Hello, TrayWitTheMac11, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as TrayWitTheMac11, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Largoplazo ( talk) 00:28, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of TrayWitTheMac11
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on TrayWitTheMac11, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Largoplazo ( talk) 00:28, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate
your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself. Creating an
autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on
writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for
articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see
Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see:
Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you.
Largoplazo (
talk)
00:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry Tray, but you may not be so famous as you think. (Also, the slur about racisim as a motivation for deletion. Get real. I expect that will require an apology.) At any rate, I try to explain my speedy deletions thusly. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Instagram and Youtube serve more as promotional venues than reliable sources. You may find this tool useful for finding sources: Google custom search. It would have been better to use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process. That would have created a Draft article. That way you could have removed the promotional content before it entered main space-- hence the deletion under WP:CSD#G11. You may find this tool useful for finding sources: Google custom search. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources. Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. Hope this helps. -- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 21:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a
speedy deletion tag from
TrayWitTheMac11, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the
talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
Largoplazo (
talk)
01:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove
speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with
TrayWitTheMac11. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the
talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.
Largoplazo (
talk)
02:44, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your threat of legal action. The thread is
Legal threat by TrayWitTheMac11.
Largoplazo (
talk)
03:24, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of TrayWitTheMac11 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TrayWitTheMac11 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TrayWitTheMac11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo ( talk) 03:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Jayron 32 03:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
i didnt mean any harm i agree to play nice
Decline reason:
You must unconditionally withdraw your legal threat. Additionally, you must explain why your previous edits were completely inappropriate, and describe how your future edits will be significantly different. Yamla ( talk) 22:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I withdraw my legal threat im sorry will never happen again please unblock me i was just upset had bad day my grandma died i should have never said that i truely apogize for my actions will never happen again guys, i ment no harm was just typing its been a year
Decline reason:
Duplicate request Amortias ( T)( C) 20:43, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I withdraw my legal threat im sorry will never happen again please unblock me i was just upset had bad day my grandma died i should have never said that i truely apogize for my actions will never happen again guys, i ment no harm was just typing its been a year
Decline reason:
Same as above... duplicate request that doesn't explain anything in depth. only ( talk) 04:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
COMMENT-- I'm sorry for your loss. Thank you for withdrawing the legal threat. Unfortunately, there are other areas of concern. Per Yamla above, " you must explain why your previous edits were completely inappropriate, and describe how your future edits will be significantly different. Thanks -- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 21:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I Truley apogize from my heart and my pervious actions were very inapproppriate because I made a legal theart to a wiki staff member that was very wrong and absurb and should have never been made. In future reference I will treat everyone and everybody with respect period and specially one wikipedia this site which I love and enjoy so much and learning from this site with school and for my business. I will never threat the staff in that energy again and farther more will defienly talk and treat people with respect in a very postive manor as should people be treated and not be disrespected in that manor. You will recieve nothing but postivey from me and my future edits will be significantly difference from before as I learned I have made huge mistake I truly apolgize for my actions that I have made to cause this I will not treat or make legal treats to anyone. thanks very sorry guys TrayWitTheMac11 ( talk) 17:43, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Duplicate request SQL Query me! 22:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I Truley apogize from my heart and my pervious actions were very inapproppriate because I made a legal theart to a wiki staff member that was very wrong and absurb and should have never been made. In future reference I will treat everyone and everybody with respect period and specially one wikipedia this site which I love and enjoy so much and learning from this site with school and for my business. I will never threat the staff in that energy again and farther more will defienly talk and treat people with respect in a very postive manor as should people be treated and not be disrespected in that manor. You will recieve nothing but postivey from me and my future edits will be significantly difference from before as I learned I have made huge mistake I truly apolgize for my actions that I have made to cause this I will not treat or make legal treats to anyone. thanks very sorry guys (UTC)
Decline reason:
Declined.
