Welcome!
Hello, Torsten Wittmann (Karlsruhe), and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Bearian (
talk)
17:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Another editor seems to have fixed the probem. Bearian ( talk) 16:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Karin Gayer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Madcoverboy ( talk) 18:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Bonjour. As-tu vu l'article sur le roman court de Ebner? Peut-être tu pourrais le traduire en anglais? Salutations -- Svartvicks ( talk) 20:40, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Torsten, sorry for my delay in replying. I'll be happy to help with Hominid, and look forward to learning more about Ebner and his work. I'm quite impressed with the dedication displayed by you and other editors throughout the Wikipedia projects to improve article's dedicated to this specific author, who is not well known in the English-speaking world -- yet. If you don't mind, I'll add suggestions/comments for further improvements on the article's talk page while I copy-edit. María ( habla con migo) 13:39, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Torsten, good to hear from you again! Hominid will need some more work before it becomes a GA. Here are a few suggestions:
Hope these suggestions help. If you need another look, just let me know. María ( habla con migo) 13:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Klaus Ebner for a good article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets good article criteria. Thank you:)-- Ice Sea ( talk) 15:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello Torsten. Yes I am willing to help. Buy I will have to do it slowly as I don't have much time lately. Meursault2004 ( talk) 23:57, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Fences& Windows 21:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Hominid (novel) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Hominid (novel) for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells ( talk) 21:08, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ingrid Reichel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingrid Reichel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk ( talk) 20:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Torsten Wittmann (Karlsruhe), and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Bearian (
talk)
17:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Another editor seems to have fixed the probem. Bearian ( talk) 16:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Karin Gayer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Madcoverboy ( talk) 18:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Bonjour. As-tu vu l'article sur le roman court de Ebner? Peut-être tu pourrais le traduire en anglais? Salutations -- Svartvicks ( talk) 20:40, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Torsten, sorry for my delay in replying. I'll be happy to help with Hominid, and look forward to learning more about Ebner and his work. I'm quite impressed with the dedication displayed by you and other editors throughout the Wikipedia projects to improve article's dedicated to this specific author, who is not well known in the English-speaking world -- yet. If you don't mind, I'll add suggestions/comments for further improvements on the article's talk page while I copy-edit. María ( habla con migo) 13:39, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Torsten, good to hear from you again! Hominid will need some more work before it becomes a GA. Here are a few suggestions:
Hope these suggestions help. If you need another look, just let me know. María ( habla con migo) 13:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Klaus Ebner for a good article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets good article criteria. Thank you:)-- Ice Sea ( talk) 15:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello Torsten. Yes I am willing to help. Buy I will have to do it slowly as I don't have much time lately. Meursault2004 ( talk) 23:57, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Fences& Windows 21:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Hominid (novel) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Hominid (novel) for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells ( talk) 21:08, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ingrid Reichel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingrid Reichel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk ( talk) 20:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)