|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Boris Pasternak has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Boris Pasternak was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest). However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
22:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist ( talk) 00:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Toreeva! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:19, 25 October 2014 (UTC) |
This section is moved to a Sandbox: User:Toreeva/sandbox. Toreeva ( talk) 14:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
This article is not about myself, but to show that the info in the Unofficial art in Russia article and in another articles, is contributed by the real person who was part of that movement. The article needs just to be improved and submitted in the format that appropriate to pass the requirements. But if you or someone will not have time, or for any other reason, to work on it, that's OK, even though it is the lost for the history of the Russian art, if look at the bigger picture. Toreeva ( talk) 16:57, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello Lacypaperclip ( talk), would you correct in the Article Natalia Toreeva the year in the references #6. It said 8 November 1920. Thanks for your input. Toreeva 04:39, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
If you look into the article, it is July 1971, so this date should be. Or you can leave the path as it was before the changes: http://smena-online.ru/stories/leto-71 Thanks a lot for help with your editing! Toreeva 05:37, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
It looks OK now. I don't have any request for this article. Thanks! But I have a question: In the Soviet Unof. Art article, I found the way to connect en.wikipedia and ru.wikipedia if the artists have both, it is valuable information. For example, one artist just had exhibition in museum in St. Petersburg, and I'm going to write her to include this info to the ru wikipedia which she has, so we can read it outside of the Russia. But I don't like [ ] in [ ](ru). Do you know the way how to avoid [ ] and to have only (ru) in this connection of both wikipedia's? If you don't know, or don't have time, it is OK, at least it works. I just wanted to improve it. Thanks!Toreeva 22:04, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello Lacypaperclip ( talk), I found the way to avoid extra [] for the ru wikipedia link, so I have only (ru) for it. You can see it as an example for E. Rukhin artist in the Soviet Nonc. Art article. Thanks.Toreeva 02:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
As per the talk page of Natalia Toreeva you are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections on or suggest contenton the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. Theroadislong ( talk) 21:56, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aleksei Yuryevich German, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong ( talk) 20:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Toreeva. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Soviet Nonconformist Art, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It is extremely bad form to continue to promote yourself across Wikipedia with poor sources. Theroadislong ( talk) 21:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Twenty Days Without War. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong ( talk) 15:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Toreeva! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 04:10, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. Theroadislong ( talk) 16:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your career, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{
unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See
Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our
username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Toreeva ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
I am not going to convince you why you block my input, it is waste time, if you did not see it before. But main problem is that you have editor(s) who don't know Russian lang. to read the citations and Soviet Culture to estimate the value of my contributions. Small example of it: if you see the article and "Publications and late Exhibition" section the citation (65) shows "failed verification", but if you read citation there 2 names correctly mentioned (ru:Анатолия Басина и Наталии Тореевой..) meaning that the editor can't read Russian text, so how editing can be done w/o knowledge the lang.? That's why easier to tell that the article is self promotion which is not true. But suggestion to use another user name is correct, bec. it puts off the editor(s) to hunting my real name.
Toreeva ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
It was not necessary to be blocked.