Stophatenlilbro (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki) is using a phone on the same IPv6 /64 address block as TrayWitTheMac11 who is using a laptop/desktop. Additionally, there is another phone editing anonymously that would be considered
IP socking. No one else is using the /64 address block. Block evasion.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
19:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are not likely to be unblocked in order to allow you to use Wikipedia to publicise or promote yourself or your work, or to create a page to serve your "fans", as you have in the past said was your intention. Therefore, your most likely chance of being unblocked is if you indicate that you do not intend to write about yourself again, and if you can give an indication of some editing you would like to do on other topics, unrelated to yourself. As has been explained to you already, by more than one person, writing about oneself is discouraged. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 21:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
First Off StopHatenlilbro is not my account this accont belongs to one of my friends that was just over my home for a day and was on wiki i guess and did a change so i dont understad nd why you guys would block bello from wiki he has nonthing to do with what i have going on that is not right that is discrimination farther more i been apogzie for my actions and withdrew mt inaaproate comment so im not understanding while i am still blocked seems like you gusy are ding this on purpose and to be smart so in the case and would have to be contacting a lawyer based unpon wiki discimination policeys theres no reson to have me blocked on a the wiki site i csn not vause any harm to anybody im not no hacker i just want to be able to use wiki like everybody else and view articles amd i just hired a new writer to rewrite my article to fit wiki standards which just cost me alot of money and you guys are actling like this with me im doing this in order to use Wikipedia to publicise my work with valid sources this page is being created to serve my fans which im stating " I will not intend on writeing or promoting myself on wiki as i have in the past IUnderstand wiki policies and procuders " thats why i hired a wiki professonal writer to write for me and do everything in the write format and standard as you guys stated i follow rules and i feel like because we had one bad fall out you guys are judging me upon that, that is not my chacter at all i just dont understand why you guys keep doing wrong things to me for no apparent reason why wold i make another account when i been talking to you guys on this one perfectly fine and been waiting patiencely for a response back but u guys can reply back faster and say im trying to use another wiki account thats absurb makes no sense at all the was a one time thing so your saying no one is allowed in my home to use wiki or there account will be block never heard of that at all seems like you guys are beinh very rude and upsurb about my account and me using wiki im lettinh you guys know that this will go so far before u guys even figure out your next step i wont hesitate to involve the press, news articles, and one of the best discrimation lawyers here! so once again please explain to me while you still want to have my account blocked when i withdrew everyhing you guys asked me and apolgized! TrayWitTheMac11 ( talk) 20:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since yet again you have threatened legal action ("before u guys even figure out your next step i wont hesitate to involve the press, news articles, and one of the best discrimation lawyers here!", I am removing talk page access. You may file a request to have your account unblocked at WP:UTRS RickinBaltimore ( talk) 20:43, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- "...was a one time thing". That's funny, he seems to have filed his unblock request from your home today (same exact IP) before you did. What's more, you both have the same
competency issues and no admin in their right mind would unblock someone writing as both of you are.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #20309 was submitted on Jan 13, 2018 01:54:54. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 01:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #20310 was submitted on Jan 13, 2018 02:29:49. This review is now closed.
Hello, TrayWitTheMac11, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as TrayWitTheMac11, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Largoplazo ( talk) 00:28, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of TrayWitTheMac11
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on TrayWitTheMac11, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Largoplazo ( talk) 00:28, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate
your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself. Creating an
autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on
writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for
articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see
Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see:
Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you.
Largoplazo (
talk)
00:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry Tray, but you may not be so famous as you think. (Also, the slur about racisim as a motivation for deletion. Get real. I expect that will require an apology.) At any rate, I try to explain my speedy deletions thusly. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Instagram and Youtube serve more as promotional venues than reliable sources. You may find this tool useful for finding sources: Google custom search. It would have been better to use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process. That would have created a Draft article. That way you could have removed the promotional content before it entered main space-- hence the deletion under WP:CSD#G11. You may find this tool useful for finding sources: Google custom search. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources. Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. Hope this helps. -- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 21:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a
speedy deletion tag from
TrayWitTheMac11, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the
talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
Largoplazo (
talk)
01:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove
speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with
TrayWitTheMac11. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the
talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.
Largoplazo (
talk)
02:44, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your threat of legal action. The thread is
Legal threat by TrayWitTheMac11.
