TrueCRaysball |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
← Archive 2 • Archive 3 • Archive 4 → |
Jul. 2007 - Jul.2007 |
Ratings are only notable on Wikipedia when they are somehow controversial. In the case of the Manhunt 2 video game for instance, or the movie Live Free or Die Hard. Wikipedia is not a movie guide. It doesn't need to give advice to people whether a movie is suitable for their children. Also, English Wikipedia is not USA biased. The MPAA rating is of no significance to Canadians and Britons etc. I'm from the Netherlands for example. The Simpsons movie is rated All Ages here, but would that be of any use to you as an American if I added that to the article?-- Atlan ( talk) 22:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I shouldn't have said that. However, it is already stated twice in the article that the current U.S. terror level is Elevated; there's no need to state that in the lede section. Also, when you're writing edit summaries, try not to use all caps and lots of exclamation points. -- Core desat 01:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
C'mon.
This is obviously unencyclopedic, and besides no one will ever look the article up using that title. Can you request a speedy deletion for this? Adding {{ db-redirmisnomer}}, {{ db-attack}} or {{ db-test}} to the article page will do the job.
Any pages linking to this title should be fixed as well. / edgarde 01:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
no. People could see that for themselves, the dab page is not a dictionary listing, it should lead to other articles with similar names -- ʇuǝɯɯoɔ ɐqǝɟ 20:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
I was going for a second opinion like my Final Coditions stated to do if I didn't agree with something.-- Hornetman 16 22:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Hey Hornetman ... I thought long and hard about it after looking through the events on your talk page earlier this week, and figured that since I speak your language (in more ways than one), I'd be willing to informally adopt you. Seems that there's a lot of people willing to help out ... but please, let them help you. Blueboy 96 00:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to
The Rock (entertainer). For
legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
Bmg916
Speak
15:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Just so we are clear... I think this is what he was talking about. You added it again. I took it out. -- Ben 02:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
That template says yu can use it as a refrence but okay.-- Hornetman 16 23:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Edge's Belt small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:WrestleMania24logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
things like the length of non title runs arent notable by the guidelines in the Wrestling Project. If you think they should be go and plead your case. BlueShrek 21:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
I think it is a good idea to remove the logos from those pages and replace them with the posters. The logos for those three events are very repetitive and consistent year by year which is why they are used on multiple pages. However that is an unnecessary WP:FU violation. Replacing the repetitive logos with the posters for these three events is a good idea because it fixes this violation problem. Nice work. -- bulletproof 3:16 21:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Just wanted to tell you that the template you've created is up for deletion. Please do not post nonsense on Wikipedia. — Ian Lee ( Talk) 21:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Hornetman, please do not make things like this. It's a giant violation of WP:NDT. If you know something will be regarded as nonsense and you put it on wikipedia anyway, that is WP:VANDALISM, and you can and will be blocked for it -- L augh! 22:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Why is there a speedy delete on my talk page?-- Hornetman 16 23:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
When was it decided that SummerSlam, Royal Rumble and Survivor Series posters where to be moved to the infobox. Bencey 23:56, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Your userpage doesn't conform to WP:USER. Firstly, you've got a totally unsubstantiated paragraph about Chris Benoit. You've also got endless statistics about wrestling. Your userpage isn't the place for you to state your beliefs like that. Look at my userpage, or Riana's, or Daniel's. We describe a (tiny) bit about ourselves, and then mostly elabourate about who we are on Wikipedia. Yours isn't even remotely like that. You need to tone it down a lot before it's an acceptable userpage. And please, do not misrepresent what people have said. Daniel never threatened to block you if you asked him again. And yes, I have read his talkpage. That wasn't what he was saying. -- Deskana (talk) 01:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Could you get the word out especially to Daniel?-- Hornetman 16 01:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Let Daniel know since he's the only one that can okay it and undo the protect from edit thing.-- Hornetman 16 01:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
You need a fair use rationale for every use, along with the copyright tag, otherwise it'll be deleted. "To the uploader: please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use, as described on Wikipedia:Image description page, as well as the source of the work and copyright information." -- Dark Falls talk 02:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
