|
Lightoil ( talk) 07:54, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
You recently moved Draft:Zhou Xinyu to MediaWiki talk:Gate. Please make sure you don't do this in the future, as this needed to be cleaned up through a page swap, and the move was completely unnecessary. Before doing so again, please make sure you request assistance. There shouldn't be a reason to move a draft to MediaWiki talk namespace. EggRoll97 ( talk) 02:56, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Wein, meine Liebe. Wein. Totheairport ( talk) 03:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
was ich gemacht hab, hab ich gemacht Totheairport ( talk) 03:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
didnt see what u said pussio. leave this page alone. Totheairport ( talk) 03:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
VANDAL??? ME??? you're the fucking vandal you ugly fuck face prick.
deleting all my posts without reason on my OWN talk page repeatedly then blanking the page i spent hours creating because the original was SHIT.
Totheairport (
talk)
03:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
now that's over. time to go back to my regular copyediting schedule... fucking pissed me off. Totheairport ( talk) 03:59, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
User talk pages are subject to the general userpage guidelines on handling inappropriate content (see User pages § Handling inappropriate content).
While the purpose of article talk pages is to discuss the content of articles, the purpose of user talk pages is to draw the attention or discuss the edits of a user. Wikipedia is not a social networking site, and all discussion should ultimately be directed solely toward the improvement of the encyclopedia. User talk pages must serve their primary purpose, which is to make communication and collaboration among editors easier. Editors who refuse to use their talk page for these purposes are violating the spirit of the talk page guidelines, and are not acting collaboratively.
The length of user talk pages, and the need for archiving, is left up to each editor's own discretion.
Although archiving is preferred, users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages. Users may also remove some content in archiving. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user; this is true whether the removal was manual or automatic, and includes both registered and unregistered users. Some new users believe they can hide critical comments by deleting them. This is not true: Such comments can always be retrieved from the page history.
There are certain types of notices that users may not remove from their own talk pages, such as declined unblock requests and speedy deletion tags (see User pages § Removal of comments, notices, and warnings for full details).
User talk pages are almost never deleted, although a courtesy blanking may be requested. Totheairport ( talk) 04:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
LIMBO! - Nature Totheairport ( talk) 04:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Tamzin[
cetacean needed (they|xe|she)
04:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Totheairport ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I meant no harm. Genuinely. That man who kept undoing all my talk page edits enraged me. He deleted everything on my OWN talk page numerous times for no reason. I only wanted to do general copyediting. My first article was to be about Zhou Xinyu, and instead of improving the existing draft, I sought to create a better one, which I realise was wrong. Seriously, I apologize from the bottom of my heart for any damage I have caused, it wasn't meant to be this way. I am just an average boy, I am not a vandal. I'm terribly, terribly sorry. Please review my request. Totheairport ( talk) 04:18, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have made no constructive edits, and you just edited someone else's post. I am declining your unblock request. PhilKnight ( talk) 10:04, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Totheairport ( talk) 04:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
I'm not an admin, but let me get this straight. First of all, looking at your contributions, I do not see any positive copyedits you've made. On the draft Draft:Zhou Xinyu, you've either deleted content or blanked it whole, hijacked the draft to an Icelandic singer, or straight up vandalized the draft. You've also moved the draft multiple times without explanation. Second, judging by the state of your talk page, it clearly shows that you are WP:NOTHERE. Moreover, among the words that you've said to NmWTfs85lXusaybq, this and this is a clear violation of WP:NPA and will not be tolerated. Also, you said that your talk page is getting deleted for no reason by NmWTfs85lXusaybq. If so, did you think that getting revenge and blanking out that user's talk page was a good idea [1]? 🛧 Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 06:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
@ Tamzin: As this vandal misused their privilege to edit others' comment here again during their block, their talk page access should be revoked. NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk) 09:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Avoid the word "vandal". In particular, this word should not be used to refer to any contributor in good standing nor to any edits that might have been made in good faith. This is because if the edits were made in good faith, they are not vandalism. Assume good faith yourself; instead of calling the person who made the edits a "vandal", discuss your concerns with them. Comment on the content and substance of the edits, instead of making personal attacks. Totheairport ( talk) 04:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Totheairport ( talk) 10:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
i fear my good intentions have been misconstried.... im sorry all ... Totheairport ( talk) 05:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
are we just not going to do anything about that guy who kept vandalising my talk page. Two wrongs don't make a right.
talk about double standards.
