|
Hello! Total-MAdMaN,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the
Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!
Charles (
talk)
19:55, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar | |
I keep bumping into you around the newbies' contributions page and you are one of the best newbies I've seen in the time I've been here! Here's a barnstar for your great work! AndieM (Leave a message!) 19:44, 27 March 2012 (UTC) |
Hey, I seen you've made a lot of reports at WP:COIN lately. I haven't looked into many of them but it looks like they're all great cases for the noticeboard. Keep up the great work! OlYeller21 Talktome 17:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your reports to UAA Hghyux ( talk to me)( talk to others) 14:18, 17 April 2012 (UTC) |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Congratulations, Total-MAdMaN, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia!
Thank you for your efforts to keep the encyclopedia well-referenced and free of vandalism. Keep up the good work! Maryana (WMF) ( talk) 18:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC) |
Please stop reverting my last contribution to this article. "...that has been existed" is not an English sentence. Morgan Katarn ( talk) 15:13, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
I already told you to stop reverting some of my useful edits. If you continue doing so, I'll be slowly forced to inform an admin about your behavior. Just stop! Master Katarn ( talk) 13:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, you've marked the vale recreation fc article that it needs additional verification, what does need additional? I have quoted a number of external websites. Thanks ( Darrylgsy ( talk) 18:55, 11 June 2012 (UTC)).
Please do not add a BLPPROD tag if any reference, reliable or unreliable, is present in the article. Jake LeDoux did have an IMDb reference. While this is an unreliable ref, it is a ref that sources statements made in the article. A more appropriate tag would have been {{ BLP IMDB refimprove}}. Bgwhite ( talk) 07:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Dear Sir We tried to publish an article on NGO (Foundation for the Future) but it was blocked by Wikipedia. We don´t know the reason and we don´t really know how to publish it. Could you help us or explain us what we are doing wrong? Best regards, Dima, http://foundationforfuture.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dima123 ( talk • contribs) 11:30, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that you tagged Netflix machine for speedy deletion. I have removed the tag from the article because it does not meet the criterion specified. Please fully read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion before tagging articles for speedy deletion. "Neologism" is not a valid criteria for deletion. elektrik SHOOS ( talk) 19:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Can you check the spelling on that one? I can't find an account to consider blocking. -- Orange Mike | Talk 20:43, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Poppyuk is new, and not aware of the rules. I think it would be better to politely point out on the talk page what belongs in the user page, instead of going the CSD route.-- SPhilbrick (Talk) 12:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Please stop adding deletion tags to this article and please stop controlling my contributions. If you continue, adding deletion tags to worked out articles, I will report you for vandalism and you will get blocked from editing the Wikipedia. So please stop! M0RG@N ( talk) 22:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
This article is exisiting since January 2012. I see no reason why you added a deletion tag. Just because you won't aggree with that article doesn't mean that this article should get removed. It's a well worked out article and I'm totally satisfied with it. So please stop doing so! M0RG@N ( talk) 11:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. I have started an ANI discussion regarding Morgan and his disruptive behavior. You have spent a signficant amount of time dealing with him, so your thoughts would be welcome. Some guy ( talk) 20:55, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages. I noticed that you are not marking some of the pages you've reviewed as patrolled. Please do remember to click the 'mark this page as patrolled' link at the bottom of the new page if you have performed the standard patrolling tasks. Where appropriate, doing so saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks again for volunteering your time at the new pages patrol project. -- Luke (Talk) 23:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
Hello! Total-MAdMaN,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the
Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!
Charles (
talk)
19:55, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar | |
I keep bumping into you around the newbies' contributions page and you are one of the best newbies I've seen in the time I've been here! Here's a barnstar for your great work! AndieM (Leave a message!) 19:44, 27 March 2012 (UTC) |
Hey, I seen you've made a lot of reports at WP:COIN lately. I haven't looked into many of them but it looks like they're all great cases for the noticeboard. Keep up the great work! OlYeller21 Talktome 17:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your reports to UAA Hghyux ( talk to me)( talk to others) 14:18, 17 April 2012 (UTC) |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Congratulations, Total-MAdMaN, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia!
Thank you for your efforts to keep the encyclopedia well-referenced and free of vandalism. Keep up the good work! Maryana (WMF) ( talk) 18:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC) |
Please stop reverting my last contribution to this article. "...that has been existed" is not an English sentence. Morgan Katarn ( talk) 15:13, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
I already told you to stop reverting some of my useful edits. If you continue doing so, I'll be slowly forced to inform an admin about your behavior. Just stop! Master Katarn ( talk) 13:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, you've marked the vale recreation fc article that it needs additional verification, what does need additional? I have quoted a number of external websites. Thanks ( Darrylgsy ( talk) 18:55, 11 June 2012 (UTC)).
Please do not add a BLPPROD tag if any reference, reliable or unreliable, is present in the article. Jake LeDoux did have an IMDb reference. While this is an unreliable ref, it is a ref that sources statements made in the article. A more appropriate tag would have been {{ BLP IMDB refimprove}}. Bgwhite ( talk) 07:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Dear Sir We tried to publish an article on NGO (Foundation for the Future) but it was blocked by Wikipedia. We don´t know the reason and we don´t really know how to publish it. Could you help us or explain us what we are doing wrong? Best regards, Dima, http://foundationforfuture.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dima123 ( talk • contribs) 11:30, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that you tagged Netflix machine for speedy deletion. I have removed the tag from the article because it does not meet the criterion specified. Please fully read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion before tagging articles for speedy deletion. "Neologism" is not a valid criteria for deletion. elektrik SHOOS ( talk) 19:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Can you check the spelling on that one? I can't find an account to consider blocking. -- Orange Mike | Talk 20:43, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Poppyuk is new, and not aware of the rules. I think it would be better to politely point out on the talk page what belongs in the user page, instead of going the CSD route.-- SPhilbrick (Talk) 12:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Please stop adding deletion tags to this article and please stop controlling my contributions. If you continue, adding deletion tags to worked out articles, I will report you for vandalism and you will get blocked from editing the Wikipedia. So please stop! M0RG@N ( talk) 22:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
This article is exisiting since January 2012. I see no reason why you added a deletion tag. Just because you won't aggree with that article doesn't mean that this article should get removed. It's a well worked out article and I'm totally satisfied with it. So please stop doing so! M0RG@N ( talk) 11:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. I have started an ANI discussion regarding Morgan and his disruptive behavior. You have spent a signficant amount of time dealing with him, so your thoughts would be welcome. Some guy ( talk) 20:55, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages. I noticed that you are not marking some of the pages you've reviewed as patrolled. Please do remember to click the 'mark this page as patrolled' link at the bottom of the new page if you have performed the standard patrolling tasks. Where appropriate, doing so saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks again for volunteering your time at the new pages patrol project. -- Luke (Talk) 23:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)