Largoplazo (
talk)
03:24, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of TrayWitTheMac11 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TrayWitTheMac11 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TrayWitTheMac11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo ( talk) 03:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Jayron 32 03:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
i didnt mean any harm i agree to play nice
Decline reason:
You must unconditionally withdraw your legal threat. Additionally, you must explain why your previous edits were completely inappropriate, and describe how your future edits will be significantly different. Yamla ( talk) 22:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I withdraw my legal threat im sorry will never happen again please unblock me i was just upset had bad day my grandma died i should have never said that i truely apogize for my actions will never happen again guys, i ment no harm was just typing its been a year
Decline reason:
Duplicate request Amortias ( T)( C) 20:43, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I withdraw my legal threat im sorry will never happen again please unblock me i was just upset had bad day my grandma died i should have never said that i truely apogize for my actions will never happen again guys, i ment no harm was just typing its been a year
Decline reason:
Same as above... duplicate request that doesn't explain anything in depth. only ( talk) 04:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
COMMENT-- I'm sorry for your loss. Thank you for withdrawing the legal threat. Unfortunately, there are other areas of concern. Per Yamla above, " you must explain why your previous edits were completely inappropriate, and describe how your future edits will be significantly different. Thanks -- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 21:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I Truley apogize from my heart and my pervious actions were very inapproppriate because I made a legal theart to a wiki staff member that was very wrong and absurb and should have never been made. In future reference I will treat everyone and everybody with respect period and specially one wikipedia this site which I love and enjoy so much and learning from this site with school and for my business. I will never threat the staff in that energy again and farther more will defienly talk and treat people with respect in a very postive manor as should people be treated and not be disrespected in that manor. You will recieve nothing but postivey from me and my future edits will be significantly difference from before as I learned I have made huge mistake I truly apolgize for my actions that I have made to cause this I will not treat or make legal treats to anyone. thanks very sorry guys TrayWitTheMac11 ( talk) 17:43, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Duplicate request SQL Query me! 22:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I Truley apogize from my heart and my pervious actions were very inapproppriate because I made a legal theart to a wiki staff member that was very wrong and absurb and should have never been made. In future reference I will treat everyone and everybody with respect period and specially one wikipedia this site which I love and enjoy so much and learning from this site with school and for my business. I will never threat the staff in that energy again and farther more will defienly talk and treat people with respect in a very postive manor as should people be treated and not be disrespected in that manor. You will recieve nothing but postivey from me and my future edits will be significantly difference from before as I learned I have made huge mistake I truly apolgize for my actions that I have made to cause this I will not treat or make legal treats to anyone. thanks very sorry guys (UTC)
Decline reason:
Declined.
Stophatenlilbro (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki) is using a phone on the same IPv6 /64 address block as TrayWitTheMac11 who is using a laptop/desktop. Additionally, there is another phone editing anonymously that would be considered
IP socking. No one else is using the /64 address block. Block evasion.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
19:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are not likely to be unblocked in order to allow you to use Wikipedia to publicise or promote yourself or your work, or to create a page to serve your "fans", as you have in the past said was your intention. Therefore, your most likely chance of being unblocked is if you indicate that you do not intend to write about yourself again, and if you can give an indication of some editing you would like to do on other topics, unrelated to yourself. As has been explained to you already, by more than one person, writing about oneself is discouraged. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 21:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
First Off StopHatenlilbro is not my account this accont belongs to one of my friends that was just over my home for a day and was on wiki i guess and did a change so i dont understad nd why you guys would block bello from wiki he has nonthing to do with what i have going on that is not right that is discrimination farther more i been apogzie for my actions and withdrew mt inaaproate comment so im not understanding while i am still blocked seems like you gusy are ding this on purpose and to be smart so in the case and would have to be contacting a lawyer based unpon wiki discimination policeys theres no reson to have me blocked on a the wiki site i csn not vause any harm to anybody im not no hacker i just want to be able to use wiki like everybody else and view articles amd i just hired a new writer to rewrite my article to fit wiki standards which just cost me alot of money and you guys are actling like this with me im doing this in order to use Wikipedia to publicise my work with valid sources this page is being created to serve my fans which im stating " I will not intend on writeing or promoting myself on wiki as i have in the past IUnderstand wiki policies and procuders " thats why i hired a wiki professonal writer to write for me and do everything in the write format and standard as you guys stated i follow rules and i feel like because we had one bad fall out you guys are judging me upon that, that is not my chacter at all i just dont understand why you guys keep doing wrong things to me for no apparent reason why wold i make another account when i been talking to you guys on this one perfectly fine and been waiting patiencely for a response back but u guys can reply back faster and say im trying to use another wiki account thats absurb makes no sense at all the was a one time thing so your saying no one is allowed in my home to use wiki or there account will be block never heard of that at all seems like you guys are beinh very rude and upsurb about my account and me using wiki im lettinh you guys know that this will go so far before u guys even figure out your next step i wont hesitate to involve the press, news articles, and one of the best discrimation lawyers here! so once again please explain to me while you still want to have my account blocked when i withdrew everyhing you guys asked me and apolgized! TrayWitTheMac11 ( talk) 20:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since yet again you have threatened legal action ("before u guys even figure out your next step i wont hesitate to involve the press, news articles, and one of the best discrimation lawyers here!", I am removing talk page access. You may file a request to have your account unblocked at WP:UTRS RickinBaltimore ( talk) 20:43, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- "...was a one time thing". That's funny, he seems to have filed his unblock request from your home today (same exact IP) before you did. What's more, you both have the same
competency issues and no admin in their right mind would unblock someone writing as both of you are.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #20309 was submitted on Jan 13, 2018 01:54:54. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 01:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
TrayWitTheMac11 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #20310 was submitted on Jan 13, 2018 02:29:49. This review is now closed.