Totheairport (
talk)
10:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Totheairport ( talk) 10:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a Confirmed
sockpuppet of
Sunflowasutra. --
Yamla (
talk)
12:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Kenmafu, my dearest Brian Freeloveforall ( talk) 07:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Lightoil ( talk) 07:54, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
You recently moved Draft:Zhou Xinyu to MediaWiki talk:Gate. Please make sure you don't do this in the future, as this needed to be cleaned up through a page swap, and the move was completely unnecessary. Before doing so again, please make sure you request assistance. There shouldn't be a reason to move a draft to MediaWiki talk namespace. EggRoll97 ( talk) 02:56, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Wein, meine Liebe. Wein. Totheairport ( talk) 03:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
was ich gemacht hab, hab ich gemacht Totheairport ( talk) 03:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
didnt see what u said pussio. leave this page alone. Totheairport ( talk) 03:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
VANDAL??? ME??? you're the fucking vandal you ugly fuck face prick.
deleting all my posts without reason on my OWN talk page repeatedly then blanking the page i spent hours creating because the original was SHIT.
Totheairport (
talk)
03:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
now that's over. time to go back to my regular copyediting schedule... fucking pissed me off. Totheairport ( talk) 03:59, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
User talk pages are subject to the general userpage guidelines on handling inappropriate content (see User pages § Handling inappropriate content).
While the purpose of article talk pages is to discuss the content of articles, the purpose of user talk pages is to draw the attention or discuss the edits of a user. Wikipedia is not a social networking site, and all discussion should ultimately be directed solely toward the improvement of the encyclopedia. User talk pages must serve their primary purpose, which is to make communication and collaboration among editors easier. Editors who refuse to use their talk page for these purposes are violating the spirit of the talk page guidelines, and are not acting collaboratively.
The length of user talk pages, and the need for archiving, is left up to each editor's own discretion.
Although archiving is preferred, users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages. Users may also remove some content in archiving. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user; this is true whether the removal was manual or automatic, and includes both registered and unregistered users. Some new users believe they can hide critical comments by deleting them. This is not true: Such comments can always be retrieved from the page history.
There are certain types of notices that users may not remove from their own talk pages, such as declined unblock requests and speedy deletion tags (see User pages § Removal of comments, notices, and warnings for full details).
User talk pages are almost never deleted, although a courtesy blanking may be requested. Totheairport ( talk) 04:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
LIMBO! - Nature Totheairport ( talk) 04:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Tamzin[
cetacean needed (they|xe|she)
04:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Totheairport ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I meant no harm. Genuinely. That man who kept undoing all my talk page edits enraged me. He deleted everything on my OWN talk page numerous times for no reason. I only wanted to do general copyediting. My first article was to be about Zhou Xinyu, and instead of improving the existing draft, I sought to create a better one, which I realise was wrong. Seriously, I apologize from the bottom of my heart for any damage I have caused, it wasn't meant to be this way. I am just an average boy, I am not a vandal. I'm terribly, terribly sorry. Please review my request. Totheairport ( talk) 04:18, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have made no constructive edits, and you just edited someone else's post. I am declining your unblock request. PhilKnight ( talk) 10:04, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Totheairport ( talk) 04:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
I'm not an admin, but let me get this straight. First of all, looking at your contributions, I do not see any positive copyedits you've made. On the draft Draft:Zhou Xinyu, you've either deleted content or blanked it whole, hijacked the draft to an Icelandic singer, or straight up vandalized the draft. You've also moved the draft multiple times without explanation. Second, judging by the state of your talk page, it clearly shows that you are WP:NOTHERE. Moreover, among the words that you've said to NmWTfs85lXusaybq, this and this is a clear violation of WP:NPA and will not be tolerated. Also, you said that your talk page is getting deleted for no reason by NmWTfs85lXusaybq. If so, did you think that getting revenge and blanking out that user's talk page was a good idea [1]? 🛧 Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 06:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
@ Tamzin: As this vandal misused their privilege to edit others' comment here again during their block, their talk page access should be revoked. NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk) 09:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Avoid the word "vandal". In particular, this word should not be used to refer to any contributor in good standing nor to any edits that might have been made in good faith. This is because if the edits were made in good faith, they are not vandalism. Assume good faith yourself; instead of calling the person who made the edits a "vandal", discuss your concerns with them. Comment on the content and substance of the edits, instead of making personal attacks. Totheairport ( talk) 04:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Totheairport ( talk) 10:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
i fear my good intentions have been misconstried.... im sorry all ... Totheairport ( talk) 05:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
are we just not going to do anything about that guy who kept vandalising my talk page. Two wrongs don't make a right.
talk about double standards.
Totheairport (
talk)
10:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Totheairport ( talk) 10:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a Confirmed
sockpuppet of
Sunflowasutra. --
Yamla (
talk)
12:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Kenmafu, my dearest Brian Freeloveforall ( talk) 07:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)