People have been known to survive days, even weeks, even longer after being "taken off life support", which usually means being taken off a ventilator. I agree that he's dying and may already be dead but without an official announcement, adding in a date of death goes against WP:ATT - without attribution it shouldn't be in the encyclopedia, and has the potential of making Wikipedia look bad. -- Charlene 15:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
I can't believe I am going through this again. Yes, people who are not signed in can prod articles. First of all, quote me chapter and verse of where they can't according to wiki rules. Second, even if you can, the fact that the prod went through and was listed shows that people who are not signed in can prod. Deal with the issues brought up in the prod and whether or not they are valid and not who initiated it. 172.150.83.110 11:06, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
As you have already nominated the picture [1], and brought the issue up at WP:PW [2], how about you leave the picture on the article until a consensus has been reached, and if the consensus is to delete it then feel free to do so. But until there is consensus it should stay in the articles it is being used in so those voting on it can see it in context, as your deletion claim does state "No longer relevant to anything.", and keep the picture in place will allow those voting to view its relevance. Darrenhusted 12:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
The fact of the matter is that these lists of reigns by combined lengths are completely unnecessary. The reason for that is that these lists have already been integrated within the articles of lists of reigns by length. For example, the same list found at List of top ECW World Champions by combined length is already found at the bottom of List of ECW World Championship reigns by length. It just seems redundant to have two articles of lists when you can have both lists in one article. It is also obvious trivia. -- bulletproof 3:16 16:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Free use is free of all copyright, fair use still has copyright. Free is preferred. If you have a problem take it to a talk page, don't keep reverting endlessly, you are past 3RR with regards to that page, you revert one more time and I'll report you. As it stand if you are willing to listen then I won't file a report, however other could. Darrenhusted 17:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
I don;t think it's possible for any free use to exsist since it's a copyrighted look-- Hornetman 16 17:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Cease reverting at WWE Championship. You are in violation of the three revert rule. Further reverts will result in a block for edit warring and disruption. -- Deskana (talk) 17:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
No that was Darrenhusted that warned you 5 times. He can't block you on the spot because he isn't an admin. However, Deskana is and he can.-- bulletproof 3:16 17:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Stop, please. Edit warring is bad enough. Edit warring in violation of Resolution:Licensing policy, Wikipedia:Non-free content, and Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria is a completely unacceptable. ElinorD (talk) 17:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for violating the three-revert rule on WWE Championship. Your block will expire in 48 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Deskana (talk) 17:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC) |
TrueCRaysball/Archive ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I doing what I thought was right for Wikipedia I guess I was proven wrong (if you'll read below), so requesting you assume good faith one last time.
Decline reason:
You were validly blocked for violating the three revert rule and you're lucky your block was not extended given your original response. I think you need to sit this one out. WjB scribe 20:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I've tried explaining but you won't let me!-- Hornetman 16 18:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
I was trying an Idea. I wasn't try to edit war.-- Hornetman 16 18:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
I think you need to read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule as well, Hornetman. ElinorD (talk) 18:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
He violated the WP:3RR blocking policy by blocking me for more that 24 hours.-- Hornetman 16 18:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
So he get away with it?! That's BS right there.-- Hornetman 16 18:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Hornetman, do you really think arguing with someone who the community trusts enough to not only give them the mop, but the keys to the supply closet is going to help you? You broke 3RR, you were warned, and you've been blocked in the past for actions extremely similar to this- no reasonable person would disagree with Deskana here. Own up to what you did, admit that you deserve what you got, and move on. It happens to us all. I recommend you do what I'm going to do this weekend - get away from the computer, grab a good book, and read it. There's a Good Book that you've probably been meaning to read more of anyway :) -- L augh! 19:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Just to inform you: I emailed Deskana and s/he said to ask on here for unblock from him/her and that's what I did.-- Hornetman 16 06:01, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
All I was thinking was to get some steam blown off, not the best way, bet that's how I did it, I removed right after I did it. And I mistyped up there, I've corrected it now.-- Hornetman 16 07:43, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
IT'S GOOD TO BE BACK!!!!
