. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Abecedare ( talk) 01:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)