Decline reason:
Criticizing other users, then claiming you did nothing wrong is not going to get you unblocked. You still have not addressed the reason for the block, the spam/advertising edits you made. You need to address these, NOT the conduct of other editors. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 19:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I forgot to add the reason why I should be unblocked. I did not do any damage or disruption to the article. I did not do anything wrong, but because my criticism of the editor(s) who used their editors power to put me out of my contributions due to their personal or political interests w/o knowledge of Russian language and culture, they tried to block me. It was not for the incorrect content of the articles in my contributions or promotional reason, but for my criticism of editor(s) actions. That's why I ask to be unblocked. Toreeva ( talk) 18:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Guy Macon ( talk), Do you think to talk like "the spam/advertising edits you made" is the right way you talk with the contributor? What a shame Wikipedia should have and those who involved in it. Toreeva ( talk) 22:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Boris Pasternak has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Boris Pasternak was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest). However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
22:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist ( talk) 00:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Toreeva! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:19, 25 October 2014 (UTC) |
This section is moved to a Sandbox: User:Toreeva/sandbox. Toreeva ( talk) 14:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
This article is not about myself, but to show that the info in the Unofficial art in Russia article and in another articles, is contributed by the real person who was part of that movement. The article needs just to be improved and submitted in the format that appropriate to pass the requirements. But if you or someone will not have time, or for any other reason, to work on it, that's OK, even though it is the lost for the history of the Russian art, if look at the bigger picture. Toreeva ( talk) 16:57, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello Lacypaperclip ( talk), would you correct in the Article Natalia Toreeva the year in the references #6. It said 8 November 1920. Thanks for your input. Toreeva 04:39, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
If you look into the article, it is July 1971, so this date should be. Or you can leave the path as it was before the changes: http://smena-online.ru/stories/leto-71 Thanks a lot for help with your editing! Toreeva 05:37, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
It looks OK now. I don't have any request for this article. Thanks! But I have a question: In the Soviet Unof. Art article, I found the way to connect en.wikipedia and ru.wikipedia if the artists have both, it is valuable information. For example, one artist just had exhibition in museum in St. Petersburg, and I'm going to write her to include this info to the ru wikipedia which she has, so we can read it outside of the Russia. But I don't like [ ] in [ ](ru). Do you know the way how to avoid [ ] and to have only (ru) in this connection of both wikipedia's? If you don't know, or don't have time, it is OK, at least it works. I just wanted to improve it. Thanks!Toreeva 22:04, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello Lacypaperclip ( talk), I found the way to avoid extra [] for the ru wikipedia link, so I have only (ru) for it. You can see it as an example for E. Rukhin artist in the Soviet Nonc. Art article. Thanks.Toreeva 02:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
As per the talk page of Natalia Toreeva you are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections on or suggest contenton the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. Theroadislong ( talk) 21:56, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aleksei Yuryevich German, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong ( talk) 20:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Toreeva. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Soviet Nonconformist Art, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It is extremely bad form to continue to promote yourself across Wikipedia with poor sources. Theroadislong ( talk) 21:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Twenty Days Without War. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong ( talk) 15:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Toreeva! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 04:10, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. Theroadislong ( talk) 16:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your career, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{
unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See
Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our
username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Toreeva ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
I am not going to convince you why you block my input, it is waste time, if you did not see it before. But main problem is that you have editor(s) who don't know Russian lang. to read the citations and Soviet Culture to estimate the value of my contributions. Small example of it: if you see the article and "Publications and late Exhibition" section the citation (65) shows "failed verification", but if you read citation there 2 names correctly mentioned (ru:Анатолия Басина и Наталии Тореевой..) meaning that the editor can't read Russian text, so how editing can be done w/o knowledge the lang.? That's why easier to tell that the article is self promotion which is not true. But suggestion to use another user name is correct, bec. it puts off the editor(s) to hunting my real name.
Toreeva ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
It was not necessary to be blocked.
Decline reason:
Criticizing other users, then claiming you did nothing wrong is not going to get you unblocked. You still have not addressed the reason for the block, the spam/advertising edits you made. You need to address these, NOT the conduct of other editors. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 19:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I forgot to add the reason why I should be unblocked. I did not do any damage or disruption to the article. I did not do anything wrong, but because my criticism of the editor(s) who used their editors power to put me out of my contributions due to their personal or political interests w/o knowledge of Russian language and culture, they tried to block me. It was not for the incorrect content of the articles in my contributions or promotional reason, but for my criticism of editor(s) actions. That's why I ask to be unblocked. Toreeva ( talk) 18:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Guy Macon ( talk), Do you think to talk like "the spam/advertising edits you made" is the right way you talk with the contributor? What a shame Wikipedia should have and those who involved in it. Toreeva ( talk) 22:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)