This may be a minor thing at the moment, but I fixed a typo at User:Hornetman16/9-11 that I notice when I moused the ribbon on your page. Flyguy649 talk contribs 19:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
An editor who recently registered "Hornetman16" on English Wikiquote is claiming to be you. A rather odd question about being blocked makes me a little suspicious that this may be an impersonator. Could you confirm or deny here, on your WP talk page, that you are the same person as q:User:Hornetman16? Thank you for your assistance. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 23:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Yeah I just registered.-- Hornetman 16 02:25, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Philippians 4:13, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Philippians 4:13 satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippians 4:13 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Philippians 4:13 during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Navou 06:02, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Three reasons: (1) Your edit added superfluous material to the lead, since L.'s conversion is already mentioned in the second paragraph; (2) "born-again Christian" is a problematic designation when applied to L.—it has already been discussed and rejected on the article's Talk page; see Archive 1 under "C.S. Lewis, religiously?"—and the detailed explanation of his conversion in the body of the article is in any event more informative than your boilerplate phrase; (3) you didn't bother to spell "again" correctly. Deor 20:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
...Never said they weren't. Just saying that by adding "Check Back as Matches are Announced" makes Wikipedia sound like a news site, something that Wikipedia is not. -- bulletproof 3:16 21:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Brilliant place to put the image. Thank you! I wish I'd thought of it... =David( talk)( contribs) 03:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Tough one. I think you should ask Deskana. My head's tired. I need to sleep. Night.-- bulletproof 3:16 05:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I didn't make it. You can request one here, though. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 22:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Well you want proof go to the WWE summerslam website, do you see a promo poster? Also in Wikipedia, search for jackass (series), someone also wrote that they cancelled their appearance at Summerslam. And in most Wrestling Rumor,spoiler sites, it is included. Nosaints4life 23:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Ok. I'll start replying there instead of here. — Moe ε 02:56, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Replaceable means replaceable.-- bulletproof 3:16 21:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
...for this. I'm bad at English :-) God bless you! -- Boricua e ddie 02:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
for your help with the summerslam issues -- Jwein 03:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Is TMZ.com a reliable source? Nosaints4life 18:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Why? Just like with the other big four event, SummerSlam, Survivor Series, and Royal Rumble are the article about the PPV series. Since the first WrestleMania didn't have a number, it is referred to by year just like SummerSlam (1988), Survivor Series (1987), or Royal Rumble (1988). -- bulletproof 3:16 20:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
I would also stop reverting if I were you. You don't want to end up getting blocked again for reverting against policy. Per Wikipedia:Original Research, If you don't have a source, Don't add it. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Its that time of the year again. More IPs adding Meltzer's number on the page. Could you help me watch it?-- bulletproof 3:16 23:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
See Talk:WrestleMania 23. New entry.-- bulletproof 3:16 21:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
WrestleMania 23. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a
consensus among editors. --
bulletproof
3:16
21:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
21:58, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
um the poster thats on the page is in spanish. you dont see that as i problem . cause i see that as a fake.-- Jwein 05:12, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Are you talking the Rick Achberger article? Stormin' Foreman 02:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Unless you can show me how it meets one of the criteria for speedy deletion categories, I can't speedy delete it. But you are free to nominate it for deletion at WP:IFD. Thanks. -- But| seriously| folks 20:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
TrueCRaysball |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
← Archive 2 • Archive 3 • Archive 4 → |
Jul. 2007 - Jul.2007 |
Ratings are only notable on Wikipedia when they are somehow controversial. In the case of the Manhunt 2 video game for instance, or the movie Live Free or Die Hard. Wikipedia is not a movie guide. It doesn't need to give advice to people whether a movie is suitable for their children. Also, English Wikipedia is not USA biased. The MPAA rating is of no significance to Canadians and Britons etc. I'm from the Netherlands for example. The Simpsons movie is rated All Ages here, but would that be of any use to you as an American if I added that to the article?-- Atlan ( talk) 22:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I shouldn't have said that. However, it is already stated twice in the article that the current U.S. terror level is Elevated; there's no need to state that in the lede section. Also, when you're writing edit summaries, try not to use all caps and lots of exclamation points. -- Core desat 01:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
C'mon.
This is obviously unencyclopedic, and besides no one will ever look the article up using that title. Can you request a speedy deletion for this? Adding {{ db-redirmisnomer}}, {{ db-attack}} or {{ db-test}} to the article page will do the job.
Any pages linking to this title should be fixed as well. / edgarde 01:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
no. People could see that for themselves, the dab page is not a dictionary listing, it should lead to other articles with similar names -- ʇuǝɯɯoɔ ɐqǝɟ 20:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
I was going for a second opinion like my Final Coditions stated to do if I didn't agree with something.-- Hornetman 16 22:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Hey Hornetman ... I thought long and hard about it after looking through the events on your talk page earlier this week, and figured that since I speak your language (in more ways than one), I'd be willing to informally adopt you. Seems that there's a lot of people willing to help out ... but please, let them help you. Blueboy 96 00:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to
The Rock (entertainer). For
legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
Bmg916
Speak
15:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Just so we are clear... I think this is what he was talking about. You added it again. I took it out. -- Ben 02:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
That template says yu can use it as a refrence but okay.-- Hornetman 16 23:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Edge's Belt small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:WrestleMania24logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
things like the length of non title runs arent notable by the guidelines in the Wrestling Project. If you think they should be go and plead your case. BlueShrek 21:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
I think it is a good idea to remove the logos from those pages and replace them with the posters. The logos for those three events are very repetitive and consistent year by year which is why they are used on multiple pages. However that is an unnecessary WP:FU violation. Replacing the repetitive logos with the posters for these three events is a good idea because it fixes this violation problem. Nice work. -- bulletproof 3:16 21:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Just wanted to tell you that the template you've created is up for deletion. Please do not post nonsense on Wikipedia. — Ian Lee ( Talk) 21:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Hornetman, please do not make things like this. It's a giant violation of WP:NDT. If you know something will be regarded as nonsense and you put it on wikipedia anyway, that is WP:VANDALISM, and you can and will be blocked for it -- L augh! 22:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Why is there a speedy delete on my talk page?-- Hornetman 16 23:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
When was it decided that SummerSlam, Royal Rumble and Survivor Series posters where to be moved to the infobox. Bencey 23:56, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Your userpage doesn't conform to WP:USER. Firstly, you've got a totally unsubstantiated paragraph about Chris Benoit. You've also got endless statistics about wrestling. Your userpage isn't the place for you to state your beliefs like that. Look at my userpage, or Riana's, or Daniel's. We describe a (tiny) bit about ourselves, and then mostly elabourate about who we are on Wikipedia. Yours isn't even remotely like that. You need to tone it down a lot before it's an acceptable userpage. And please, do not misrepresent what people have said. Daniel never threatened to block you if you asked him again. And yes, I have read his talkpage. That wasn't what he was saying. -- Deskana (talk) 01:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Could you get the word out especially to Daniel?-- Hornetman 16 01:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Let Daniel know since he's the only one that can okay it and undo the protect from edit thing.-- Hornetman 16 01:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
You need a fair use rationale for every use, along with the copyright tag, otherwise it'll be deleted. "To the uploader: please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use, as described on Wikipedia:Image description page, as well as the source of the work and copyright information." -- Dark Falls talk 02:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
People have been known to survive days, even weeks, even longer after being "taken off life support", which usually means being taken off a ventilator. I agree that he's dying and may already be dead but without an official announcement, adding in a date of death goes against WP:ATT - without attribution it shouldn't be in the encyclopedia, and has the potential of making Wikipedia look bad. -- Charlene 15:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
I can't believe I am going through this again. Yes, people who are not signed in can prod articles. First of all, quote me chapter and verse of where they can't according to wiki rules. Second, even if you can, the fact that the prod went through and was listed shows that people who are not signed in can prod. Deal with the issues brought up in the prod and whether or not they are valid and not who initiated it. 172.150.83.110 11:06, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
As you have already nominated the picture [1], and brought the issue up at WP:PW [2], how about you leave the picture on the article until a consensus has been reached, and if the consensus is to delete it then feel free to do so. But until there is consensus it should stay in the articles it is being used in so those voting on it can see it in context, as your deletion claim does state "No longer relevant to anything.", and keep the picture in place will allow those voting to view its relevance. Darrenhusted 12:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
The fact of the matter is that these lists of reigns by combined lengths are completely unnecessary. The reason for that is that these lists have already been integrated within the articles of lists of reigns by length. For example, the same list found at List of top ECW World Champions by combined length is already found at the bottom of List of ECW World Championship reigns by length. It just seems redundant to have two articles of lists when you can have both lists in one article. It is also obvious trivia. -- bulletproof 3:16 16:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Free use is free of all copyright, fair use still has copyright. Free is preferred. If you have a problem take it to a talk page, don't keep reverting endlessly, you are past 3RR with regards to that page, you revert one more time and I'll report you. As it stand if you are willing to listen then I won't file a report, however other could. Darrenhusted 17:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
I don;t think it's possible for any free use to exsist since it's a copyrighted look-- Hornetman 16 17:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Cease reverting at WWE Championship. You are in violation of the three revert rule. Further reverts will result in a block for edit warring and disruption. -- Deskana (talk) 17:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
No that was Darrenhusted that warned you 5 times. He can't block you on the spot because he isn't an admin. However, Deskana is and he can.-- bulletproof 3:16 17:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Stop, please. Edit warring is bad enough. Edit warring in violation of Resolution:Licensing policy, Wikipedia:Non-free content, and Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria is a completely unacceptable. ElinorD (talk) 17:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for violating the three-revert rule on WWE Championship. Your block will expire in 48 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Deskana (talk) 17:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC) |
TrueCRaysball/Archive ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I doing what I thought was right for Wikipedia I guess I was proven wrong (if you'll read below), so requesting you assume good faith one last time.
Decline reason:
You were validly blocked for violating the three revert rule and you're lucky your block was not extended given your original response. I think you need to sit this one out. WjB scribe 20:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I've tried explaining but you won't let me!-- Hornetman 16 18:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
I was trying an Idea. I wasn't try to edit war.-- Hornetman 16 18:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
I think you need to read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule as well, Hornetman. ElinorD (talk) 18:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
He violated the WP:3RR blocking policy by blocking me for more that 24 hours.-- Hornetman 16 18:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
So he get away with it?! That's BS right there.-- Hornetman 16 18:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Hornetman, do you really think arguing with someone who the community trusts enough to not only give them the mop, but the keys to the supply closet is going to help you? You broke 3RR, you were warned, and you've been blocked in the past for actions extremely similar to this- no reasonable person would disagree with Deskana here. Own up to what you did, admit that you deserve what you got, and move on. It happens to us all. I recommend you do what I'm going to do this weekend - get away from the computer, grab a good book, and read it. There's a Good Book that you've probably been meaning to read more of anyway :) -- L augh! 19:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Just to inform you: I emailed Deskana and s/he said to ask on here for unblock from him/her and that's what I did.-- Hornetman 16 06:01, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
All I was thinking was to get some steam blown off, not the best way, bet that's how I did it, I removed right after I did it. And I mistyped up there, I've corrected it now.-- Hornetman 16 07:43, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
IT'S GOOD TO BE BACK!!!!
This may be a minor thing at the moment, but I fixed a typo at User:Hornetman16/9-11 that I notice when I moused the ribbon on your page. Flyguy649 talk contribs 19:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
An editor who recently registered "Hornetman16" on English Wikiquote is claiming to be you. A rather odd question about being blocked makes me a little suspicious that this may be an impersonator. Could you confirm or deny here, on your WP talk page, that you are the same person as q:User:Hornetman16? Thank you for your assistance. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 23:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Yeah I just registered.-- Hornetman 16 02:25, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Philippians 4:13, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Philippians 4:13 satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippians 4:13 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Philippians 4:13 during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Navou 06:02, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Three reasons: (1) Your edit added superfluous material to the lead, since L.'s conversion is already mentioned in the second paragraph; (2) "born-again Christian" is a problematic designation when applied to L.—it has already been discussed and rejected on the article's Talk page; see Archive 1 under "C.S. Lewis, religiously?"—and the detailed explanation of his conversion in the body of the article is in any event more informative than your boilerplate phrase; (3) you didn't bother to spell "again" correctly. Deor 20:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
...Never said they weren't. Just saying that by adding "Check Back as Matches are Announced" makes Wikipedia sound like a news site, something that Wikipedia is not. -- bulletproof 3:16 21:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Brilliant place to put the image. Thank you! I wish I'd thought of it... =David( talk)( contribs) 03:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Tough one. I think you should ask Deskana. My head's tired. I need to sleep. Night.-- bulletproof 3:16 05:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I didn't make it. You can request one here, though. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 22:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Well you want proof go to the WWE summerslam website, do you see a promo poster? Also in Wikipedia, search for jackass (series), someone also wrote that they cancelled their appearance at Summerslam. And in most Wrestling Rumor,spoiler sites, it is included. Nosaints4life 23:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Ok. I'll start replying there instead of here. — Moe ε 02:56, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Replaceable means replaceable.-- bulletproof 3:16 21:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
...for this. I'm bad at English :-) God bless you! -- Boricua e ddie 02:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
for your help with the summerslam issues -- Jwein 03:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Is TMZ.com a reliable source? Nosaints4life 18:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Why? Just like with the other big four event, SummerSlam, Survivor Series, and Royal Rumble are the article about the PPV series. Since the first WrestleMania didn't have a number, it is referred to by year just like SummerSlam (1988), Survivor Series (1987), or Royal Rumble (1988). -- bulletproof 3:16 20:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
I would also stop reverting if I were you. You don't want to end up getting blocked again for reverting against policy. Per Wikipedia:Original Research, If you don't have a source, Don't add it. -- bulletproof 3:16 20:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Its that time of the year again. More IPs adding Meltzer's number on the page. Could you help me watch it?-- bulletproof 3:16 23:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
See Talk:WrestleMania 23. New entry.-- bulletproof 3:16 21:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
WrestleMania 23. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a
consensus among editors. --
bulletproof
3:16
21:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
21:58, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
um the poster thats on the page is in spanish. you dont see that as i problem . cause i see that as a fake.-- Jwein 05:12, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Are you talking the Rick Achberger article? Stormin' Foreman 02:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Unless you can show me how it meets one of the criteria for speedy deletion categories, I can't speedy delete it. But you are free to nominate it for deletion at WP:IFD. Thanks. -- But| seriously| folks 20:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)